Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

White House considers payroll tax holiday
washingtonpost ^ | September 3, 2010 | Ezra Klein

Posted on 09/04/2010 6:43:00 AM PDT by Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid!

The White House is considering a push for hundreds of billions of dollars in new stimulative spending, focusing on business tax cuts including a temporary cut in payroll taxes. In part, this is good policy. In part, it's necessary policy. Anne Kornblut and Lori Montgomery quote an unnamed Democratic strategist complaining that the White House has let the issues get away from them in advance of November's election. "'We did the mosque, Katrina, Iraq, and now Middle East peace?' said a Democratic strategist who works closely with multiple candidates and spoke on the condition of anonymity. 'And in between you redo the Oval Office? It has become a joke.'"

(Excerpt) Read more at voices.washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: business; desperatedems; holiday; obama; payroll; stealideas; tax; toolate; wh
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-52 next last
As the wise Charles Krauthhammer said last night about this. This is an Obama desperate political ploy that is using Republican ideas for votes in the Nov. election. He said it won't work to save Obama and the democrats.

Too much, too little, too late.

Even if it were to happen it would be like taking money from Sam to pay Paul to give to Peter to pay Sam back.

1 posted on 09/04/2010 6:43:02 AM PDT by Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: All
""'We did the mosque, Katrina, Iraq, and now Middle East peace?' said a Democratic strategist who works closely with multiple candidates and spoke on the condition of anonymity. 'And in between you redo the Oval Office? It has become a joke."

Quote of the day!

2 posted on 09/04/2010 6:46:12 AM PDT by Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid!

Not to mention vacations in Spain and Martha’s Vinyard, the sixth this year. Maybe this ‘strategist’ didn’t want to rub it in too much...


3 posted on 09/04/2010 6:54:49 AM PDT by bcsco (From Recovery Summer to The Winter of our Discontent...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid!

I’m thinking this is a trap - typical divide and conquer libtardism. They make payroll tax exempt for the first $xx. They make it infinite on every dollar earned up to $5 billion. The exemption becomes permanent and the number exempt creeps higher. In the end you end up with 100 million Americans more with zero skin in the game. The class warfare grows. Those that don’t pay get to vote against and extract more and more form those that do pay. In this way the overwhelming majority becomes dependent on the lefty’s. And the American experiment becomes irretrievable.


4 posted on 09/04/2010 6:57:58 AM PDT by major-pelham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid!
There will be NO holiday from US Taxpayers building mosques
in foreign lands.

Caliph Hussein Obama says it is our ONLY purpose.

THE REAL DEAL


BLS Data Series
U-6 unemployment
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2000 7.1 7.2 7.1 6.9 7.1 7.0 7.0 7.1 7.0 6.8 7.1 6.9
2001 7.3 7.4 7.3 7.4 7.5 7.9 7.8 8.1 8.7 9.3 9.4 9.6
2002 9.5 9.5 9.4 9.7 9.5 9.5 9.6 9.6 9.6 9.6 9.7 9.8
2003 10.0 10.2 10.0 10.2 10.1 10.3 10.3 10.1 10.4 10.2 10.0 9.8
2004 9.9 9.7 10.0 9.6 9.6 9.5 9.5 9.4 9.4 9.7 9.4 9.2
2005 9.3 9.3 9.1 8.9 8.9 9.0 8.8 8.9 9.0 8.7 8.7 8.6
2006 8.4 8.4 8.2 8.1 8.2 8.4 8.5 8.4 8.0 8.2 8.1 8.0
2007 8.3 8.1 8.0 8.2 8.2 8.2 8.3 8.5 8.4 8.4 8.5 8.8
2008 9.1 8.9 9.0 9.2 9.7 10.0 10.5 10.9 11.2 11.9 12.8 13.7
2009 14.0 15.0 15.6 15.8 16.4 16.5 16.4 16.8 17.0 17.4 17.2 17.3
2010 16.5 16.8 16.9 17.1 16.6 16.5 16.5 16.7

5 posted on 09/04/2010 6:59:20 AM PDT by Diogenesis (Si vis pacem, para bellum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid!
Cut payroll taxes? Last I checked, Social Security was in the red.

So of course this would be used as justification for not extended the Bush tax cuts to make up the difference.

6 posted on 09/04/2010 7:02:05 AM PDT by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid!
Even if it were to happen it would be like taking money from Sam to pay Paul to give to Peter to pay Sam back.

It would be an exact repeat of Cash for Clunkers and the Homebuyers Credit: produce a short-lived bump followed by a big crash that produces results in the near-term but lots more pain in the mid-long term. Analysis (more accurately: stating the obvious): this is an attempt to use Federal tax policy to buy the Nov elections.

