[Huck]

Newt's out of his mind. He's arguing that 1958 was a turning point in judicial supremacy? Brutus' attacks on Article 3, here and elsewhere in his writings, clearly demonstrate that the problem is structural, and was present from the beginning. It didn't happen in 1958. It happened in 1787.

Once the system got up and running, how long did it take for the tenor of the "federal" court to be clear? Maybe up until the Adams administration? The problem is Article 3, as written and understood at the time.

[Bigun]

Did you even listen to Newt’s lectures? Are you even remotely familiar with the material he cited in those lectures?

If not, take the time to listen to what he says before going of the deep end.