It would probably fare as well as it did in Springfield.
Posted on 09/25/2010 4:28:28 PM PDT by Willie Green
With anti-rail activists whipped into a frenzy over threats that passenger rail services pose to Wisconsin and the state's finances, it's time to step back and take a closer look. Are rail opponents onto something, or are they on something?
Rail opponents rail against the cost of rail. They would like to have the money for rail either returned to Washington or spent on highways. Dream on. The $810 million is a part of a larger plan to restore intercity passenger rail across the United States. This is a federal project that won't be derailed by Wisconsin politics. Restoring rail is expensive, but transportation projects are expensive. The Zoo Interchange will cost more than $2 billion to reconstruct. The Marquette Interchange was close to $1 billion. Where's the outrage over that spending?
In any case, the money can't be spent on highways, and even if it was sent back to Washington, it would be reallocated to another state to build their rail system - leaving Wisconsin in the dust. (We also would be sending millions of our tax dollars to another state to build rail instead of us getting the hundreds of millions from other states.)
The core of rail opponents' argument seems to focus on the $54 question: Can we afford the annual operations costs of the added service? Those annual costs will amount to around $6 million a year. That amounts to one-fifth of one cent of our gas tax. So when a driver fills up with 20 gallons of gasoline at $2.70 per gallon, the bill will comes to $54. Just .04 (yes, 4 cents) out of that $54 will go to pay for intercity rail.
Their argument also assumes that there are absolutely no benefits associated with the 4-cent investment that comes with a $54 purchase. It assumes that no one will benefit from jobs created to build the service. That no one will benefit from the development that occurs around rail stations. And that no one will benefit from being able to relax rather than fight traffic on the interstate.
Opponents also like to say that the train fares will be unaffordable. According to the state Department of Transportation, one-way fares will be between $20 and $30 for the ride from Madison to Milwaukee. Compare that to the cost of driving. Using federal reimbursement rates for mileage, driving the 78 miles between Madison and Milwaukee costs $39. That means taking rail saves between $9 and $19 each trip. It saves a lot more for someone in Madison taking the train to Mitchell International Airport to catch a flight due to the saved costs of parking. And it will boost traffic at Mitchell.
It seems like there's a lot of rage over just 4 cents out of every $54.
The real issue seems to center on divisive politics: Since most people won't ride the train, let's not build it. Imagine if that argument really took hold on other issues. Most people in Wisconsin won't use the Zoo Interchange, so let's save $2 billion and not rebuild it. Most people in Wisconsin won't drive on I-39 between Madison and Janesville, so let's save a billion dollars by not building that. The argument can be extended to schools, libraries and other public services that we can't afford to lose.
Wisconsin needs smart investments to grow and to be competitive with other states and other regions. Passenger rail is one of those investments. Passenger rail serves those who would rather relax - or work - on intercity trips. Rail stations attract development that adds value to host communities. Rail becomes an attractive option to driving as gas prices rise. Rail provides mobility to those who cannot drive.
Passenger rail has been a priority for many leaders in Wisconsin's business community for decades. It has also been a priority for one of Wisconsin's most irrepressible cheerleaders, former Republican Gov. Tommy Thompson - proving that rail does not have to be a partisan issue.
Sadly, opponents to rail are more interested in creating wedge issues than looking at the real potential of rail service. Otherwise, they would look at the 4-cent investment of a $54 purchase through a different lens.
It's time to stop the bickering and move ahead with an eye on Wisconsin's future.
Steve Hiniker is executive director of 1000 Friends of Wisconsin.
Should be simple, make it economically feasible and they will ride.
But you can’t and they won’t.
“Passenger rail is one of those investments.”
A very very poor investment.
Is that what you think FreeRepublic is all about?
Posting thoughtless socialist nonsense and trying to grow government because you have some kind of bizarre train fetish?
HELL NO!!!!
It would probably fare as well as it did in Springfield.
Spain spent $1 Trillion on their FAIL.
The future lies in more canals baby!
I’m thinking that mom didn’t buy you the train set you wanted when you were a little boy. Go buy yourself one.
Buy a clue willie. There’s a reason PRS used the color red, the traditional commie color, just for you.
That's ME... an INDEPENDENT grass-roots conservative.
I don't kowtow to the self-promoting polidiots who claim to be our "leaders".
“In any case, the money can’t be spent on highways, and even if it was sent back to Washington, it would be reallocated to another state to build their rail system - leaving Wisconsin in the dust. (We also would be sending millions of our tax dollars to another state to build rail instead of us getting the hundreds of millions from other states.)”
Now there’s an impressive argument. It’s a boondoggle, but it’s OUR boondoggle, so let’s do it!
driftdiver wrote (to Willie the resident Green):
Should be simple, make it economically feasible and they will ride.
But you can’t and they won’t.
You are thinking conventionally. Think like a Rat who hates the US and hates capitalism and hates the freedom that oil allows you to have and you will come up with “cap and trade” which will quadruple the cost of gasoline and electricity and FORCE you to take the train.
There’s a reason PRS used the color red, the traditional commie color, just for you.”
WRONG. The red is to indicate what a money loser rail is ;-)
If you can't deal with freedom maybe you can pimp for the Chinese.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.