Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Montana GOP policy: Make homosexuality illegal
Associated Press ^ | 09/18/2010 | MATT VOLZ,

Posted on 09/18/2010 12:10:48 PM PDT by presidio9

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 401-406 next last
To: presidio9

so how ya going to feel about this subject when you come home to find some old queen trying to seduce your teen aged son?


81 posted on 09/18/2010 1:11:34 PM PDT by Joe Boucher ((FUBO) Less gubmint is best gubmint.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur

Yet it is the perverts of the left who demand the right to flaunt their sexuality in public and to push it in the face of our children.


82 posted on 09/18/2010 1:12:00 PM PDT by TheBigIf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: DJ MacWoW

LOL!


83 posted on 09/18/2010 1:12:00 PM PDT by rosettasister
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
I prefer to stay the hell out of other people’s bedrooms.

Agreed, so long as they keep it in the bedroom and out of my face. The problem is that they refuse to do so.

84 posted on 09/18/2010 1:13:08 PM PDT by JimRed (Excising a cancer before it kills us waters the Tree of Liberty too! TERM LIMITS, NOW AND FOREVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: BenKenobi

Yes, as I read it, the title of the article is wrong - ‘homosexuality’ wouldn’t be illegal at all. It’s homosexual acts that would be illegal.

So a homosexual wandering through the jurisdiction wouldn’t be criminally culpable for being homosexual, but he or she would be potentially crimiinally culpable for engaging in particular homosexual acts in the jurisdiction.

It’s a distinction that the AP couldn’t, or wouldn’t, make.


85 posted on 09/18/2010 1:13:16 PM PDT by Ted Grant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz
Yes, both homosexual and heterosexual in public should be prohibited by law.

Yet when homo parades are in town, police are told to overlook it......so much for your argument.

86 posted on 09/18/2010 1:13:56 PM PDT by Las Vegas Ron (Moderates manipulate, extremest use violence, but the goal is the same.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

“I prefer to stay the hell out of other people’s bedrooms.”

Ditto.


87 posted on 09/18/2010 1:14:29 PM PDT by RAR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: rosettasister

You think FR’s rules are funny?


88 posted on 09/18/2010 1:14:36 PM PDT by DJ MacWoW (If Bam is the answer, the question was stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz

And is also obviously not the way you see it either. You should take the same warning as is being given to another poster. Your promotion of a 14th Amendment that protects homosexual acts in public will get you banned.

From what I read so far from you... I’ll just say good riddens.


89 posted on 09/18/2010 1:14:49 PM PDT by TheBigIf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: Ted Grant

“potentially crimiinally culpable for engaging in particular homosexual acts in the jurisdiction”

even in private?

we’ve already established that certain public acts are illegal for all parties


90 posted on 09/18/2010 1:16:30 PM PDT by rosettasister
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: rosettasister

ooooh....Now your just tempting the admin mod...Not a wise thing to do...


91 posted on 09/18/2010 1:17:36 PM PDT by Michael Barnes (Call me when the bullets start flying.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur
"And no doubt you'll be out there peeking in windows and turning them in."

For someone to have such an awful thought speaks highly of yourself.

I don't want the homo agenda forced in my face, nor the face of children in any way shape or form.

Take illegal drugs for example. I would certainly NOT want an heroin or crack addict in my schools "preaching" how normal and good it is to be an addict.

I view homo's in the same regard.

92 posted on 09/18/2010 1:18:27 PM PDT by NoGrayZone (Please Lord, give America a 2nd chance. Through your Son Jesus Christ, Amen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: NoGrayZone

/nods head


93 posted on 09/18/2010 1:19:44 PM PDT by Michael Barnes (Call me when the bullets start flying.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: TheBigIf

“Your promotion of a 14th Amendment that protects homosexual acts in public will get you banned.”

Sorry, but I was not one of the six Justices on the SCOTUS who voted with the majority in Lawrence v. Texas.


94 posted on 09/18/2010 1:20:21 PM PDT by trumandogz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: rosettasister

I haven’t seen the proposed draft of the law, so I can’t say. And then there are Constitutional issues. So far, it seems that it is just a party position on a party platform, and that’s what I based my conclusions on.

I’m just basing my observations on the text of the article, not on any law (since no such law exists). You can’t establish anything about any proposed law since you haven’t seen the law yet. That has nothing much to do with what you feel ‘we’ve’ already established.


95 posted on 09/18/2010 1:20:44 PM PDT by Ted Grant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: Michael Barnes

Michael

you are not my judge


96 posted on 09/18/2010 1:21:13 PM PDT by rosettasister
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: Ted Grant

I just want this clarified.

And certain public acts are outlawed


97 posted on 09/18/2010 1:22:14 PM PDT by rosettasister
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: rosettasister; Jim Robinson
Jim Robinson Post 93

FR is a conservative site. We do not appreciate our members fighting against us on our conservative values and issues. If you wish to support homosexual marriage or homosexuals in the military or hate crimes against us for speaking out against government promotion of homosexuality that’s your business, but you’d better do it somewhere else and not on FR. If you value your posting privileges, that is. FR is pro-God, pro-life, pro-family, pro-marriage, pro-military, pro-traditional American conservatism and it is a privilege to post here. Those who support the godless liberal/Marxist destruction of our free society and our country are free to exercise their free speech rights elsewhere. I won’t stand in your way.

98 posted on 09/18/2010 1:22:21 PM PDT by DJ MacWoW (If Bam is the answer, the question was stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: rosettasister; DJ MacWoW

Would you care to explain what is so funny about DJ’s post #69?


99 posted on 09/18/2010 1:23:56 PM PDT by Las Vegas Ron (Moderates manipulate, extremest use violence, but the goal is the same.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: rosettasister

I can’t clarify what the proposed law would say. Only the political party can do that, if they try to work it through their legislature.

I don’t think that making homosexual acts illegal is a particularly good, or enforceable, idea, in any event. I was just pointing out that based on what the article said, homosexual acts would be criminalized, not the status of being a homosexual.


100 posted on 09/18/2010 1:24:11 PM PDT by Ted Grant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 401-406 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson