Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Haley Barbour Tells Pro-Life Republicans to Ditch Social Issues in 2010 Elections
LifeNews.com ^ | September 8, 2010 | Steven Ertelt

Posted on 09/08/2010 11:03:34 AM PDT by julieee

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 161-179 next last
To: onyx

Yes mam


61 posted on 09/08/2010 11:47:42 AM PDT by WKB (Oil spill = illegal immigration -- One hole plugged one to go..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Opinionated Blowhard
Right!!!!

So called "conservatives" around here have become as emotional and reactive as any of the liberals we have been combatting over the past 4 decades.

They don't care what the facts are, they simply react to whatever headline they encounter without even bothering to investigate the facts.

As far as I can see, this nation is beyond saving. Nobody cares about the truth, they are too lazy to investigate what they are told, and everytime someone sends them a chain email, they rush out to yell about it at the top of their lungs . . . whether or not it contains any truth at all.

Just look at the uninformed angry responses in this thread. Barbour may be the best conservative running in the country. His credentials are sterling and his pro-life record is pretty much flawless, but some clown writes what amounts to a hit piece based on half truths and suddenly he's an evil RINO.

I tell you, it's pretty much hopeless. Darn shame, America was a terrific idea. Somewhere along the way, we lost it.

Here's what he actually said:
“Any issue that takes people’s eye off of unemployment, job creation, economic growth, taxes, spending, deficits, debts is taking your eye off the ball.

But if somebody goes to campaign for governor candidate x, I would hope that somebody would stay focused on the issues that matter to the campaign: jobs, the economy, taxes, spending, debt, deficits.

You run down rabbit trails, you're wasting— you're using up valuable resources that could be used to talk to people about what they care about.”
He's right. If this nation doesn't immediately do something about the economy, right to life concerns will be irrelevant as people struggle just to survive.
62 posted on 09/08/2010 11:49:57 AM PDT by Sudetenland (Slow to anger but terrible in vengence...such is the character of the American people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: julieee

Then Haley’s an ass . . . if we cannot protect the unborn and newly born from slaughter, then none of our rights mean a damn . . . and NOW is the time to put our eggs in the Tea Party basket to demand their voice be heard. How can he be so stupid as to get in league with the murderous dummycrats . . . if he really said this, then I’ve lost all respect for him.


63 posted on 09/08/2010 11:52:18 AM PDT by laweeks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Artemis Webb

I’m sorry, but the criticism is spot on. It’s not ‘either-or’. Fiscal issues are important, but so is getting rid of taxpayer funded abortion.


64 posted on 09/08/2010 11:54:42 AM PDT by BenKenobi (We cannot do everything at once, but we can do something at once. -Silent Cal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: 9YearLurker
That’s not what he’s saying—’get off the bus’ ... Jeesh!

Exactly. May sanity return to FR and this circular firing squad cease firing. From the article:

the Mississippi governor said those who focus on social issues like abortion are taking the GOP off message this election cycle.

“Any issue that takes people’s eye off of unemployment, job creation, economic growth, taxes, spending, deficits, debts is taking your eye off the ball,”

He said his advice is primarily for candidates seeking election in November,

Barbour said a candidate's stance on abortion “ain’t going to change anybody’s vote this year."

Haley is one of the good guys.

65 posted on 09/08/2010 11:56:22 AM PDT by Servant of the Cross (the Truth will set you free ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie
Will you people never learn

Seems we already have, we elected a (r) President, congress and senate, and they changed nothing, when they could have.

The Supreme Court is not supreme, but our closet progressive RINO's certainly hide behind the court decisions, in order to advance their true agenda.

Do you really believe no one in the FBI, or CIA, or in the Senate really knew nothing about Obama and his background? If you do then the Republic is truly lost, and this forum is a waste of time.

Do not go gently into that sweet goodnight my friends.

Barbour will take us directly, back into RINO Land. Go to daily caller and see all the positive feedback he gets for putting the loony Christians in their rightful place, at the back of the bus with Sarah Palin and Glen Beck.

Why do you think Goldwater really lost? Check Anne Coulter for her opinion, maybe you will understand why Megs McCain cried when her dad selected Palin as his running mate.

66 posted on 09/08/2010 12:00:19 PM PDT by itsahoot (We the people allowed Republican leadership to get us here, only God's Grace can get us out.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: onyx
Please read my link and watch the video. This headline is highly misleading. It’s all about context. As you know, Haley Barbour is 100% pro-life.

He is, and Mississippi has been on record as one of the most pro-life states in the union. If he comes out with a pro-choice agenda for the platform then he and we have a diff. problem.
67 posted on 09/08/2010 12:02:05 PM PDT by mstar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: WKB

I’d like your opinion after you watch the video and read the accompanying article. I think this headline/title is highly misleading.


68 posted on 09/08/2010 12:02:25 PM PDT by onyx (If you support Sarah and want on her Ping List, let me know!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: mstar

Haley Barbour would never go for a pro-choice agenda. The article with the video I linked puts his remarks all in their proper context. Governor Barbour is not my candidate regardless. I’m solidly for Sarah Palin.

:)


69 posted on 09/08/2010 12:06:44 PM PDT by onyx (If you support Sarah and want on her Ping List, let me know!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: 9YearLurker
I don’t agree at all with your assessment of the electorate. The idea that most economic conservatives vote for the Dems is just loopy.

Don't lie in desperation to make your point, I never said that at all.

True conservatives are conservative period, social, economic, and military, most people that are anti-social conservative like you, vote Democrat. "Social conservatism is conservatism, but of course there are many moderates and social liberals that cling to conservatives for economic reasons although the vast majority of them vote Democrat"

70 posted on 09/08/2010 12:06:59 PM PDT by ansel12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: onyx

This is from the article.
“Barbour was asked about the “truce” potential presidential candidate Mitch Daniels, the Indiana governor, called for on social issues that quickly got him in trouble with pro-life advocates.

Though Barbour is strongly pro-life and has signed pro-life legislation, he said he agreed with Daniels’ sentiment, which Daniels partly walked back in a subsequent interview.

Barbour said a candidate’s stance on abortion “ain’t going to change anybody’s vote this year.”


71 posted on 09/08/2010 12:09:12 PM PDT by ansel12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: julieee

The uniting issues are all about economic opportunity in the US of A. The divisive issues are social/moral issues. Appropriate to hashing things out in the primaries...will interfere with success in the general elections.


72 posted on 09/08/2010 12:09:22 PM PDT by mo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ejonesie22

Haley, Mississippi ping.


73 posted on 09/08/2010 12:09:58 PM PDT by Servant of the Cross (the Truth will set you free ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: engrpat
Amazing how so many on this board refuse to read and you are correct. So many get wrapped around one issue and press their position forgetting that elections must first be won. Push the winning hand you have, don't go off message and stay on track. After the election then push your agenda.

BTTT

74 posted on 09/08/2010 12:11:58 PM PDT by Constitution Day
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: julieee
Haley Barbour just lost my support. I am not surprised, he is an establishment GOP oldie. I respect his record as Governor, but if you are unwilling to defend the defenseless innocents, then why am I supposed to believe you are going to defend the Constitution?
75 posted on 09/08/2010 12:16:14 PM PDT by J Edgar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: onyx
Haley Barbour would never go for a pro-choice agenda

I don't believe he would, but it's been a rough ride with "sell outs". I love both Sarah and Haley, and will go for a strong pro-life, pro-family conservative ticket. Blessings :)
76 posted on 09/08/2010 12:19:44 PM PDT by mstar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Sudetenland; 9YearLurker; Ann Archy
He's right. If this nation doesn't immediately do something about the economy, right to life concerns will be irrelevant as people struggle just to survive.

Several things. How funny you mention "right to life" and "survive" in the same breath. (Right to live for me & thine is fine; but right to live for thou womb one, who cares?)

It used to me that you had to kiss babies to campaign. Now, the supposed "pro-life party" just throws 'em under the bus *re your quote of H.B. labeling all social issues as "a rabbit trail."

How many pro-lifers think actually having a generation to hand off this nation to as a "rabbit trail?"

What's also "funny" is that we never seem to see the "fiscal types" suggest the reverse "tactic."

The U.S. has been the wealthiest culture ever in the history of the world. And when this nation was at the height of its wealthiest production -- coupled at a time where voters were talking "values" and also where we were in the thick of a major, major moral freefall -- we didn't see the "fiscal conservatives" say, "Any issue that takes people’s eye off of values, social issues, abortion, protecting marriage, etc. is taking your eye off the ball...You run down rabbit trails, you're wasting— you're using up valuable resources that could be used to talk to people about what they care about.”

So guess what? It's NEVER the "right time" to discuss the mass dismemberment of the youngest members of our human family. It's seemingly always "wise" to postpone "polite discussion" about this.

So, don't be deceived by the people who can't multi-task. Believe me, if we ever get in another WW with multiple fronts -- like WWII -- you won't want them in a leadership position, anyway...they'll not be able to juggle it all.

And one more thing, Sudetenland, mYou have the whole thing reversed. It's the nations that kill off the vulnerable en masse that don't survive, anyway. 'Tis a little thing known as God's judgment -- or just plain consequences from immoral lifestyles of "me first"...like where we see in European and even some Asian countries where they're not even replacing themselves population-wise...These immoral realities become so multiplied within the culture that it becomes too far gone to salvage.

77 posted on 09/08/2010 12:21:32 PM PDT by Colofornian ( If we could CTR, we wouldn't need Jesus to be OUR righteousness (1 Cor. 1:30))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: onyx; ansel12
As you know, Haley Barbour is 100% pro-life.

Surely, you've heard the term, "paper tiger?"

78 posted on 09/08/2010 12:23:16 PM PDT by Colofornian ( If we could CTR, we wouldn't need Jesus to be OUR righteousness (1 Cor. 1:30))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: ansel12
When asked about comments by Indiana Gov. Mitch Daniels, a Republican, that said the GOP should call a “truce on the so-called social issues” to focus on fiscal matters, Barbour said he supported the sentiment. A candidate’s stance on abortion “ain’t going to change anybody’s vote this year,” he said.
79 posted on 09/08/2010 12:27:51 PM PDT by onyx (If you support Sarah and want on her Ping List, let me know!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: mstar
I don't believe he would, but it's been a rough ride with "sell outs". I love both Sarah and Haley, and will go for a strong pro-life, pro-family conservative ticket. Blessings :)

Absolutely. 100% pro-life. Men can say they're pro-life and I accept they're sincere, but Sarah Palin lives it.

I'm afraid that Haley Barbour is not very fond of Sarah, but that's okay. He's McCain's friend after all.

God speed, dear friend!

80 posted on 09/08/2010 12:32:47 PM PDT by onyx (If you support Sarah and want on her Ping List, let me know!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 161-179 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson