Skip to comments.
A Sadly Wary Misunderstanding of Muslim-Americans." But Really Is It (No 1st Amendment for Muslims)
The New Republic ^
| September 4, 2010
| Martin Peretz
Posted on 09/08/2010 5:09:14 AM PDT by tlb
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-23 last
To: knarf
That is the correct pronunciation.
21
posted on
09/08/2010 1:27:46 PM PDT
by
wbarmy
(I chose to be a sheepdog once I saw what happens to the sheep.)
To: screaminsunshine
My question: Can you be a good person AND a good Muslim?
The two seem mutually exclusive.
Given the nature of Islam, I think Muslims are about as entitled to the “free practice” of Islam as the Aztecs and the Carthaginians would be practice their horrific religions.
22
posted on
09/08/2010 1:48:47 PM PDT
by
Little Ray
(The Gods of the Copybook Headings with terror and slaughter return!)
To: Little Ray
I think you are right. A religion with human sacrifice is not covered by the first amendment. Jihad is human sacrifice. Thus nit covered. Burn baby Burn.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-23 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson