Skip to comments.Royal Society issues new climate change guide admits there are 'uncertainties' about the science
Posted on 09/30/2010 7:08:48 AM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer
The UKs leading scientific body has been forced to rewrite its guide on climate change and admit that it is not known how much warmer the Earth will become.
The Royal Society has updated its guide after 43 of its members complained that the previous version failed to take into account the opinion of climate change sceptics. Now the new guide, called Climate change: a summary of the science, admits that there are some uncertainties regarding the science behind climate change.
And it says that it impossible to know for sure how the Earth's climate will change in the future nor what the possible effects may be.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...
The only “uncertainty” is whether it is bullsh*t or horsesh*t.
But it is possible to know how this admission of doubt will affect dimcrats...they will ignore it, move forward on their pretext of catastrophe, and try their damnest pass cap’n’tax as a lame-duck congress.
They’ve never let the facts control the issues so why start now?
In truth, peer reviewed literature and research itself is now admittedly based on falsehoods. Precedents of hard science now refer to false conclusions and a history of incorrect proofs and ‘scholarly work.’
Any related ‘Science’ is now dead.
We know precisely how many extra polar bears will die if we don't impose cap and trade. In fact, we know how many polar bears die for each SUV mile driven and how many baby seals drown for each degree we set our heat above 60 in the winter.
Starting today, the Washington Examiner is running a special report on Big Green: the alliance of progressive activists, environmental groups like the Sierra Club, and the Democratic Party that has become perhaps the most powerful single lobby in Washington today.
How the Environmental Movement Became Just Another Washington Power Bloc
Its not just a band of flannel-shirted environmentalists any longer; its become a big-money, major player in Washington power politics and American elections.
September 27, 2010 - by Charlie Martin [snip] Continue reading at above link
I would`nt get too excited about this. They will be pressured into making a retraction or a “clarification.”