Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Black Panthergate
IBD Editorials ^ | September 21, 2010 | Investors Business Daily staff

Posted on 09/21/2010 5:57:45 PM PDT by Kaslin

Justice: Despite administration denials under oath, documents obtained by a watchdog group indicate that the decision not to pursue a clear-cut case of voter intimidation was indeed a political decision.

It was perhaps the most clear-cut case of voter intimidation ever. On Election Day 2008, New Black Panther Party members King Samir Shabazz, Malik Zulu Shabazz and Jerry Jackson were videotaped intimidating voters as they stood, dressed in military garb, outside a Philadelphia polling place.

Their conduct was so egregious that the Justice Department of President Bush charged the three thugs with violations of the 1965 Voting Rights Act through intimidation, threats and coercion. When none of the defendants filed a response or showed up at a subsequent hearing, you'd have thought the Justice Department would have won its suit by default.

But a new administration brought a new, and somewhat jaundiced, perspective. Instead, the Justice Department of President Obama essentially dropped the case in May 2009, letting two of the three walk and issuing a weak injunction against King Shabazz. He was forbidden from showing up at another Philadelphia polling place with another nightstick and intimidating other voters for the next three years, an action that was already illegal. He is presumably free to do the same thing in, say, New Jersey in 2012.

The U.S. Civil Rights Commission wanted to know why the case wasn't pursued and if political considerations were involved. On May 14, Thomas Perez, assistant attorney general for civil rights, testified that there was no "political leadership involved in the decision not to pursue this particular case any further than it was" and it was only "a case of career people disagreeing with career people."

(Excerpt) Read more at investors.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Editorial; Government
KEYWORDS: agenda; americainperil; bho44; bhodoj; blackpanther; blackpanthergate; blackpantherparty; blackpanthers; doj; ericholder; nbp; nbpp; newblackpanthercase; newblackpantherparty; obama; thomasperez

1 posted on 09/21/2010 5:57:46 PM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
This case should be the metaphor (for all time) of the criminal Obama Administration.

Plus - some of these "Justice" Department officials need to be reassigned here - wearing khakis with a number on them.

2 posted on 09/21/2010 6:00:57 PM PDT by SkyPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot

wont matter.. I dont think many care


3 posted on 09/21/2010 6:05:11 PM PDT by dalebert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Adams told the commission that DOJ officials "over and over and over" showed "hostility" to prosecution of voter-intimidation cases involving "black defendants and white victims."

So according to Obama, Holder, et al, it is OK to only be concerned about the civil rights of one particular race, and completely disinterested in the civil rights of another race. Which basically means that everything we have heard about "civil rights" from the Democrats/Progressives has all been a lie.

4 posted on 09/21/2010 6:07:06 PM PDT by spodefly (This is my tag line. There are many like it, but this one is mine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

My wife says that Judicial Watch had a hand in this finding?


5 posted on 09/21/2010 6:08:53 PM PDT by tubebender (Life is short so drink the good wine first...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

6 posted on 09/21/2010 6:11:23 PM PDT by Bean Counter (Now what kind of a geroo are you anyway?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Lying under oath?

Sounds like someone needs to bring Justice to this Unjust Department.


7 posted on 09/21/2010 6:18:30 PM PDT by TigerClaws
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: spodefly

Haven’t you heard? Obama is post-racial.


8 posted on 09/21/2010 6:20:12 PM PDT by Henry Hnyellar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: dalebert

BS. I care! Lots!


9 posted on 09/21/2010 6:20:22 PM PDT by Tigerized (pursuingliberty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

So glad Marion Frances Berry is no longer a part of the Civil Rights Commision looking into this. I wonder what Thernstrom has to say now?


10 posted on 09/21/2010 6:24:50 PM PDT by Dutchgirl ("What I believe about God is the most important thing about me." A.W. Tozer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tigerized

I am talking movers and shaker that we send do dc..they dont care.


11 posted on 09/21/2010 6:28:49 PM PDT by dalebert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Nachum; markomalley; Carlucci; grey_whiskers; meyer; WL-law; Para-Ord.45; 70th Division; ...

Ping


12 posted on 09/21/2010 6:35:52 PM PDT by raptor22 (The truth will set us free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: raptor22

If this starts to get legs again, the NAACP will pass another useless resolution and their friends in the media will be right there to help divert attention away.

FREEPERS, DO NOT RISE TO THE BAIT! Just keep hammering away on the black pampers.


13 posted on 09/21/2010 6:40:44 PM PDT by cripplecreek (Remember the River Raisin! (look it up))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: dalebert
wont matter.. I dont think many care

Hey, dalebert, could you bend over so I can get a better view of your "Kick Me" tattoo? I want to see if it matches the "King of Defeatist Attitudes" one on your right arm.

14 posted on 09/21/2010 6:45:04 PM PDT by arasina (So there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot
This case should be the metaphor (for all time) of the criminal Obama Administration

Gary Aldrich does a pretty good job on the Clinton Administration in his book Unlimited Access

15 posted on 09/21/2010 6:45:18 PM PDT by immadashell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: tubebender

I haven’t heard that, but they would probably like to take credit for it


16 posted on 09/21/2010 6:47:19 PM PDT by Kaslin (Acronym for OBAMA: One Big Ass Mistake America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: arasina

The last time this story came up it mattered enough for the wookie to tun down to the NAACP and complain about the racist tea partiers. The next day the NAACP passed their meaningless resolution and it was all anybody could talk about even here at FR.

Meanwhile the voter intimidation case was forgotten just as it was about to land on Obama’s desk.


17 posted on 09/21/2010 6:51:11 PM PDT by cripplecreek (Remember the River Raisin! (look it up))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: immadashell
I read that book when it first came out.

The MSM when ballistic. They pulled out all the stops to try and discredit Aldrich.

I can't even remember what little sticks and stones they tried to use against him - probably something like he manufactured a certain fact or something. I do remember him appearing on Larry King, and King acted like his usual asshat self.

Aldrich's book destroyed liberal. He even put the spotlight on their bad manners, their cheapness (stealing frozen ice cream from the White House cafeteria), drug use, to their rudeness and sexual immorality.

Aldrich had to be destroyed.

He hit too close to home for them.

18 posted on 09/21/2010 7:14:52 PM PDT by SkyPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin; Grizzled Bear; ScoopAmma; Irisshlass; informavoracious; larose; RJR_fan; Prospero; ...
+

Freep-mail me to get on or off my pro-life and Catholic List:

Add me / Remove me

Please ping me to note-worthy Pro-Life or Catholic threads, or other threads of general interest.

19 posted on 09/21/2010 7:21:01 PM PDT by narses ( 'Prefer nothing to the love of Christ.')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: arasina

jeez guys cant anyone have an opinion besides you?


20 posted on 09/21/2010 8:00:08 PM PDT by dalebert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot
Regnery should reissue it in 2012 when hillary gets the nod.
21 posted on 09/21/2010 10:38:05 PM PDT by immadashell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: dalebert
I am talking movers and shaker that we send do dc..they dont care.

I think Eric Holder may care a lot next year when he's up on the Hill testifying about this, and Michelle Bachmann is asking him a lot of really direct questions with his testicles in one hand and a 10" straight razor in the other.

22 posted on 09/22/2010 2:56:50 AM PDT by lentulusgracchus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: lentulusgracchus; dalebert
I hear ya daleburt, and believe me, I am cynical too about depending on "scandal" to win your political wars for you. The left plays dirty with manufactured scandals all the time. The Joe--Wilson-Yellow-Cake-Valerie-Plame-I-WAS!-A-Covert-Agent-No-Nepotism-Scooter-Libby-Perjury-Trap "scandal" is but one such example. That was a non-non scandal that the MSM and the Democrats went nuts over.

I remember back in the 80's, when the networks ruled the airwaves, and the MSM went nuts over "Iran-Contra." That was a joke as well. Reagan "violated the spirit of the obscure 'Boland Ammendment' to an Authorization Bill." Give me a break. It was a foreign policy dispute between Congress and the White House, with Congress supporing Communists in Central America. Once the American People found out more and more facts, the MSM and the Democrats had no choice but to pound the table even louder.

I am cynical today too, but here is the difference with the Black Panther Voting Intimidation Scandal.

1. A legitimate crime was committed

2. Not only are there witnesses, there is videotape

3. The Obama Administration did not just intervene, they threw the case out because of racial reasons, and then lied about their involvement

4. If the GOP controls the House next term, the majority party has subpoena power, and that is HUGE! (the minority party has no such authority). The Democrats know this, and it worries the hell out of them. Contempt of Congress and Lying to Congress can still get you in a heap big pile of trouble. Ask Roger Clemens.P> So, while I wouldn't bet my Easter candy on it, I will say that in a few months, Eric Holder and his clowns are going to be a tad more nervous about the crime and cover up they committed.

Some lower underling will probably be tossed from the boat by the fascist regime.

But then again.....you never know what you will find until you start digging.

23 posted on 09/22/2010 3:41:15 AM PDT by SkyPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot

only if rino’s are willing to dig..


24 posted on 09/22/2010 5:45:02 AM PDT by dalebert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Bean Counter

ROTFLMAO!


25 posted on 09/24/2010 2:09:35 PM PDT by Rurudyne (Standup Philosopher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson