Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sneak Preview: The Hijacking of the 2010 Election
American Thinker ^ | 9/27/10 | Jack Cashill

Posted on 09/27/2010 12:40:39 AM PDT by American Dream 246

Through a combination of massive, Somali-driven voter fraud, stunning Election Board incompetence, and the willful blindness of the Kansas City Star, machine Democrat J.J. Rizzo managed to beat conservative Democrat Will Royster by one vote in a Missouri State House primary on August 3.

There is no Republican running in this heavily Democratic, multi-ethnic Kansas City district. The Democratic nominee will face only a seriously outgunned Libertarian in the November election, and truth be told, Royster may be to the right of the Libertarian.

What the Democratic machine and the Star, which endorsed Rizzo, did not count on was for the intrepid Royster to challenge the election in court. In so doing, he has provided a sneak preview on how a desperate Democratic Party will attempt to neutralize the will of the people this November, and not just in Kansas City.

Royster, a retired Navy fighter pilot and all-around good citizen, asks a fundamental question: "If we won't let Somalis hijack our ships, why do we let them hijack our elections?" As many as a hundred Somalis voted, nearly all of them illegally, likely all of them for Royster's opponent, in a House district in which only 1,300 people showed up to vote.

The trial on September 7 in Jackson County, Missouri Circuit Court revealed several disturbing trends, some of which can be corrected by election day, some of which cannot.

First to testify was Lindy Hobkins, a Republican supervisory election judge. As she related, a group of Somalis came into her Kansas City election site led by one Somali man.

"They were unable to communicate on the most basic levels," said Hobkins of the Somalis. To help his voters along, the leader "left the premises, went outside to where the electioneers are out at the appropriate space allotted for them, and he brought in a sign for Mr. Rizzo." Hobkins continued: he "held it up and pointed at it and said this one, this one, this one."

In a disturbing little twist, David Raymond, the attorney for the Kansas City Election Board, grilled Hobkins as though she were a hostile witness. After she acknowledged that the Somalis were all somehow registered to vote, Raymond asked snidely, "Do you believe these voters should be disenfranchised?"

Hobkins was more than a match for Raymond. She and her husband had been helping refugees resettle. "The biggest deterrent to them becoming citizens, because they all want to be American citizens when they come here," she noted, "is that they do not have a handle on the language to be able to pass the test."

I checked the rules for citizenship. According to the official site for French-speakers (sorry, I don't speak Somali), an individual has to "connaître l'anglais et être au courant de l'histoire et du gouvernement des États-Unis." This translates to "know the English language and be current in the history and government of the United States." I cannot imagine that the requirements for Somalis are any different.

Hobkins knew the law. "How could they be registered to vote," she asked Raymond, "if they did not know how to speak English on any level?" Other than Hobkins, Royster, and Royster's attorney, no one else involved -- the Democratic Party, the Star, the Election Board, the trial judge -- expressed the slightest interest in the answer to this question.

Wendy Jones, an election judge at a separate polling place, provided even more damning testimony. "Did you notice groups of Somali voters entering the premises?" Royster's attorney asked. "Oh my gosh, all day long," she answered. When asked how many voters she saw, Jones answered, "To be honest, more than 50. That's the truth, your honor, more than 50."

According to the law, as the Republican co-director of the Election Board would testify, a person "with a disability or who cannot read or write" must state his disability under oath, sign and date a voter assistance card, and then have two judges sign and date the card. This voter can be assisted only by a judge or by a person the voter has sworn to be a family member. This procedure is usually reserved for the blind or seriously disabled.

Of the fifty-plus Somalis at Jones' polling place, not a single one was asked to sign a voter assistance card despite the fact that they all needed assistance from their "interpreters." Said Jones, "I witnessed myself seeing [the interpreters] fill out the ballots, actually fill out the ballots and actually tell the people ... where to fill it out at, what to sign."

When the interpreters, four of them, were asked why the Somali voters needed help, according to Jones, "Someone said they were blind, some of them said they couldn't read, some of them said they couldn't write. These are the excuses all day long that we had for these four individuals to vote with them and for them."

When Jones appealed to the Democratic supervisory judge for help, he reportedly told her, "You know, we all just want to make a little money here and just get out, just make the best of it and just -- let's go home."

Several other election judges testified, and none of them disputed what Jones and Hobkins said. A little unnerving was that other than Hobkins and Jones, the election judges had a hard time getting their nouns and verbs to agree. The collective ignorance of election law from top to bottom in the Kansas City Election Board stuns the observer.

One Somali did testify. An employee of the Somali Foundation, Abdul Kadir Sheikh told the court, under oath, of course, that he had taken Election Day off work because his wife was expecting a baby that day. Sheikh, allegedly a citizen, said that he had gone to Jones' polling site to vote but could not find his name on the voter rolls and so did not vote.

It just so happened, though, that while at the polling place, another Somali man approached Sheikh and asked for help voting. Sheikh obliged. That was it. As it happened, his baby was not born that day after all. "We didn't have any experience," Shiekh told the court. It was his first child.

One doubts that Sheikh will ever be challenged on his word, but Royster had already collected affidavits from two other poll watchers at that same site. Said one, "I personally witnessed Abdul Kadir Sheikh escort approximately (30) Somali voters into the polling place." A second person saw Sheik "sign their names in the registration book." This person claimed to have seen "more than 30" such people.