The only things that'll really work are structural, and permanent, tax and spending cuts.

The problem isn't that companies and people aren't spending. That's just the symptom. The problem is that, with the Bush tax cuts set to expire and the overall statist behavior of this Administration, companies and people have NO CONFIDENCE in long-term economic prospects.
7 posted on 09/04/2010 7:04:53 AM PDT by tanknetter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid!
Just so that everyone is clear:

The only "payroll tax" in effect (at the federal level) is Social Security and Medicare. You currently pay 1.45% of all income, and 6.2% of the first $106,800 (per year).

Social Security is already paying more benefits than it is receiving in taxes. It's projected to be that way this year and next, then return to a positive cash flow until 2017, when it goes permanently negative.

When the cash flow goes negative, then Social Security must draw on it's 'trust fund'. Since that's just an accounting fiction, the money has to come from the federal income taxes, or increase the budget deficit further.

I think that reducing the payroll tax is a good idea, but I'm curious how it will be implemented: i.e. will it only be reduced on the first $50,000 of income, or something like that.

And I'll point out the obvious: it will put Social Security even more out-of-balance.

8 posted on 09/04/2010 7:07:18 AM PDT by justlurking (The only remedy for a bad guy with a gun is a good WOMAN (Sgt. Kimberly Munley) with a gun)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid!

They couldn’t possibly have figured out that lowering taxes on the productive class will stimulate growth. This is an obvious desperation ploy for the elections.


9 posted on 09/04/2010 7:09:30 AM PDT by UK_Jeffersonian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid!
This is just more obama bull$hi+; typical liberal election time, bait-and-switch, trickery to peel off a few votes of the chia pets out there.

Economically, it's a stupid move too...with all the jobs that have been lost, revenues are obviously already in the toilet, and he wants to "holiday" payroll taxes? Don't be fooled, he will use that loss of funds as an excuse for another "stimulus" just after the elections.

Payroll tax holidays will not fix what is wrong with America. Obama and the progressives are what is wrong with America. We're not sticking out our necks and investing in employees, materials, or goods until we have someone in charge who will get government out of the way. Obama is NOT that person.

Did he say anything about extending the Bush tax cuts? If he didn't, then it's proof that this payroll tax thing is a ploy.

obama's biggest problem is, he done way too much damage, stolen way too much of our money, ruined the economy, lied time and time again, and no one believes him anymore.

Everyone should send him a printout of "The Boy Who Cried Wolf", because that is EXACTLY where he stands now. I don't even know anyone who will leave the TV or Radio playing when he is on.

He's sickening and disgusting and low class, blowing $50 grand a week on parties and vacations while we wonder where the next meal is coming from...he can kiss where the sun don't shine for all I care.

BHOJuice


10 posted on 09/04/2010 7:10:26 AM PDT by FrankR (It doesn't matter what they call us, only what we answer to....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; Arthur Wildfire! March; Berosus; bigheadfred; blueyon; Convert from ECUSA; dervish; ...

Speaking of shoring up the base, thanks bereanway.

Thanks Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid!


11 posted on 09/04/2010 7:13:44 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (Democratic Underground... matters are worse, as their latest fund drive has come up short...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid!

Oooooooooooh! I’m gonna get me some of 0bama’s stash!


12 posted on 09/04/2010 7:16:32 AM PDT by matt1234 (The only crisis 0bama can manage is one he intentionally created.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: matt1234

ROTFL!


13 posted on 09/04/2010 7:18:17 AM PDT by shiva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid!
Another trillion dollars in deficits. What's not to like about this plan?
14 posted on 09/04/2010 7:23:43 AM PDT by Gritty (There's no other way to say it... (Obama is) an enemy within - Matt Barber)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: UK_Jeffersonian
You'll remember that during the presidential debates when it was pointed out to O’Slacker that lowering tax rates actually resulted in an increase in revenue to the treasury, he replied that that wasn't the issue. No, it was all about “being fair”. Typical Marxist brain at work.
15 posted on 09/04/2010 7:27:12 AM PDT by JPG (How much taxpayer $ did Mookie blow today?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

The White House is considering a push for hundreds of billions of dollars in new stimulative spending, focusing on business tax cuts including a temporary cut in payroll taxes.

Yet another example of the political and media "Dumb-Masses" (thanks Neal) not understanding, or possibly even obfuscating the fact that cutting taxes is NOT spending!

There are far too many in government, media, and unfortunately, the public that don't understand that finances consist of TWO modes: Income and Expense. Changes in taxes will effect income. Changes in spending effect expense.

Mark

16 posted on 09/04/2010 7:36:10 AM PDT by MarkL (Do I really look like a guy with a plan?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid!

Had this been done before, and in lieu of, any of this “stimulus” or bailout crap, it would have probably worked, and I’d have supported it. Also would have had less effect on the deficit...

However, it’s simply just more crap now.


17 posted on 09/04/2010 7:46:28 AM PDT by RockinRight (Was it over when the Germans bombed Pearl Harbor?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid!

Between the husband and I, we’d ‘save’ about $900/month by not paying into SS and Medicre. Sounds nice, doesn’t it? I’m against it 100%. Like we need to make those programs more insolvent than they already are! What I’d rather see is for those clowns in Washington to QUIT WASTING MONEY! CUT SPENDING!


18 posted on 09/04/2010 7:48:45 AM PDT by Trust but Verify
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: justlurking

They only take money for SS up to 106K? Why not have every thing earned then SS is saved? I know everyone here is against SS but if we can save it then it is a non issue for the Democrats!! HINT HINT. Sometimes you have to be smarter than the Democrats.


19 posted on 09/04/2010 8:05:28 AM PDT by napscoordinator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: bcsco

The Obama family are vacationing at Camp David.

It must have tough on Barry Hussein to make the decision to spend spend spend pass more stimulus crap and blame Bush and the republicans.

He blamed the republicans for NOT passing some jobs bill.
SOMEONE CORRECT ME IF I AM CONFUSED but aren’t the democrats the majority they have the votes to pass anything they want at 3AM and not read it. So HOW COULD Obama blame the republicans? Am I missing something seriously?


20 posted on 09/04/2010 8:13:20 AM PDT by Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid!

Cutting the payroll taxes could be revenue neutral. The company quits paying; just make the employee pay the full amount. Government gets what it was always getting, companies pay less. Most of the democrat voters won’t be smart enough to realize that they’ve just lost spendable income.


21 posted on 09/04/2010 8:21:27 AM PDT by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: matt1234

LOL no you won’t really it will be Uncle Sammy stash that he borrowed from Wong Lee Chow to pay back Mahommed to pay Peter to pay Paul to pay you with a bankrupt fund.

It will be like the housing credit. You will pay it back and then some.

They need to ALL take pay cuts and give the check book to one adult that is not Obama.


22 posted on 09/04/2010 8:23:22 AM PDT by Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: PAR35

Yes and the unions that are all tied to Obama need dismantled and called to the carpet.


23 posted on 09/04/2010 8:25:02 AM PDT by Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Nachum; 444Flyer; hoosiermama

ping


24 posted on 09/04/2010 8:27:18 AM PDT by Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

Obama is an idiot.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/09/04/white-house-link-tax-plan-hiring/


25 posted on 09/04/2010 8:29:34 AM PDT by Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid!
He said it won't work to save Obama and the democrats.

I predict it will work at least as well as the GOP pandering to minority voters.

26 posted on 09/04/2010 8:29:46 AM PDT by Vigilanteman (Obama: Fake black man. Fake Messiah. Fake American. How many fakes can you fit in one Zer0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid!
hundreds of billions of dollars in new stimulative spending, focusing on business tax cuts including a temporary cut in payroll taxes

Let me translate:
We are going to "temporarily" cut payroll taxes until the midterms to try and save our asses, but when you do your 2010 taxes there will be no payroll tax cut rate. You will still owe the same.

The tax cut was temporary until you do your taxes at years end and then you pay it back.

27 posted on 09/04/2010 8:39:33 AM PDT by Popman (Obama. First Marxist to turn a five year Marxist plan into a 4 year administration.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid!; All

Judging by the comments Obama is fooling no one well except for a few people who is still blaming Bush....


28 posted on 09/04/2010 8:39:38 AM PDT by KevinDavis (President Obama: The Crybaby in Chief...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid!
We did the mosque, Katrina, Iraq, and now Middle East peace

We DID them? No mention of serious policy or success...just "we did them." What a pathetic joke. A serial string of massive failures in a volatile and dangerous world and the incumbents describe it as "we did them" just like playing a round of golf.

29 posted on 09/04/2010 8:41:39 AM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid!
Here, see what scummy Ezra Klein and WaPo and their pals are like:

Ezra Klein, founder of Journolist:

A columnist for Newsweek !

A blogger for the Washington Post !!!

Good ol' Ezra Klein wrote on Twitter the following about much beloved Tim Russert:

"f*** tim russert. f*** him with a spiky acid-tipped d*ck."

What a great guy, Journolist Founder Ezra !!!

----------------------

----------------------------------- JournoList Members:

(Wiki) Members of JournoList included, among others: Ezra Klein, Jeffrey Toobin, Eric Alterman, Paul Krugman, Joe Klein (no relation to Ezra Klein), Matthew Yglesias, and Jonathan Chait.

--------------

Main article: JournoList

In February 2007 Klein created a Google Groups forum called "JournoList" for discussing politics and the news media. The forum's membership was controlled by Klein and limited to "several hundred left-leaning bloggers, political reporters, magazine writers, policy wonks and academics."[16]

Posts within JournoList were intended only be made and read by its members.[17] Klein defended the forum saying that it "[ensures] that folks feel safe giving off-the-cuff analysis and instant reactions". JournoList member, and

Time magazine columnist, Joe Klein added that the off-the-record nature of the forum was necessary because “candor is essential and can only be guaranteed by keeping these conversations private”.[16]

Ezra Klein (born May 9, 1984) is an American blogger for the Washington Post and a columnist for Newsweek. He was formerly an associate editor for The American Prospect political magazine and an American liberal[1] political blogger at the same publication.[2]

30 posted on 09/04/2010 8:44:35 AM PDT by DontTreadOnMe2009 (So stop treading on me already!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid!

I hope you’re not expecting an argument on that one. ;’D


31 posted on 09/04/2010 9:01:28 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (Democratic Underground... matters are worse, as their latest fund drive has come up short...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid!
Tax holiday? Good, I can buy more emergency stores and ammo. Can't have enough to be ready for what's comin' down the pike!

Somehow I don't think that's the "stimulus" that Obama would have in mind.

32 posted on 09/04/2010 9:02:30 AM PDT by The Duke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid!

$35 billion of tax cuts — which is just over 2 percent of the Obama deficit.


33 posted on 09/04/2010 9:02:40 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (Democratic Underground... matters are worse, as their latest fund drive has come up short...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid!
So HOW COULD Obama blame the republicans? Am I missing something seriously?

Yes, you are. He can do it simply because he can. And a percentage of Americans (small though it is) will still believe it simply because they can. It has nothing to do with the truth, all to do with the ability to deceive.

34 posted on 09/04/2010 9:12:04 AM PDT by bcsco (From Recovery Summer to The Winter of our Discontent...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: bcsco

Things have been screwed up ever since the dems took control.

I was just wondering if I missed in the news the republicans stopping some jobs bill for whatever reason....pork filled or what not.

It probably gave SEIU and the unions slush money but Obama does not care.

I saw Wanda Sykes last night an LKLIVE and I listened as she truly believed that people were nuts for doubting Obama’s intentions.


35 posted on 09/04/2010 9:35:46 AM PDT by Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom

36 posted on 09/04/2010 9:49:13 AM PDT by Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: DontTreadOnMe2009

Thanks for that informative post. A member of Obama’s private press I see. So we know the intent is twisted and meaningless.


37 posted on 09/04/2010 9:51:04 AM PDT by Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: tanknetter

“The problem is ... the overall statist behavior of this Administration, companies and people have NO CONFIDENCE in long-term economic prospects.”

Ya think? Ya think maybe everyone has lost confidence because Trojan Marxists are in charge of the economy? Ya think maybe the natural reaction to redistributionists trying to claw wealth away from earners to “redistribute” it to non-earners would be for the earners to hunker down and try to prevent their wealth from being “redistributed”? You know, hunker down, as in not loaning money, not borrowing money, not spending money, not taking risks, not hiring, and withdrawing and hiding money from the financial system. You know, like simply performing no financial transactions at all, since not transacting is the simplest way to keep your wealth from being subject to taxation and redistribution.

It’s simple, actually. Wealth is extracted by the wealth-takers from the wealth-creators when money flows from one place to another, that is, when a financial transaction occurs. The takers have inserted various money-snatching filters in those flows, but when the money-snatching begins to siphon so much of the money that the flows result in a net loss of wealth instead of a net gain in wealth, then those who initiate the flows simply shut them down.

You can visualize a financial transaction as water flowing in a pipe and taxation as a tap the government installs to steal some of the water. The wealth creators open the spigot and some of their wealth flows down the pipe, say to sprinkle on a field in order to grow some new factories that employ people and produce goods they can buy with their wages. Now, say, a 1000 gallons goes in one end, the government steals 100 gallons from its tap and gives away gallon jugs to buy votes with or whatever, and 900 gallons end up helping the new factories grow. Things still keep on working. The factories grow, people are employed, goods are manufactured, and wealth increases for everyone involved.

Now, suppose the government steals, say 400 gallons to “redistribute”, and only 600 gallons get through to grow the new factories. Well, the factories fail to grow, and the wealth creators say, “This isn’t working, the heck with this”, and they close the spigot. Now there’s no new factories and the government gets nothing either. You know, pretty much like the economy we see today under the helm of the Obammunist redistributionists.

Basically, this is simply a modern version of Aesop’s fable, “The Goose That Laid the Golden Eggs”, and the Trojan Marxists in charge of the economy right now are busily eviscerating the goose to reach those last hard to reach golden eggs in order to slice them up and “redistribute” them. It’s no wonder the golden egg supply has dried up, now is it?


38 posted on 09/04/2010 9:52:52 AM PDT by catnipman (Cat Nipman: Made from the Right Stuff!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid!

A holiday is a temporary halt in collection. What happens when the bill comes due and people have to come up with the taxes in a lump sum?


39 posted on 09/04/2010 10:33:22 AM PDT by wildbill (You're just jealous because the Voices talk only to me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator
Why not have every thing earned then SS is saved?

Social Security benefits are calculated according to the amount that you contribute. Removing the payroll tax cap would just boost the benefit for higher wage earners.

Unless, of course, you were to put a lower cap on benefits. But, that would make it an even worse deal for high wage earners.

If you calculated the effective rate on return of Social Security benefits (when accounting for contributions), the people at the low end of the income scale get a good deal. As you get up to the middle and upper middle income scale, the effective rate of return gets smaller and smaller, until it is about 1%.

Collecting more taxes from "the rich" without increasing benefits would make their effective rate of return negative. That's a classic Democrat scheme: soak the rich.

There's nothing "smart" about that.

And, the truth is: it wouldn't work. Most people with high salaries (six figures and up) have the ability to negotiate "flexible" compensation schemes. All they would have to do is shift "salary" into other income categories, like stock options. The income would still be taxable, but it wouldn't be subject to the payroll tax.

40 posted on 09/04/2010 10:51:28 AM PDT by justlurking (The only remedy for a bad guy with a gun is a good WOMAN (Sgt. Kimberly Munley) with a gun)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator

Because it is 15% friggin’ percent of income! I can think of a hell of a lot better ways to spend 15% of my gross income than to supplement a dying system that should have been means tested out of existence a long time ago.


41 posted on 09/04/2010 11:56:11 AM PDT by Sequoyah101 (Half of the population is below average)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid!

He will give a tax break and still expect you to pay it in April.


42 posted on 09/04/2010 11:58:50 AM PDT by bmwcyle (It is Satan's fault)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid!

Like any tax cut when sitting to the right of the Laffer curve peak, it will be a true stimulus and will result in paradoxically higher revenues.

If the Rats go through with this, the GOP will be smart to praise Obama for “the only good idea he ever had, and that was borrowed from us.”


43 posted on 09/04/2010 12:01:45 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (I am in America but not of America (per bible: am in the world but not of it))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid!

Katrina????


44 posted on 09/04/2010 12:01:48 PM PDT by Osage Orange (MOLON LABE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid!

The votes of the past will decide the votes of the future. The critters are doomed if their name is on tarp,stimulus or deathcare. None of it worked because the leadership has not been honest about any of it. Vote em’ out!


45 posted on 09/04/2010 12:02:58 PM PDT by eyedigress ((Old storm chaser from the west)?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Popman

That one tenth of one percent savings doesn’t have much muscle does it? Obama is an OJT nightmare.


46 posted on 09/04/2010 12:06:10 PM PDT by eyedigress ((Old storm chaser from the west)?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: tanknetter

“The problem isn’t that companies and people aren’t spending. That’s just the symptom. “

Anyone that spends for the purpose of spending needs to be locked up for life!


47 posted on 09/04/2010 12:11:43 PM PDT by dalereed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: bmwcyle

exactamundo. It is all a big game to make fun of/blame the rich play peter pan and watch Soros and Obama and chicago gang get rich all awhile they call Bush and the republicans to be for the rich.


48 posted on 09/04/2010 12:13:47 PM PDT by Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid!

I got that extra with my VA last year. It was not tax free like all my other VA.


49 posted on 09/04/2010 12:24:30 PM PDT by bmwcyle (It is Satan's fault)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid!

The so-called tax cut won’t be for everyone...Obama, et al will pick and choose winners and losers as usual...

Sen. Russ Feingold (D., Wis.), who is in a tough re-election fight, is urging an extension and expansion of a payroll tax cut for small firms hiring new workers. The White House is examining that idea, as well as a proposal to extend the payroll tax cut to those who are hired. It also wants to extend the research-and-development tax credit.


50 posted on 09/04/2010 12:29:20 PM PDT by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-52 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson