Posted on 09/29/2010 1:23:22 AM PDT by Jim Robinson
Earlier today she sent a copyright complaint. Then whined when I put her URL on the no post list. Now she's threatening some kind of legal action if I don't pull all of a certain poster's posts about her "in one hour!" Whiney little green-eyed beotch sure can sling the hash against Sarah and others, but apparently can't take it if someone slings a little back. As far as I know, it's not illegal to criticize members of the press (or of the wannabe political hack class).
Can we post that we read her drivel and think she is insane?
Her latest demand:
“Sounds like you are the one who can’t take it, given your very defensive and angry response. Jim, thanks for the obscenities. Real classy. You can’t respond with any legit answer to you attack me and use four-letter words. I can take the heat just fine. And I really don’t want or need an account at FR. What I want—and consider this a demand letter, since I’ve now put you on notice and you’ve acknowledged receipt by already responding—is for you to remove all comments by bwc2221 claiming that I wrote that the Michigan/Ohio serial killer was a Muslim. He’s made the allegation several times. It’s false. It’s illegal, and you have an hour to take all of his comments making that allegation about me down. Please do so and let me know you’ve complied.”
That was in response to my earlier reply to her:
You sure whine a lot for someone who likes to sling the sh!t. Can’t stand the heat, stay out of the kitchen.
One thing for sure.
More people are going to read bwc’s posts now than if she had never said anything.
I read a few paragraphs of her crap today where she was slandering the Palins as frauds, and freepers in general as nutcases and idiots, etc. Don’t think I need to read much more of her bile to get the general idea of where she’s coming from. She would fit in nicely on the View.
Perhaps it's the late hour but something here just doesn't read right. But then I admit to being old.
I can’t keep all those minor Z-List celebrity blonde lawyer talking heads straight. Which one is she and why do we even care?
Emperor Misha I was most astute when he dubbed her “T*ts on a Chair”.
Well she was attacking Sean Hannity as a thief a few months ago, so you are in good company.
I think that “to” should have been “so”
Seems there are many chameleons changing their colors in this election season...perhaps we are finally getting a glimpse of their ‘true’ colors.
Did she call you an anti-Semite? Surely that’s coming soon, if it hasn’t already.
Yep. Bummer, huh.
:)
Very clever... ; ~ )..... on that funny note I’m off to the land of Nod....
Love your comment.
It was just a minor four letter word (I don’t think one of the deadly seven). And my message was sent in good humor, not anger.
Well, you know what they say, freep ‘em if they can’t take a joke.
Good riddance.
She’s a poser.
Oh. Do I ever. Heh. ;)
Are you satisfied now? JR and FR probably wasted valuable time cleaning up your mess. If what she claimed is true, then you were purposefully lying, which gives this whole site a bad name. Way to go sparky, thanks for whacking away at our information flow just because some idiot blogger won’t give you the time of day and your feelings got hurt.
It appears that I was right.
Who on earth is Debbie Schlussel?
When she went thru the change, the chemicals really altered her outlook on life. Years ago I had her site bookmarked then suddenly it went all dark as in hate filled.
Sad, so very sad to see someone consumed with such hate.
Speaking of that, have you seen Kathleen Parker recently?
With a face like that she should leave the feed bag on.
Debbie's talent as a seer is vastly overated, too. She claimed that Pam Geller was just causing trouble for the person Pam supported, Rifqa Bary. Debbie claimed that Rifqa Bary would be deported after she became 18. Instead, Rifqa Bary was granted asylum.
Also, Debbie claimed that Jessica Seinfeld (the comedian's wife) plagiarized her book. What Debbie Schlussel doesn't mention is that Jessica Seinfeld was not convicted in the civil case suing her for plagiarism. I looked through Debbie's site for some retraction of what she said of Jessica Seinfeld or even a mention of the failure of the civil suit against her. Alas, I could not find anything.
Did you forget the /sar tag?
Why are you slinging mud at bwc2221? Unless Jim removed some posts of his (which I doubt), I don’t see anything recent of his that would get her bleached blond hair in a bundle. In fact, I like his well-thought out comments. Check them out yourself.
http://www.freerepublic.com/tag/by:bwc2221/index?tab=comments;brevity=full;options=no-change
While on this riff, can we ban Erik Erickson and redstate.com preemptively?
Debbie Schlussel ... hah... I stopped posting on threads where she was the author cause the few freepers who follow her are about as fragile as she is when under civil but public scrutiny.
I ask also we post photos of Pam Geller in every future mention of Debbie Schlussel. For good measure.
I’m not totally convinced that
she’d
FIT on the View . . .
unless they’ve installed a double garage door
to allow her head to make it into the room.
Oh,
I guess that wasn’t
“bits on a high horse”
after all.
“More people are going to read bwc’s posts now than if she had never said anything.”
Be there in about 3 minutes!
guffaws.
Looks like she was bit in the ego by
the
Queen of the Black Widow Spider Women
Some creatures seem to make
hypocrisy
a major hobby if not an avocation.
No problem, Jim. I don’t read her columns, but I know she caused quite a stir when she set her sights on Sean Hannity.
Earlier today she sent a copyright complaint. Then whined when I put her URL on the no post list.
___________________________________________________________
So what does she want if she is making copyright complaints but wants us to post her stuff?
Poor little debbie sitting in a tree
Whining that conservatives are after me
Fair use exerpts and linking to external websites doesn’t constitute copyright infringement by any stretch, even if it’s only to illustrate what a lunatic she is. Her threats are empty, but the ultimate decision is yours Jim and will be respected.
She’s splitting hairs. Title of one of her columns:
Serial Killer Who Targeted US Blacks is Palestinian Arab Alien (Expired Pasport), Police Hid “Mid-Eastern” Description
So . . . she’s wigging out about someone jumping to a conclusion she did nothing to dispel. She sure didn’t say he’s not a muslim in the piece I just read. Leaves it hanging there . . . In fact she wrote: “It is well known that Palestinians, Arabs, and the Arab and Muslim worlds are racist. As I’ve noted before, they call Blacks, “abed” or “abeed”–singular and plural for slave, in Arabic.”
To me the latter implies he is Muslim, otherwise why is she bringing it up?
I googled her to see who she was.
Not a very popular per.
No great loss. This was a good idea before you had a policy.
Having read that piece also I'd have to say she leads the reader to that conclusion.
You just insulted that poor little dog. :)
Email: writedebbie@gmail.com
To All Federal Agents and Other Sources Who Wish to Remain Confidential: No-one reads or has access to Debbie’s mail, except Debbie. If you would like anonymity/confidentiality, please say so (though in the case of federal agents, Debbie considers the identity of the e-mailer confidential, unless the e-mailer permits otherwise). The exceptions here are hate-mailers and Abu Moskowitz–everything they say, write, etc. is fair game).
To All Hate-mailers: Thank you for spending valuable seconds, minutes, etc. of your life on Debbie. She appreciates your obsession, but rest assured it is, very likely, not mutual.
guffaws.
It’s a damn shame when somebody who should be our ally self-destructs like that. So be it; my loyalties are here.
Meh!
That dog is insane and she deserved it. :-P
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.