At the end of the day, Judge Stephen Nixon, a product of the same machinery that produced the Election Board, ruled against Royster. No new election, no serious recount.

Nixon took the same position that Rizzo's attorney had taken in his question to the Republican co-director. "Should a qualified voter, an American citizen, if you will, should they be disenfranchised, that is, should their vote not count because a judge forgot to initial the ballot[?]" As Nixon saw it, these good Somali citizens should not be "disenfranchised" -- the Democrat word du jour--because of multiple judges' errors. Royster is appealing.

The Kansas City Star has given this challenge only the slightest coverage. And in no article in a print edition has the word "Somali" appeared in relationship to the controversy.

In November, rest assured, the Somali vote and that of others of dubious citizenship will be turned against Republicans. There is a way for readers to fight this. Call your local Election Board today. Sign up to be a judge or a poll watcher. Ask for an inner-city precinct. And make sure you know the law better than your Democratic counterpart does. It won't be hard.

TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government; Miscellaneous; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: acorn; fraud; immigration; importingterror; invasion; islam; military; november2010; obama; palin; religion; seiu; terrorism; usflag; voterfraud

1 posted on 09/27/2010 12:40:46 AM PDT by American Dream 246
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: American Dream 246

How come all these people who don’t even speak english are American citizen anyway? And if they are not, then how come everybody is protecting them and allow them to vote without even asking for their ID??? It seems that everybody was going out of their way to help them? And for us, poor white citizens, we get the black panther treatment. Sick of that PC which is destroying us. SICK OF IT!!!

2 posted on 09/27/2010 12:45:11 AM PDT by American Dream 246 (Open your eyes. Freedom is not a one day fight. Enemies of Freedom are legion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: American Dream 246

Slowly but surely becoming a third world country in many ways .

3 posted on 09/27/2010 1:06:16 AM PDT by sushiman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: American Dream 246

We’re talking about Kansas City here. Between the fraud that goes on every election in KC and in St Louis you have people like Clair Mc Caskill elected.

4 posted on 09/27/2010 1:08:13 AM PDT by Old Retired Army Guy (tHE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Old Retired Army Guy

Jimmy Carter, calling Jimmy Carter. We have a fraudulent election taking place.

Oh forget it, it would be WORSE if he gets involved.

5 posted on 09/27/2010 2:06:20 AM PDT by NTHockey (Rules of engagement #1: Take no prisoners)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: American Dream 246
This voter fraud is only now being exposed as "widespread":

Citizens' Group Helps Uncover Alleged Rampant Voter Fraud in Houston
6 posted on 09/27/2010 2:08:46 AM PDT by Tainan (Cogito, ergo conservatus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: American Dream 246

Yes, indeed, I also want to know why all these people who can’t even speak English are allowed to vote. Where did they come from? Why are they here? Which Democratic administration, policy, presidential order allowed hundreds or thousands or tens of thousands of people from the wonderful country of Somali to invade our land? Did they bring skills with him that the United States needs? Can a code? Are the artists? Or do they rape and murder each other and us indiscriminately?

Thanks, Democrats, for ruining our country.

7 posted on 09/27/2010 2:31:24 AM PDT by DontTreadOnMe2009 (So stop treading on me already!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Tainan
I personally believe that the dims are incapable of holding fair elections, given that they have been perpetrating such prolific voter fraud for so long that it has to be ingrained into their inherent political philosophy by now.

It's like the guy who lies so much that he doesn't even realize he is lying anymore...

8 posted on 09/27/2010 3:20:15 AM PDT by EnigmaticAnomaly ("Mantra of the left: 'It's only okay when WE do it.'")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Tainan

They get a few points by fraud to win the close ones.

9 posted on 09/27/2010 3:31:29 AM PDT by screaminsunshine (counter revolutionary)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: DontTreadOnMe2009
Yes, indeed, I also want to know why all these people who can’t even speak English are allowed to vote.

ICBW, but I believe it started in NYC back in the 60's. It was determined that speaking, reading and understanding English was too much of a burden to place on Puerto Ricans (American citizens) as a prerequisite to voting.

10 posted on 09/27/2010 4:57:39 AM PDT by Roccus (......and then there were none.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: American Dream 246

It’s time to deploy an armed officer at every poling place, that should scare off the illegals...

11 posted on 09/27/2010 5:04:15 AM PDT by phockthis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sushiman

Amen...we are fast becoming a Banan republic....WITHOUT the BANANAS!!

12 posted on 09/27/2010 5:13:56 AM PDT by Ann Archy (Abortion......the Human Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Ann Archy

My wife is a precinct judge, my mother is a Republican Committeeman for our county which is about as red as they come. They have all been warned by representatives from our Secretary of State that every single move they make will be watched by the Democrats and the slightest questionable decision will be used for a complaint.

It seems the Democrats are going to push this tactic hard in any close election district that even their own poll workers are upset enough over this that some are warning our side what to expect.

It’s going to be bloody this November, we didn’t hear a peep in 2008 but this year it’s going to be a massive voter fraud claims by the dems when they lose.

13 posted on 09/27/2010 6:06:51 AM PDT by Abathar (Proudly posting without reading the article carefully since 2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson