Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Investigate Racism in the Obama Justice Department
Natiunal Review Online ^ | September 28, 2010 | An drew McCarthy

Posted on 09/28/2010 5:33:40 AM PDT by libstripper

Those who read this space know I am not a fan of the Republicans’ vaunted “Pledge to America.” I’m for simple pledges, the kind that get back to basics. If the Republican party is interested in making a pledge like that — a pledge that will resonate with the vast majority of the American people — here’s a suggestion: Promise an unwavering commitment to the principle of equal protection of the law for every American citizen. Promise, therefore, that Congress will investigate weighty allegations that the Obama Justice Department is engaged in racist law-enforcement practices.

Promise, moreover, that any executive-branch high official who has conspired to deny American citizens equal protection, or who has obstructed justice in an effort to cover up such a conspiracy, will be impeached and removed from office.

(Excerpt) Read more at nationalreview.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Editorial; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 0bamasmosque; 0cajones; ac0rn; boozer; coke; d0g; doj; doper; drugs; impeachment; junkie; justice4cokeheads; m00chelle; mask0f0bama; maybealittlebl000000; maybealottabl0000000; meechelle; mosque0f0bama; obama; racism; rezko; snowman; spain4just750000day; stash4baraq0bama; victorymosque; wagya4only100pound; wideload; wright
Now we have some really solid grounds for imeaching HOlder and Obama. FTA:

The Constitution guarantees all Americans equal protection under the law. The civil-rights laws, moreover, make it a crime for government officials to deprive “any person” — not any black or minority person, but any person, period — of “any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States.” It is a grave violation of law for the Justice Department to practice racial discrimination in deciding which cases it will bring, to determine that Americans of one race or class are not entitled to the same protection as all Americans.

That’s not just politicization of the Justice Department. It is criminalization of the Justice Department. Under the Constitution, it is Congress’s obligation to stop it. The current Congress obviously won’t do its duty. Americans will strongly support congressional candidates who pledge to right that wrong.

1 posted on 09/28/2010 5:33:48 AM PDT by libstripper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: libstripper

To these Imbeciles it is impossible for a Black to be racist. Just ask they will admit it.


2 posted on 09/28/2010 5:45:17 AM PDT by screaminsunshine (counter revolutionary)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: libstripper; Jet Jaguar; Lady Jag; Slings and Arrows; maggief; Dog; BP2; Candor7; martin_fierro; ...

ping!


3 posted on 09/28/2010 5:47:16 AM PDT by bitt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: libstripper

Yes, it is the criminalization of the Justice Department, but even if there is a Republican House and hearings, we can look forward to stonewalling by the Administration, refusal to honor subpoenas, invocation of executive privilege whenever it can be stretched to cover, demonization of Republican committee inquiries by the MSM as partisan witch hunts, and on and on and on. In short, the November elections are just the beginning of a very long and hard road to take back the country. November may also be the beginning of a real constitutional crisis which leads to Congressional decrees that Obama responds to with a version of the old aphorism of “you and what army.”


4 posted on 09/28/2010 5:47:21 AM PDT by Truth29
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: screaminsunshine

The funny thing is, their excuse or “reasoning” for their assertion that blacks can’t be racist is

“they don’t have the power to impose their racism on others”.

Now they do. But they still can’t be racist...


5 posted on 09/28/2010 5:49:06 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a (de)humanist and a Satanist is that the latter knows who he's working for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Truth29

Impeach him.

And when the Senate refuses to convict,
impeach him again.

Rinse and repeat.


6 posted on 09/28/2010 5:50:02 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a (de)humanist and a Satanist is that the latter knows who he's working for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: libstripper

For some reason, the accusation that Obama is a racist REALLY upsets lefties.

7 posted on 09/28/2010 5:52:34 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a (de)humanist and a Satanist is that the latter knows who he's working for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MrB
“they don’t have the power to impose their racism on others”.

I've always cringed at that quote. It's total bullcrap. Two blacks strolling down the street who decide that a lone white walking past them has not shown them the proper "respect" could (and often do) impose their racism on others.

8 posted on 09/28/2010 5:54:02 AM PDT by TruthShallSetYouFree (If not for the double standard, liberals would have no standards at all.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: MrB

Behold the Communist Lie.


9 posted on 09/28/2010 5:54:25 AM PDT by screaminsunshine (counter revolutionary)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: libstripper

All Obama has ever wanted is to switch places with his “oppressors.”


