Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NASCAR SPRINT Cup: AAA 400 at Dover International Speedway ~ Sunday 9/26/2010 1:00 pm/et ~ ESPN
Dover Speedway & Vavious embeded sources ^ | 9/21/2010 | NYTexan

Posted on 09/21/2010 12:26:48 AM PDT by NYTexan

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 441-448 next last
To: WestCoastGal; Roccus; tubebender

I sure would like to know what the specifics were, other than a 12th place car should not win in the Chase.


41 posted on 09/22/2010 2:26:56 PM PDT by SouthTexas ("Global Climate Disruption" = More bovine excrement)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: SouthTexas

After being a non-event (The 33 car from Richmond was “just barely legal” and NASCAR was checking with RCR to make sure they didn’t have a mistake on their build sheet) for a couple of days, the situation changed today when a 150-point, $150,000, 6-week crew chief/car chief suspension was announced based on violations from the New Hampshire car.

The primary part of the penalty (meaning the part besides actions detrimental to stock car racing) was

33 car body location specifications in reference to certified chassis did not meet #NASCAR-approved specs

The chassis is the tube frame that makes up the skeleton of the car. NASCAR specifies the chassis down to the exact size tube, wall thicknesses of the tube, and precise location. Prior to hanging the body, each chassis must be taken to the NASCAR R&D Center to be verified, which is done using a Romer arm. The chassis is then tagged with RFID tags that are scanned at the racktrack to ensure that no changes have been made.

After the chassis is certified, the team can hang the body. Instead of making measurements of the body directly, certain points are called out by their position relative to spots on the chassis. The violation was in the position of the bodywork, which suggests that any advantage that may have been gained was aerodynamic. A violation of the chassis might have been dealt with even more severely because the chassis is the primary protection mechanism for the driver.

If this is the same issue that their Richmond car received such intense scrutiny for, it makes sense. Cars are built weeks ahead of time, as the hauler has to get them to the race track Thursday night, so it is likely that the body was already hung on the New Hampshire car by the time NASCAR told RCR that there was an issue with the Richmond car.

That moves Bowyer from first to last in the Chase, and leaves him without two very important members of his crew for the next six weeks.


42 posted on 09/22/2010 2:38:48 PM PDT by WestCoastGal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: WestCoastGal

Per RCR person

The Richmond car that was “close” was “old” geometry. The cars RCR drivers drove at NHMS are their “new” stuff. #nascar

The chassis have to be approved by #nascar at the tech center before it can even be brought to the track.


43 posted on 09/22/2010 2:47:12 PM PDT by WestCoastGal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: WestCoastGal
Thanks for the update. They still don't make any sense.

Barely legal is legal, but wait, new rule, now it's illegal.

I like Bowyer, am I a major fan, no. I just think Nascar pushes the limits of sensibility at times in their quest for “equality/parity/whatever”. The car is checked before qualifying, was this one NOT measured? Were the chips NOT scanned? Did the driver/crew of the 33 mysteriously change the car during the race? All for an aero advantage on a short track?

OK, I'll stop now.

44 posted on 09/22/2010 3:45:02 PM PDT by SouthTexas ("Global Climate Disruption" = More bovine excrement)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: SouthTexas

Richard Childress Racing Statement Regarding NASCAR Penalty

WELCOME, N.C. (September 22, 2010) — The following is a statement from Richard Childress, president and chief executive officer of Richard Childress Racing, regarding NASCAR’s penalty on the No. 33 NASCAR Sprint Cup Series team after last week’s race in New Hampshire:

“First of all, I’d like to apologize to our sponsors, our fans and everyone at RCR for the situation that has resulted from this ruling. RCR has a long-standing reputation of integrity on and off the race track. We pride ourselves on working within the rules established by the sanctioning body.

NASCAR informed us after the Richmond race that we were very close to their maximum tolerances. They also told us they were going to take our New Hampshire car to the NASCAR Technical Center after that race. It doesn’t make any sense at all that we would send a car to New Hampshire that wasn’t within NASCAR’s tolerances. I am confident we fixed the area of concern and the New Hampshire car left the race shop well within the tolerances required by NASCAR.

>>>>>We feel certain that the cause of the car being out of tolerance by sixty thousandths of an inch, less than 1/16 of an inch, happened as a result of the wrecker hitting the rear bumper when it pushed the car into winner’s circle. The rear bumper was also hit on the cool down lap by other drivers congratulating Clint on his victory. That’s the only logical way that the left-rear of the car was found to be high at the tech center. We will appeal NASCAR’s ruling and take it all the way to the NASCAR commissioner for a final ruling, if need be.” (RCR)


45 posted on 09/22/2010 4:02:19 PM PDT by WestCoastGal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: WestCoastGal; SouthTexas; tubebender

Comment of the day on the NASCAR Yahoo race board:

“Thank you very much - Sincerely Chad Knaus”

The guy that has a beef w/this has to be Ryan Newman. I mean if the car was legal for the last race before the chase (which knocked out Newman) then how’s it illegal for the next race?? I also don’t understand, with such a servere penalty why they let him keep the win..


46 posted on 09/22/2010 4:14:39 PM PDT by happydogx2 (If you can look at a dog and not feel vicarious excitement and affection, you must be a cat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: happydogx2

Richmond was old chassis - NH was a complete newly built chassis per RC. - they changed all the noses, tails etc. on the bodies to have good cars for the Chase.


47 posted on 09/22/2010 4:38:18 PM PDT by WestCoastGal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: WestCoastGal

Turned out to be too good.

1/16th thousandth of an inch?? RC says it might have come from the push/hit by the truck when they ran outa fuel...and that he will appeal. The ruling certainly took some excitment out of the chase race.


48 posted on 09/22/2010 4:48:33 PM PDT by happydogx2 (If you can look at a dog and not feel vicarious excitement and affection, you must be a cat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: WestCoastGal

Good for RCR!!!


49 posted on 09/22/2010 5:13:23 PM PDT by SouthTexas ("Global Climate Disruption" = More bovine excrement)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: happydogx2

I also have issues with Knaus bashers while they ignore all the other violations by other crewchiefs/teams.


50 posted on 09/22/2010 5:15:36 PM PDT by SouthTexas ("Global Climate Disruption" = More bovine excrement)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: SouthTexas

The car or the Hot Babe driving???


51 posted on 09/22/2010 5:19:38 PM PDT by tubebender (Life is short so drink the good wine first...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: tubebender; happydogx2

I think we still have a functional amendment that gives me protection against self incrimination. Don’t we?


52 posted on 09/22/2010 5:22:51 PM PDT by SouthTexas ("Global Climate Disruption" = More bovine excrement)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: WestCoastGal

So why didn’t they tag it in the prerace inspection? It is very possible that a bump could tweak the setting by 1/16, .060. Were RCR crew members present during the lab inspection or did Dalby go in with a predetermined outcome ? Sounds like sour grapes for the win by a brash upstart to me...


53 posted on 09/22/2010 5:32:44 PM PDT by tubebender (Life is short so drink the good wine first...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: tubebender
The car passed all of pre-race inspections and the initial post race inspection at the track, Our family are huge Bowyer fans, charter members of his fan club, needless to say this is devastating and heartbreaking.
54 posted on 09/22/2010 7:03:04 PM PDT by 07Jack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: tubebender

Nascar told them at Richmond they would take the NH car for inspection, so why in the world would they cheat. I don’t believe Shane or RC would cheat to win.

Usually someone from team is present during inspection process.


55 posted on 09/22/2010 7:30:02 PM PDT by WestCoastGal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: WestCoastGal

HermieSadler

@AllWaltrip hey Champ, if the 33 got its car cerified before racing it, and passed inspextion on Friday and sunday at the track, what changed


56 posted on 09/22/2010 8:02:23 PM PDT by WestCoastGal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: glock rocks
1st?

And where is the Grok weather map? Slacker...

57 posted on 09/22/2010 8:55:28 PM PDT by NYTexan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: afnamvet; tubebender

Close...you win Tubebenders Okra!


58 posted on 09/22/2010 8:56:43 PM PDT by NYTexan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: stefanbatory
LOL...She's being portrayed as a Monster...
59 posted on 09/22/2010 8:58:50 PM PDT by NYTexan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: umgud

YW!


60 posted on 09/22/2010 8:59:35 PM PDT by NYTexan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 441-448 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson