Skip to comments.Study: 1 in 5 urban gay and bisexual men got HIV
Posted on 09/23/2010 9:57:06 AM PDT by Free ThinkerNY
click here to read article
It can't be the source, they're made here in good ole Lafayette Indiana. But they're all 4wd, maybe lesbians are worried about getting stuck in the ditch?
“Start treating this like cigarette smoking.”
We’re doing quite the opposite. Most people with HIV/AIDs are poor or near poor. ObamaCare opens up Medicaid (for the first time) to non-disabled adults without children so long as their income is below 133% of poverty. This will automatically qualify a sizable number with HIV/AIDS for free medical care.
The new rules banning insurance companies from denying coverage to those with pre-existing conditions or charging higher premiums based on health status also will benefit those with HIV/AIDS who today are either denied coverage outright or must pay much higher premiums to get it.
Since the medical costs of HIV/AIDS exceed $10,000 a year, the net effect of all these changes is to reduce the “price” of having HIV/AIDS. What we know from Econ 101 is that when you lower the price of something, people demand more of it. It’s a safe bet that HIV/AIDS prevalence will rise as a consequence of ObamaCare, but don’t expect Dems to advertise this sad reality.
Freepmail wagglebee to subscribe or unsubscribe from the homosexual agenda ping list.
Be sure to click the FreeRepublic homosexual agenda keyword search link for a list of all related articles. We don't ping you to all related articles so be sure to click the previous link to see the latest articles.
Add keywords homosexual agenda to flag FR articles to this ping list.
If the same percentage of heterosexuals routinely had sex with hundreds of anonymous partners then one in five heterosexuals would have HIV too.
That is politically incorrect terminology. You should use the non-judgmental terms She (womyn), He (men), It (eunuchs), and Trans-gendered (either or both), or the abbreviation S.H.I.T.
60% of the reported STDs in this country come from homosexuals which only comprise 1.5% of the population.
They are not “gay”, they are homosexual. And the homosexual lifestyle is one of rampant promiscuity. Google “Bug catchers”.
Thanks for the ping Bill!
There are studies. They just aren't reported. Lifespan is about 50 years old.
What other diseases do Gays, Queers, Lesbians, etc. contract?
Gay bowel syndrome, anal cancer, shigellosis, proctitus, MRSA, parasites, just to name a few.
That’s part of it, but it’s also the type of sex that is a problem.
Can you imagine how cheap our health insurance would be if we were asked our sexual preference and charged accordingly?
On a similar note....
Rush was explaining today about how Obamacare will not deny anyone coverage. No sir.
But.... when it comes to treatment; thats a different matter.
Avastin for instance. Powerful drug used in fighting breast cancer. Wholesale cost is $7,700 per month. But it works.
But the FDA and Obamacare can’t afford that. So guess what? It’s gone.
Watch out Barack!
guaranteed to be skewed to lower numbers
How much to treat AIDS per month? I tried googling it, but most sites seem pro-homosexual and I’m not sure that their numbers are correct. Many have figures for Africa only.
I don’t know if taxpayer funded treatment for Aids is widespread. My friend died from kidney failure due to Aids because he couldn’t afford the meds.
When AIDS first surfaced in the early 80s, I wrote a letter to the editor saying that basic Public Health measures should be instituted and people with AIDS should be quarantined. Man, did I get a load of responses to that. Other docs upset, county medical society, other counter letters to the editor. I wonder if that were done in the early 80s where we would be with HIV/AIDS today?
I confess that I am no authority on either, so I’m stumped.
I’m very sorry to hear about your friend.
Wow. You weren’t kidding.
It’s as if Google doesn’t want us to know the cost of AIDS.
Either Google or the wankers in Washington DC. Either way - it’s none of our business, right? If you have to ask - you can’t afford it.
Bottom line is - women with breast cancer? Too bad. Can’t afford to help ya.
Queers with AIDS? Not their fault, so yeah - Unlimited resources for them.
FOR THIS REASON GOD GAVE THEM OVER TO DEGRADING PASSIONS; for their women exchanged the natural function for that which is UNNATURAL (Literally "against nature"),
and IN THE SAME WAY ALSO THE MEN ABANDONED THE NATURAL FUNCTION OF THE WOMAN AND BURNED IN THEIR DESIRE TOWARD ONE ANOTHER, MEN WIT MEN COMMITTING INDECENT ACTS AND RECEIVING I N T H E I R O W N P E R S O N S THE DUE PENALTY OF THEIR ERROR. (Romans 1:25-27, Emphasis added)
God keeps His word; Homosexuality is sin and the sign from God that He has given that individual over to "degrading passions" because they have "exchanged the truth of God for a LIE, and worshiped and served THE CREATURE rather than the Creator".
According to Romans 1:27; Aids is the "due penalty" of their sinfulness.
While homoseuxals may go on to lose their lives as a direct result of their sinful lifestyle, God still holds out the hope of the salvation of their eternal souls if they will believe on the Lord Jesus Christ for the forgiveness of their sins and after their salvation, repent of their wicked lifestyle.
I was surprised.
He knew the risks. As much as my husband and I loved him, he behaved stupidly. And selfishly.
That's not true. Our friend died in 2005 at age 47 from Aids related kidney failure because he couldn't afford the meds.
How much were the meds?
If I understand correctly, it’s not unusual, particularly for male homosexuals, to be promiscuous and to exhibit risk-taking behaviour.
Yes, because there’s very little chance of encountering blood in military service. s/
Don never said. He was a veteran and I know he got SS when he became too ill to work. But the VA wouldn't pay for his meds. (I don't blame them) And his family couldn't either.
Yes. He advertised on AOL. Idiot!
You have to understand that our whole family loved him but there's no way to excuse stupid.
I think a lot of that goes on. What can one do?
Nothing. You can’t stop people from being stupid. The only thing we can do is make sure they DON’T get a “stamp of approval” for that lifestyle.
They must not have gone to Virginia Highlands.
I agree with that.
Those studies have been done.
Oral sex can be just as dangerous,especially when none of them are especially concerned about any possible STD’s or genital warts,which they can check for.People can develop throat cancer through oral sex,especially when they were with 5 or more partners. People can get STD’s in their mouth and throat!
Homosexual acts and the lifestyle are by their very nature an out of control way of life.
That is why so many homosexuals get AIDS and a myriad of other horrible illnesses. “Gay monogamy” is rare to nil. And rare left town.
And they are still throwing a temper tantrum because they can’t donate blood and give us their disease!
Thanks. After reading your post, I just threw up in my mouth a little.
Obama or Rahm , Which one or Both!
this raises a significant point.
are these sexual fetishes an URBAN behavior?
Then put some names and faces to those needless early deaths. Goggle Turtle Creek Corale and go to their "memorials" link. Make note of the ages of those who "passed away quietly at home" and you will see for yourselves the truth about homosexuality, from their own accounts.
I already know the truth.
Many have; both in this age and at the time the scriptures were written. "And such were some of you, but ye were washed..."
that too...we cared for one several years ago when none of his dandy pals would
a hard death..sadly
I just told my wife that's amazing. If you watch any TV, you would think the US population is 25% homosexual, 50% Black, 25% Hispanic and about 25% White. . . Don't watch much TV here. . .
Well, in NYC, LA, and SF, (where the lib writers live) the gay percentage is probably much higher than the national average.
On TV, though, they do have a tendency to have any roles that portray authority figures (judges, chief doctors, etc), particularly bit parts, being cast by blacks, women, or preferably black women.
I believe that the military is checking for HIV status as part of a routine medical screening before induction and rejecting the infected, but that might be deemed "discrimination" in a future gay friendly military.
I don't think that bleeding from wounds will cause a lot of HIV infections; but the perception of risk would certainly inhibit contact with men of uncertain HIV status which might inhibit combat effectiveness.
Another concern is with emergency blood transfusions which are done in combat situation where FDA approved blood products are not available or whole blood is preferred. See Emergancy Blood Transfusions
Why not, if infected blood splatters or spills on other people with open wounds, cuts, abrasions etc. That's why EMT and other health workers are so dang careful! They don't want to get AIDS or other blood borne illnesses.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.