Posted on 09/19/2010 2:26:57 PM PDT by Nachum
Berlin - Chancellor Angela Merkel said Germans had for too long failed to grasp how immigration was changing their country and would have to get used to the sight of more mosques in their cities, according to a newspaper. (Snip) "Our country is going to carry on changing, and integration is also a task for the society taking up the immigrants," Merkel told the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung daily. "For years we've been deceiving ourselves about this. Mosques, for example, are going to be a more prominent part of our cities than they were before," she added.
(Excerpt) Read more at news24.com ...
Yeah, for years anyone who raised a red flag on this was called a racist. Now Angela is hinting that Germans will have to be Dhimmis in their own land. I wonder how the average German is going to swallow this?
This should go over big with the Germans.
We need to make churches a prominent part of their cites.
Germany imported the Muzzies to do their dirty work on the cheap, just like we did with the Mexicans. Time to reap the whirlwind.
I’d take Mexicans over muzzies any day
is she really favoring the change?? what is she smoking??
The difference is that Mexicans are not opposed to Western culture - they are Christians, descendants of the Western Christian culture of Spain, and while you may not like them, they aren’t out to kill us or take us over. The Muslims, on the other hand, would gladly crush every German Christian head into the ground.
And the Muslims here, in places such as Detroit and Minneapolis, will gladly do the same. They’ve already silenced bells in those cities and are broadcasting their Islamic howlings. And, incidentally, probably the majority are legal immigrants, brought in through family reunification, or illegals who overstayed a legal family reunification or student visa. So illegality is not necessarily the defining issue here. What is legal or illegal all depends on US immigration law.
Don’t criticize Merkel unless you intend to do something about our own immigration policy, which is heavily slanted towards Islamic countries (especially after Obama changed it by an administrative act the month after he was inaugurated).
Ping
Hows that free abortion working out for ya now Europe your government says just live with it; while bowing to the east.
Abortion = Proxy to Infanticide
Once enough momentum results in a negative birth-rate, the replacement society must be imported and supported on the backs of the citizenry for the political classes welfare.
Islam speaks to the average German just fine, antisemitism being the main engine for both. Let them raze Hofbrauhaus and put up a mosque instead, and you may see some grumbling...
As I recall the Germans under Hitler were quite friendly with muslim countries. The German people at the time were enthralled by Hitler. Difficult to understand Merkel softening on muslims when other countries are awakening to another middle ages problem.
“As I recall the Germans under Hitler were quite friendly with muslim countries. The German people at the time were enthralled by Hitler. Difficult to understand Merkel softening on muslims when other countries are awakening to another middle ages problem.”
This will not end well judging from history.
Germans trusted those elected to govern them (Merkel included) and now have one foot deep in the quicksand-style loss of their country.
Wonder how long it will be before "Octoberfest" is banned because it offends a certain segment of their non-alcoholic population?
The Germans do have methods for dealing with folks they don’t like.
No, wait, the very Muzzies now taking over that country have told me that the solution was a lie perpetrated by those Joooooooos.
Guess the Muzzies have nothing to worry about.
Let’s not call them mosques. Especially if they have no minaret. Let’s call them “rabats”. Rabat means many things, but it usually means “fortified place” or “fort”, and historically Muslims built a rabat as the front line in the land they were conquering.
The left is good at stealing language, we can shift the line by doing it too.
No more “mosque”, they are rabats- advance forts.
Taking up immigrants is one thing...invaders something else...
(The mosques are our barracks, the domes our helmets, the minarets our bayonets, the faithful our soldiers.)
...For years we've been deceiving ourselves about this.
You still are deceiving yourself and your countrymen Angela...or is that just the taqiyya talk of a dhimmi/collectivist?
Demographics is destiny. Auf Wiedersehen, Tchau Germany.
Fixed.
Only one problem, too often “they” don’t “integrate.”
Now that’s a problem.
Our immigration policy was designed by the Democrats back in 1965 and they have continued to bring in more “exotic” people all the time. When the Republicans get in, we have to pressure them to cut back on immigration. If the Repubs were smart, they would drive home the point to the nation, that the liberal Democrats with all of their politically correct policies were the ones who brought in millions of Muslims.
The immigration issue has to be brought up for discussion. No matter whether they calls us nativists, bigots, blah blah blah, we have to point out that the Democrat policies are endangering our country. The people will be on our side, everybody is fed up with the Muslims and all of their garbage. Stopping Muslim immigration is a sure fire winner for the Republicans.
We’ll “get used to mosques” when the Muslims “get used to” cartoons that ridicule their extremism, their murdering, their “god.”
The adoption of the name Movimiento Estudiantil Chicano de Aztlan signaled a new level of political consciousness among student activists. It was the final stage in the transformation of what had been loosely organized, local student groups, into a single structure and a unified student movement.Adamant rejection of the label "Mexican-American" meant rejection of the assimilation and accommodationist melting pot ideology that had guided earlier generations of activists. Chicanismo involves a crucial distinction in a political consciousness between a Mexican-American (Hispanic) and a Chicana/o mentality. El Plan de Santa Barbara speaks to such issues of identity politics by asserting: "The Mexican-American (Hispanic) is a person who lacks respect for his/her cultural and ethnic heritage.
So the hispanic "reconquista" is just that; invasion. Just as the jihad. And all the while the Catholic bedrock of Mexico is being replaced (and fast) with islam. Back in 2007, Mecha's leader had an Arabic name, Omar Medina.
A couple years back, a prominent German writer Gunther Grass advised young Germans to emigrate as soon as they could. He said the nation was dying and there was no reason to stay. He said he himself was too old to emigrate but the younger generation should seriously consider leaving for more friendly environs. For a loyal German, his advice is sad but prescient.
If the people don’t want the immigration, why can’t it be stopped??
Same question here in the US
Yet you’d think we would learn about the harsh long term consequences of the short term quest for cheap labor
Which will likely be the downfall of Western Civilization
You got something resembling evidence to back up that assertion?According to the CIA World Factbook, the numbers of Muslims in Mexico are so small Islam isn't even listed as a religion.
What percentage of Mexicans does your evidence show are Muslims, and how fast is it climbing?
“If the people dont want the immigration, why cant it be stopped??
Same question here in the US”
Because on a number of really IMPORTANT issues, the main parties in both countries are no different - one of those is immigration. Another is bailing out bankers and deadbeats, and another is spending like drunken sailors.
In America, we have the Tea Party to deal with that. In Sweden, they now have the “Democrats”. Other countries have their parties, but (obviously) we mean business.
Notice the use of the word “integration”. What exactly do they mean by that? The term “integration” is also used by the people behind the North American Union. This is language that is hinting of the bringing together of the Moslem countries into the European Union. They are forcing Islam down the throats of the European people because they want their empire to extend into the Moslem world. There is advanced discussion of bringing Turkey into the European Union. Even Sarkozy is talking about the “Mediterranean Union” which would include the Moslem countries along the south of the Mediterranean sea.
Looking at this with new eyes gives us some insight into the Bosnian/Serb/Kosovo conflict. Why did Clinton and Europe take the side of the Muslims against the Christian Serbs? Because they wanted to appease the Moslems and do not want any Christians standing up for their rights. They already had their plans in mind for including Turkey and other Moslem countries into their empire so they didn't want any dhimmi uprisings.
Look at how the European leaders are treating their own people. Basically giving them up to their Moslem tormentors. This is treachery on a grand scale.
It looks like anyone who wants to move up high in politics has to sign in to the globalist one world agenda. Merkle is no conservative because a true conservative would fight for her country's independence with her dying breath.
This gives me chills because it’s happening here. It isn’t good for Germany and it isn’t good for America. My country is being overrun.
I was getting ready to type the exact same thing.
The Muslim religion seems to be spreading faster than Christianity these days and that is a scary thought. Remember my friends that despite Obama’s denial of us ever being at war with Islam, the fact is that the Western world has been at war with Islam for over 700 years. When they took Jerusalem over hundreds of years ago they planted a victory mosque where they thought Solomon’s Temple was. If they get their mosque built on Ground Zero even peaceful Muslims will whisper to themselves that they are in the midst of taking over the Western world.
So much for you, Angie.
Future headline — Germany to Angel Merkel: get used to unemployment.
Thanks Nachum.
I believe it is because the government has been bought and paid for with Saudi wahabbist petrodollars. It is the only thing that can explain the continual calling of evil good and good evil.
Rofl. Please don't quote the CIA factbook at me. It's usually trailing a few years from realtime, and nowadays no one can know which way it leans. Which is, I suppose, why it's getting serious opponents.
Anyway, yes, there is evidence. It is there for the taking, feel free to do your own research. You can start with Hezbollah ops in Mexico, for example. Or, as I said, Mecha coordination with the PLO.
Can’t find numbers but..........
“Praying to Allah in Mexico: Islam Is Gaining a Foothold in Chiapas”
5/28/2005
By Jens Glüsing
http://www.spiegel.de/international/spiegel/0,1518,358223,00.html
“Islam, Sunnah y Salafiyyah en español
PRIMER ORGANIZACION SALAFI DE AMERICA LATINA”
“Mexico Discovers Islam”
by Michelle An-Nasr
A new generation of Muslims is introducing Islam to Mexicans.
http://www.beautifulislam.net/converts/mexico_discovers_islam.htm
“Mexico’s indigenous minority converting to Islam - 14 Mar 08”
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A5PpD9JqCsc
That is the chilling, but very simple, truth. (And it is DISGUSTING.)
That’s ridiculous. Hispanic immigration is NOT Muslim immigration. There was one place, Chiapas, that the left had taken over which did indeed have Muslim proseletysing - but the majority of those who “converted” were people who had first converted to Evangelical Protestantism.
They were Catholics in a left-wing diocese who went into these Protestant churches where everything is grouped around a pastor. When he leaves, changes or simply reveals himself to be a human being like anybody else, they are scandalized and leave Christianity. Mostly, they go into nothing; in Chiapas, the marabitun had sent people there, and many of them converted to Islam.
But then the Pope removed that bishop and appointed an orthodox Catholic, and now the bleeding to Protestantism and, subsequently, to Islam has been stopped.
I hope you're right, it would be the only place in the world where the jihad has been brought to a halt. Meanwhile, Hezbollah is training the Zetas, beheadings are becoming an epidemic, and the muslims are patting themselves on the back over the advances in Mexico.
She’s starting to sound like a “compassionate conservative” having done nothing about an “immigration problem” and now telling people to accept the consequences from those of the “religion of peace”.
What a crock!
Tell that to La Raza and the many 'hispanic' organizations that sued to have govt. documents in spanish.
Revisiting & BUMPING a good thread. Thanks to all posters. Anti-truth, anti-freedom, anti-individual, anti-life collectives will likely join forces. There is very little left to stop them.
You are getting both. Americans traded their liberty for a TV remote. ALL the TV networks in the USA are pro-Is*am because they have Sau*i investors, joint ventures or other multi billion deals.
Did you know that the Palestinians actually deny that the temple mount was the place where the Jewish temple was located? This is a common practice in Islam, after they conquer a people they rewrite history to wipe out any loyalty to a premoslem identity. Mohammed knew what mind-control meant long before anyone had invented the phrase. Mohammed, being a true cult leader wanted to own people body and soul.
One good thing—Americans are in a butt-kicking mood.
One good thing—Americans are in a butt-kicking mood.
This mosque story has really struck a cord among the American people and is one of those “no-brainers” that the average person can see as something that is so wrong and cannot be rationalized away by the usual bs artists in the media. Maybe it was a Godsend that will wake people up and educate them about the true insidious nature of Islam.
The average German thought it was good having cheap immigrant labor... that same German is starting to sense it wasn't that 'cheap' ...
Considering how much Latin culture adsorbed from the long rule of an Islamic Andalus, there isn't as much substantive difference as many might like to think. The Scriptures may be different, but similarities in the way they are held are striking.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.