Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SaraJohnson

“Is that because the atheists say so? The arguments you gave are designed by atheist scientists to protect their little belief structure and kingdom. That is fine; they are allowed to have their own religion. But they may not impose their belief structure on everyone else from a delusion of superiority. In a world of many beliefs, it would serve science well if it removed itself from the atheists’ politics of religious dominance.”

Science is not a religion. Accepted scientific theories are based on evidence. Science also accepts that any particular theory could be proven wrong by counter evidence. If there was prevailing scientific evidence of the existence of God, then the existence of God would be accepted by science.


39 posted on 09/09/2010 12:30:00 PM PDT by Moral Hazard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]


To: Moral Hazard

Is that like the science temple’s doctrine of man made Global Warming and all it’s degreed gods who found evidence of it? Heck the smart people even had a solution of giving alms to the global warming god in order to cool the earth down.

Science is anything but pure truth and scientists are anything but honorable priests in that atheist temple. As we learned with global warming, the high priests of science who review the lower priests proclaimations of scientific truth are self serving asses, too. They are no different than the fallen idiots who run the real churches and temples. Atheism and their science doctrines do not cure this disease of mankind, even in their own congregation.


42 posted on 09/09/2010 12:38:00 PM PDT by SaraJohnson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson