"'Tea party' is polarizing, but has many 'closet admirers,' poll finds"
Of course, it's polarizing; it wouldn't be much of a movement if it wasn't.
But then the left calls anything that stands in its way of total global domination, "polarizing".
The TPM doesn't really do anything that American patriots haven't done for the past 200 years; stand for freedom and the Constitution. But the new "progressives" see those two things alone as a total denial of their quest of running the world.
The MSM has worn the covers off its Thesaurus trying to find new words to use in villianizing the TPM; they've claimed racism where none exists; they've claimed violence when none has occurred, and they've even tried the long shot of "sedition".
But, like the signs in front of a lot of elementary schools in the nation, "Today's Word is: 'polarizing'." Can you say "polarizing"? "I knew you could.".
That's silly, but that is what the democrat party has left the far left bring them down to...trite silliness.
Every time we let the children use the car, we have to get it out of the ditch they run it into. Everytime the GOP has to come in an be the National clean-up crew like some dutiful father paying off their children's excesses.
But children recruit children and frat boys hire former frat boys, and so goes the democrat party...they will never achieve adulthood. The ones who fall by the wayside are those who sit and wait for entitlements.
This country wasn't founded by children, it was founded FOR our children to provide a place for them to grow up and enjoy freedom and prosperity, based on their will to work for their piece of the pie.
If "polarizing" is defined as demanding the rule of law, The Constitition, and freedom to pursue the American dream, then I'm all for it.
But if we need a good example of "polarizing", well, just look at our "post racial" president...the Liar-in-chief.
posted on 09/15/2010 1:36:04 PM PDT
(Standing up to TYRANTS is the only thing that will stop the onslaught of TYRANNY.)
is that like “optics” and “unexpected”?
posted on 09/15/2010 1:37:58 PM PDT
(The difference between a (de)humanist and a Satanist is that the latter knows who he's working for.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson