What termination? The person in question resigned on her own will. As a result, there is no legal quibble with her former employer.
I certainly have nothing against a religious organization enforcing its rules of conduct on its employees. I am just simply pointing out that as a result of this person willingly resigning, as opposed to being fired, she has 0 legal standing against her employer.
Please. This was a "diplomatic" termination. What else does, "resign or you're terminated" supposed to mean?
Regardless, the termination was warranted.
So what if there were "legal quibble"? As shown in my post, Mark Dupont stated that all employees were familiar with the rules and regulations of the school, and it was grounds for termination if they violated them (like most if not all businesses do).
I certainly have nothing against a religious organization enforcing its rules of conduct on its employees.
What about non-religious organizations? (Forget current legislation). As a private businessman who pays the mortgage, taxes, etc. etc. etc. on MY OWN BUSINESS, do I not have the right to say who I want to hire? Or is "choice" only valid when it comes to murdering the unborn?