Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

House Democrats Pass Bill to Grill School Children about Sexual Preference
Human Events ^ | Monday, September 20, 2010 | Connie Hair

Posted on 09/20/2010 6:45:30 AM PDT by kristinn

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201-204 next last
To: kristinn; 185JHP; AFA-Michigan; Abathar; Agitate; Albion Wilde; AliVeritas; Antoninus; ...
Homosexual Agenda Ping

Freepmail wagglebee to subscribe or unsubscribe from the homosexual agenda ping list.

Be sure to click the FreeRepublic homosexual agenda keyword search link for a list of all related articles. We don't ping you to all related articles so be sure to click the previous link to see the latest articles.

Add keywords homosexual agenda to flag FR articles to this ping list.

New Dem Motto:

We Molest the Nation's Children on the Backs of Taxpayers!

Just when you think it can't possibly get any worse, it gets worse. If the fiends didn't have money, they couldn't do this crap. TOSS THEM OUT OF OFFICE!

41 posted on 09/20/2010 7:43:57 AM PDT by little jeremiah (Courage is not simply one of the virtues, but the form of every virtue at the testing point.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bfh333

We have to start somewhere and fiscal issues are the first key to gaining control


Repeat LOUD and OFTEN. Fiscal conservatism will lead to social conservatism, we just need to be patient. Took a LONG time to go downhill, will take a long to to go uphill.


42 posted on 09/20/2010 7:44:34 AM PDT by PeterPrinciple ( Seeking the truth here folks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Rockiette

This is what happens when homosexuals are elected. Stupid voters get what they deserve.


43 posted on 09/20/2010 7:46:17 AM PDT by ilovesarah2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: kristinn

A homosexual is one who commits homosexual acts. Key word = SEXUAL. It then follows that these Administrators are sponsoring sex acts.


44 posted on 09/20/2010 7:46:52 AM PDT by Broker (Ecclesiastes 10:2 (NIV))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kristinn

According to Baldwin, the current “lack of cultural competency” among federal officials means that “we are left with gaping holes in our knowledge on LGBT (lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgendered) policy” resulting in “significant health disparities.”


Homosexuality and these other perversions are BEHAVIOURS! They are Not Race or gender.

Once you realize the truth that they are behaviours you can discuss causes and whether these are proper behaviours which the libs do not want us to discuss.


45 posted on 09/20/2010 7:48:22 AM PDT by PeterPrinciple ( Seeking the truth here folks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Notary Sojac
If we really did focus on fiscal issues, "Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) community health centers" would simply not exist, and therefore the problem would not have arisen.

Do you think it's OK to have "Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) community health centers" as long as they are exclusively staffed by those who share your own values?

Nope, but see, this brings up another point, which is the pure idiocy of trying to separate out "fiscal" and "social" issues, as if they were two mutually-exclusive sets of issues. I can just as easily ask a lot of social liberaltarians if they are willing to keep the DHHS, so long as it reflects their social values - and the answer from many of them would be (and in fact, HAS been) "Yes."

I've known libertarians who want to eliminate the federal Dept. of Education, but who then say they'd be entirely cool with allowing homosexual indoctrination in schools, once they're devolved to the states. That's just as bad as the federal DHHS doing it, and shows that they just don't "get it."

Conservatives need to work hand in glove to advance ALL of conservatism - not just one preferred little corner of it that they try to carve out as "theirs." Someone who is not willing to work just as hard for social conservatism, when one or more of those is the issue of the day, asthey are for fiscal conservatism cannot really be called a "conservative" and does not really have any place in the conservative movement, except as an opportunistic scavenger.

46 posted on 09/20/2010 7:49:31 AM PDT by Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus (is a Jim DeMint Republican. You might say he's a funDeMintalist conservative.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Leftism is Mentally Deranged

The Democrats envision a sex-positive socialist paradise in which children as young as 5 are getting it on with other children and adults.


47 posted on 09/20/2010 7:51:16 AM PDT by Soothesayer (“None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: concerned about politics
I am not against homeschooling. That said I also think to run is to give in. Parents need to empower their children to say no, walk out Al Gore movies, leave blanks where necessay on questionairs, decline sex-ed etc...

When the majority fail to participate the experiment will fail.

48 posted on 09/20/2010 7:57:44 AM PDT by fml
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah

said this before and I will say it again including to the teacher who was on here saying how she talked about homosexuality in her classroom and that is OK.

This kind of crap should not be in the classroom, it is not their business but that person’s and certainly I would hope the parents with some decent teachers speak up and take a stand.

The power of the school is from parents who stand together.
I’ve already talk to my kids teachers, told them that they had better not talk about this and I don’t want any books with it in either.

Every teacher I have spoken too agrees, though this is a more republican county.
The new principle tried to put on the obama speech in the school.
Trust me I got others too to call her and tell her we do nto want this and let her be on notice.
She the new principle was at first shocked I think , but even more so when she found that the teachers refused to put the speech on even though she got on the school speakers telling them to turn it on..

If this new principle thinks she is coming in here with a liberal agenda then she had better keep her bags packed as she won’t be around here for long


49 posted on 09/20/2010 8:11:15 AM PDT by manc (He goes to church and now this biased media says look he's a Christian.Biased media =joke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: massgopguy

I found that really amusing and scary at the same time.


50 posted on 09/20/2010 8:14:44 AM PDT by max americana (I post 1st..and show up last)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: kristinn

Democrats: The Child Molesting Party.””

This is the goal of nearly every male homo out there. Molesting young boys is a big part of the lifestyle and they will not be satisfied until they have full access to kids; either they will be able to molest them thru membership in child organizations or they will own them through the “adoption” process.


51 posted on 09/20/2010 8:23:40 AM PDT by Neoliberalnot ((Read "The Grey Book" for an alternative to corruption in DC))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kristinn

I don’t see what the educational/health application of this information is.

Something smells fishy here.


52 posted on 09/20/2010 8:38:41 AM PDT by conservative_crusader (The voice of truth, tells me a different story. The voice of truth says do not be afraid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: metmom; JenB; Clintonfatigued
This bill would affect everyone, even children:

Children who seek help at government-funded school health clinics would be asked whether or not they are gay, lesbian, bisexual or if they know their gender identity.

53 posted on 09/20/2010 8:49:05 AM PDT by Tired of Taxes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus
Conservatives need to work hand in glove to advance ALL of conservatism - not just one preferred little corner of it that they try to carve out as "theirs." Someone who is not willing to work just as hard for social conservatism, when one or more of those is the issue of the day, as they are for fiscal conservatism cannot really be called a "conservative" and does not really have any place in the conservative movement, except as an opportunistic scavenger.

**********************

Agreed.

54 posted on 09/20/2010 8:52:49 AM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus; Dr. Brian Kopp
Well said!!!

In fact, bears repeating:

Nope, but see, this brings up another point, which is the pure idiocy of trying to separate out "fiscal" and "social" issues, as if they were two mutually-exclusive sets of issues. I can just as easily ask a lot of social liberaltarians if they are willing to keep the DHHS, so long as it reflects their social values - and the answer from many of them would be (and in fact, HAS been) "Yes."

I've known libertarians who want to eliminate the federal Dept. of Education, but who then say they'd be entirely cool with allowing homosexual indoctrination in schools, once they're devolved to the states. That's just as bad as the federal DHHS doing it, and shows that they just don't "get it."

Conservatives need to work hand in glove to advance ALL of conservatism - not just one preferred little corner of it that they try to carve out as "theirs." Someone who is not willing to work just as hard for social conservatism, when one or more of those is the issue of the day, as they are for fiscal conservatism cannot really be called a "conservative" and does not really have any place in the conservative movement, except as an opportunistic scavenger.

55 posted on 09/20/2010 9:02:32 AM PDT by little jeremiah (Courage is not simply one of the virtues, but the form of every virtue at the testing point.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: fml; Tax-chick

You expect 6 year old children to refuse to go along with the program and become rebels?

This is insanity.

Throwing children into the gaping maw of public school is to open them to indoctrination of the worst kind.

Little children need their innocence unperverted, you can’t expect little children to know right from wrong in the face of horrible onslaughts like this, or to be able to stand up to authorities.

Children should respect their teachers; that’s why they should only have teachers that are worthy of respect.

It’s the adults’ job to fight this insanity, not little childrens’ job.


56 posted on 09/20/2010 9:12:49 AM PDT by little jeremiah (Courage is not simply one of the virtues, but the form of every virtue at the testing point.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: manc

Good for you. It is the parents’ jobs to protect children from leftist hateful nonsense. Kids cannot.


57 posted on 09/20/2010 9:14:16 AM PDT by little jeremiah (Courage is not simply one of the virtues, but the form of every virtue at the testing point.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: momtothree; Leftism is Mentally Deranged; kristinn
A child has no sexual orientation...
Young children have no concept about sexuality...


1. Young children will almost entirely identify a "preference" (ignoring adult connotations of sexual activity) for their own sex, thereby inflating homosexual numbers and maybe allowing sociologists to say we are all "born" homosexual and then socialized at puberty.

2. Once identified as homosexual pre-puberty, they can be steered in that direction by more overt role-playing, sexual education emphasizing that stated "preference", early homosexual experience with peers and adults and defending that early "choice" against attempts at "socialization" by parents (authority), peers (defined as "bullying") and even confusing the "religious right" (homosexuality means fewer abortions).
58 posted on 09/20/2010 9:14:35 AM PDT by UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide (REPEAL OR REBEL! -- Islam Delenda Est! -- I Want Constantinople Back. -- Rumble thee forth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide

Excellent points.


59 posted on 09/20/2010 9:18:24 AM PDT by Tax-chick (Christine O'Donnell, Sharron Angle, Luna Lovegood. Get it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: kristinn

>“This bill is about collecting data, no more, no less,” Baldwin said.<

Sure it is, you evil witch.


60 posted on 09/20/2010 9:20:18 AM PDT by Darnright (There can never be a complete confidence in a power which is excessive. - Tacitus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201-204 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson