I did not read the D’Sousa article, but, I am going to take exception to it. I don’t think you can attribute a logical explanation to someone who is just incompetent, lazy, arrogant, narcissistic and evil. If any logical sense can be applied, it is no more than the evil Hitler brought to the Nazis or Stalin to the Soviets.
I just read the article. I like this guy D’Souza. I will have to familiarize myself with his body of work. He’s so logical and straightforward. Great analysis of the Kenyan Pretender and HOW HE THINKS.
Excerpt:
“Obama’s foreign policy is no less strange. He supports a $100 million mosque scheduled to be built near the site where terrorists in the name of Islam brought down the World Trade Center. Obama’s rationale, that “our commitment to religious freedom must be unshakable,” seems utterly irrelevant to the issue of why the proposed Cordoba House should be constructed at Ground Zero.”
Of course, the premise of the article is that Obama thinks at all...never mind HOW he thinks.
I think Obama thinks with a cigarette in one hand, a glass of Grey Goose in the other, and Reggie Love under the desk in the Oval Office.
Well, I read your comment - and I take exception to it.I don’t think you can attribute a logical explanation to someone who is just incompetent, lazy, arrogant, narcissistic and evil. If any logical sense can be applied, it is no more than the evil Hitler brought to the Nazis or Stalin to the Soviets.
There were probably people who said the same thing about comments by people who had actually read Mein KampfD'Souza reads Obama's book - and researches what that means in the context from which the attitudes Obama expresses in the book originate. In the context, that is, of Third-World reaction against European, especially British, colonialism. D'Souza himself is an immigrant from a country (India) which the British colonized, and that gives him some innate insight into that perspective.Why would you assume that there are no patterns to be discerned by such a study?