Posted on 09/08/2010 6:33:58 PM PDT by iowamark
This and amnesty.
Whew... Every time I see this stemaing pantload’s name I remember why I am so delighted she stepped away. Ping me if she ever defends or speaks up for judges who rule in favor of traditional American values.
Meanwhile, these three judges need to be flushed down the toilet, pronto.
... and in some cases... downright un-American.
LLS
... and obama.
LLS
I know she has no idea how ironic this statement is. Homo-activism is purely and singularly political.
If judges are going to act like legislators, they should be subject to being losing office like legislators.>>>>>>>>>
PRECISELY!!
Yes. and solely because she was the first woman. This racial/sexual PC garbage is getting so irritating.
Even if the judges are retain, the campaign may send a message that the judges’ decisions are not beyond criticism and accountability, especially if the vote is close.
Only in that progressivism was a turn from the American past toward statism. Our revered “Greatest Generation” had great faith in government.
I think it was Lincoln who drolly asked the question: How many legs does a dog have. Answer” Four. Calling a tail a leg doesn’t make it so. Calling a sexual liason between two men a “marriage” is like saying that a dog has five legs.
I agree... but... the government that the WWII generation respected and had faith in no longer exists in any way whatsoever.
LLS
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.