Skip to comments.Open letter to conservatives who back same-sex marriage
Posted on 09/06/2010 9:57:15 AM PDT by LonelyCon
click here to read article
At least he knew what the heck I was babbling about with that song.
Yes and you’re a brat for starting it. I HATE that song. And the ones you hate always stick and reverberate!
Pretty much, yep. ;-)
Could be worse, could have been “Come to my Window” instead.
Don't you, Don't you, Don't you, Don't you?
I always thought the song was skipping at that point.
I would be very interested to hear the basis of your judgment that your homosexual friends are doing a "spectacular job" raising their adopted children. By the way, are these actually your friends, or are they merely acquaintances in your neighborhood who "seem" to be nice people? Have you seen what goes on behind closed doors - or, heaven forbid, have you allowed yourself to be misled by the superficial outward appearances we are all so skilled at presenting?
More to the point, have you engaged in any objective evaluation of the children? Perhaps you have accepted prima facie some glowing news reports about homosexual parenting, and are assuming that your friends/acquaintences must be doing a "spectacular" job.
You may perhaps be unaware that such studies typically rely upon the self-reporting of the homosexual parents (in essence, asking those who very likely have an agenda of presenting homosexual parenting in the best positive light to rate their own parenting skills).
Have you asked the children how they feel about being intentionally deprived of either a mother or a father? As someone who has researched in and written on this subject, it is heartbreaking to read about comments made by these precious children indicating that they are longing for their missing opposite-sex parent.
And I am deeply offended by the callous response of their "daddies" or "mommies," who treat as a joke the child's heartfelt wondering about when they are getting their own mommy or daddy (curiously, there is no evidence that these children have been "indoctrinated" by "intolerant" pro-family activists...)
Sadly, it seems that in the rush to grant full societal affirmation to a lifestyle that almost all cultures have deemed to be inimical to the institution of marriage and the family, no one is listening to the children.
Sorry about getting songs stuck in your head.
The world that Paul was preaching to was filled with homosexuals, idol worshippers, murderers, alduterers, thieves, gossipers,slanderers, practitioners of witchcraft ect, all of whom already given over to “a reprobate state”. It was the world of the Roman empire, a darkened world given to the very darkened imagination as described in Romans 1. Paul was describing the world he was to preach to and he goes on in the rest of Romans to prescribe the cure, which was of course Jesus Christ. Christ came to save sinners including homosexuals, not leave them in their reprobate state. You have to read the whole of Romans in order to understand Chapter 1’s context!
Which parts are not in agreement?
The ones that are in bold print.
It looks like you spotted a troll.
The information in my bio and the post here are not mutually exclusive. The events described do not preclude me from having such knowledge. I beliebve your comment is based upon incorrect logic in which you relied upon a perceived connection that may not, nor need not, be true for my comments to be truithful and non-contradictory.
If you had been here “a few years ago”, you would not now be “learning the ropes”.
Really troll? When was it that Free Republic "debated" the validity of the far left agenda.
A few years ago, some posters took over the argument and ran everyone who disgreed with them off the threads and the site.
Hey troll, you joined FOUR MONTHS AGO. What are you previous names here?
Then the owner came out and agreed with them with his declaration against "homosexualism."
Are you trying to suggest that Jim once SUPPORTED the homosexual agenda?
Many good conservative people have been banned or left because if they disagreed with any one point, they were called pro-agenda, anti-FR, and worse.