10 posted on 09/28/2010 5:54:35 AM PDT by subterfuge (BUILD MORE NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS NOW!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TruthShallSetYouFree

That was always my answer as well -

whenever a black decides to use violence on someone of another “race” because the victim not black is IMPOSING HIS RACISM, and proving that he has the power to do so.


11 posted on 09/28/2010 5:56:49 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a (de)humanist and a Satanist is that the latter knows who he's working for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: libstripper

BTTT


12 posted on 09/28/2010 6:01:12 AM PDT by SharpRightTurn (White, black, and red all over--America's affirmative action, metrosexual president.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SharpRightTurn
in January 2011, I wonder if Eric Holder will be at Justice Department? Hearings under a GOP congress will be interesting.
13 posted on 09/28/2010 6:18:42 AM PDT by scooby321
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: libstripper

Time for a Special Prosecutor, but I won’t hold my breath till that happens. DOJ is doing exactly what the White House wants, and unless the Republicans control the House and at least 2/3rds of the Senate, there is little chance of having this investigated properly. That doesn’t mean abandon it, it means we may not get back to resolving this at least until Eric Holder is gone.

This is some very nasty business, and the longer it festers, the worse it will get. Nothing could embolden the NBP better than this kind of overt political support directly out of the White House...(who would ever believe we would actually read a sentence like that??!!).


14 posted on 09/28/2010 6:20:25 AM PDT by Bean Counter (Now what kind of a geroo are you anyway?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TruthShallSetYouFree
“they don’t have the power to impose their racism on others”.

I've always cringed at that quote. It's total bullcrap. Two blacks strolling down the street who decide that a lone white walking past them has not shown them the proper "respect" could (and often do) impose their racism on others.

Two black gents much larger than me tossing me around a front lawn 39 years ago perhaps because I was the last white at a party - they had significant power over me at the time.

Scowling guys with billy clubs have power over those they intimidate.

The power argument is convenient and specious.

15 posted on 09/28/2010 6:32:45 AM PDT by jimfree (In 2012 Sarah Palin will continue to have more relevant quality executive experience than B. Obama.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: scooby321

“in January 2011, I wonder if Eric Holder will be at Justice Department? Hearings under a GOP congress will be interesting.”

Interesting question.

I don’t think the regular party boys would have the guts to take the Obummer Injustice Dept. on. However, I think that with a lot of the fresh blood that will be elected, who will not yet be corrupted, there should be a lot of heat placed on the Dept. of Injustice in general and Holder in particular. When it gets to the point where it is costing Zero too much political capital, he’ll likely make Holder walk the plank.


16 posted on 09/28/2010 6:32:57 AM PDT by SharpRightTurn (White, black, and red all over--America's affirmative action, metrosexual president.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Truth29
Obstruction of Justice...All the more reason to impeach and remove.
17 posted on 09/28/2010 6:54:22 AM PDT by hoosiermama (ONLY DEAD FISH GO WITH THE FLOW.......I am swimming with Sarahcudah! Sarah has read the tealeaves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: libstripper

Justice? in this Justice Department is a joke.


18 posted on 09/28/2010 7:22:50 AM PDT by ExTexasRedhead (Take back our country on November 2, 2010. Let's Roll!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bitt

Thanks for the ping!


19 posted on 09/28/2010 8:33:39 AM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: libstripper
He's been racist as long as he can remember.


20 posted on 09/28/2010 10:00:47 AM PDT by Lady Jag (Double your income... Fire the government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bitt

Thanks for the ping. See post above.


21 posted on 09/28/2010 10:02:30 AM PDT by Lady Jag (Double your income... Fire the government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: bitt

Yet another good reason the current socialist must be removed from power. I wonder when Holder will indicate he wants to move on before the heat starts to really rise.


22 posted on 09/28/2010 4:35:02 PM PDT by Marine_Uncle (Honor must be earned....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: bitt; AdmSmith; Arthur Wildfire! March; Berosus; bigheadfred; blueyon; Convert from ECUSA; ...

An drew McCarthy writing in Natiunal Review Online

:’)

Thanks bitt.


23 posted on 09/28/2010 7:42:11 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (The 2nd Amendment follows right behind the 1st because some people are hard of hearing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

Never drink and post, OP. :-)


24 posted on 09/29/2010 5:11:20 AM PDT by TheOldLady (Pablo is very wily.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: TheOldLady

;’)


25 posted on 09/29/2010 7:55:17 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (Democratic Underground... matters are worse, as their latest fund drive has come up short...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson