Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Shame on Family Films?
Patriot Post ^ | October 1, 2010 | L. Brent Bozell

Posted on 10/01/2010 8:49:58 AM PDT by rhema

Don't read Newsweek magazine while drinking a beverage. A spit take is the obvious first reaction to a column by Julia Baird headlined "The Shame of Family Films." On the Internet, this article is coded as "Why Family Films Are So Sexist."

Baird's denunciation of Hollywood's fraction of decent entertainment began: "They have all been smash hits: 'Finding Nemo,' 'Madagascar,' 'Ice Age,' 'Toy Story.' Fish, penguins, rats, stuffed animals, talking toys. All good innocent family fun, right? Sure, except there are few female characters in those films. There are certainly few doing anything meaningful or heroic -- and no, Bo Peep doesn't count."

So what does feminist bean-counting have to do with whether a movie is "good innocent family fun"? Did any young girl come away from "Finding Nemo" feeling like the memory-challenged Ellen DeGeneres fish character didn't represent female empowerment effectively? Were they offended by the oppressively archaic stereotype of Jessie the Yodeling Cowgirl during "Toy Story 2"? Families can't enjoy these films without expecting them to pass some politically correct quota exam?

The Newsweek columnist was promoting a new study from Stacy Smith and Marc Choueiti of the Annenberg School for Communications and Journalism at the University of Southern California. They reportedly analyzed 122 family films (rated G, PG and PG-13), including 50 top-grossing ones, between 2006 and 2009. She found it "startling" that there is "only one female character to every three male characters in family movies." (Well, not exactly -- they claim 29.2 percent of characters were female.)

Worse than that, Baird the Angry Feminist protested, "The female characters were also more likely than men to be beautiful." Well, that's scandalously unfair! (Don't think Baird wouldn't also protest if a certain number of women were ugly beyond repair.)

There's more. One in five female characters were "portrayed with some exposed skin between the mid-chest and upper thigh regions." If a conservative tried to suggest "The Little Mermaid" should put on a shirt, tell me Newsweek wouldn't point fingers and laugh. But that's what Newsweek's Angry Feminist is suggesting.

Baird was especially upset that cartoons might exaggerate the female physique: "One in four women was shown with a waist so small that, the authors concluded, it left 'little room for a womb or any other internal organs.' Maybe we could carry them in our purses?" Baird even claimed "another study" found "women in G-rated films wear the same amount of skimpy clothing as women in R-rated films."

That just sounds ludicrous. Anyone wanting to check on Baird's academic assertions would have trouble, since these two studies she's referring to cannot be found on the Annenberg School website or anywhere else online. The Annenberg study was commissioned by the Geena Davis Institute on Gender in Media, which has been compiling data on women in film. Davis, the actress who most recently played the president on ABC, told Newsweek that 17 percent of animators are female, and women form 17 percent of crowd scenes in family films. Only 17 percent of narrators are female.

Ridiculous -- and funny, too. How nit-pickingly intricate are these studies to count genders in "crowd scenes"? WHO CARES? As for only 17 percent of females being narrators, does Davis find it distasteful if her husband reads a bedtime story?

But Davis isn't done with her feminist footnotes. She also claims research shows that the more TV a girl watches, the fewer options she believes she has in life, and the more a boy watches, the more his views become sexist. A look at the Geena Davis Institute website shows that her group is marshaling feminist research attacking on all of these fronts -- the dearth of female characters, animators, directors and so on -- with the entire panoply of TV and movies, not just the family films.

There's nothing wrong with seeking more female directors, producers or major characters in Hollywood -- they're supposed to be feminist enough to have already imposed "affirmative action." But for Newsweek to single out family films as somehow shameful is beyond unfair -- especially since none of them are truly singled out. Tell us how "Finding Nemo" or "Toy Story" are the work of sexist pigs.

Baird isn't just an Angry Feminist; she's a hypocrite, too. Last year, her own magazine tried to embarrass Sarah Palin by putting an old photo of her on the cover in running shorts, suggesting this Caribou Barbie wasn't ready for prime time. Did Baird protest? No, she defended the cover since Palin "has been photographed and filmed more than once in aerobic gear."

Newsweek, heal thyself.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS: academicbias; anotherstudy; antibreeder; beancounting; culturewar; doublestandard; feminazi; feminism; geenadavis; heterophobia; hypocrite; identitypolitics; juliabaird; media; newsweak; newsweek; pravdamedia
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-58 next last

1 posted on 10/01/2010 8:50:03 AM PDT by rhema
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Caleb1411
Julia Baird harrumphs, "Has she no shame?"


2 posted on 10/01/2010 8:52:22 AM PDT by rhema ("Break the conventions; keep the commandments." -- G. K. Chesterton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rhema

Oh for heaven’s sake. How silly to worry about the number of female characters in a cartoon.


3 posted on 10/01/2010 8:52:52 AM PDT by MEGoody (Ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rhema
One in five female characters were "portrayed with some exposed skin between the mid-chest and upper thigh regions."

Heck, that's nothing: The female fish "Dori" in the movie Finding Nemo was COMPLETELY NAKED throughout the entire film! How outrageous is THAT?

4 posted on 10/01/2010 8:53:35 AM PDT by WayneS (Respect the 2nd Amendment; Repeal the 16th)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


5 posted on 10/01/2010 8:54:08 AM PDT by rhema ("Break the conventions; keep the commandments." -- G. K. Chesterton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rhema
Baird was especially upset that cartoons might exaggerate the female physique: "One in four women was shown with a waist so small that, the authors concluded, it left 'little room for a womb or any other internal organs.' Maybe we could carry them in our purses?"

Strange. I had this Baird woman pegged as someone who would support a woman's right do whatever she wanted to with her womb, INCLUDING having it removed and carrying it around in a pocket. Maybe she's not as big a proponent of women's rights as she thinks she is...

;-)

6 posted on 10/01/2010 8:58:17 AM PDT by WayneS (Respect the 2nd Amendment; Repeal the 16th)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rhema

women form 17 percent of crowd scenes in family films.

What a dunce. It is so obvious even I can see the reason.

You can’t go running off to every crowd scene when you are barefoot and pregnant, now can you. Sheeeesh.


7 posted on 10/01/2010 9:01:20 AM PDT by wita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rhema

“...the Geena Davis Institute on Gender in Media”

Seriously??


8 posted on 10/01/2010 9:01:23 AM PDT by Hacklehead (Note to Leftists- We Will Bury You (politically)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rhema

Liberalism is a mental disease.


9 posted on 10/01/2010 9:02:01 AM PDT by reagan_fanatic (Obama, Pelosi and Reid - the Trio of Twits)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rhema
There's more. One in five female characters were "portrayed with some exposed skin between the mid-chest and upper thigh regions."

I found one of our heroines who seems to be completely unclothed. Hubba hubba.

10 posted on 10/01/2010 9:08:08 AM PDT by GreenAccord (Bakon Akbar!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rhema

Grievance-mongers such as Baird are, uniformly: terribly unhappy people who seek to validate their misery by tearing at the joy of others.


11 posted on 10/01/2010 9:08:56 AM PDT by andy58-in-nh (America does not need to be organized: it needs to be liberated.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rhema

“There’s nothing wrong with seeking more female directors, producers or major characters in Hollywood — they’re supposed to be feminist enough to have already imposed “affirmative action.”

I don’t know about the movie business but of you watch commercials you would think that white males make up about 10% of the US population, and that 50% of those are hen-pecked, morons, or both.


12 posted on 10/01/2010 9:09:09 AM PDT by Hacklehead (Note to Leftists- We Will Bury You (politically)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rhema

Without looking, I will say I am sure she is a hideous looking beast striking back at the world for not getting asked to the prom.


13 posted on 10/01/2010 9:11:03 AM PDT by Personal Responsibility ("In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act" - Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rhema

So a woman who found fame for her looks starts an institute that funds women to do studies showing cartoons tend to have good looking female characters...anyone else think that seems silly?

Or is it that since Davis has porked out, she wants company with fat cartoon characters?


14 posted on 10/01/2010 9:11:53 AM PDT by Mr Rogers (When the ass brays, don't reply...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rhema
Hottest cartoon character...


15 posted on 10/01/2010 9:12:28 AM PDT by socal_parrot (I hate to say I told you so, but...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Personal Responsibility
Surprisingly wrong...


16 posted on 10/01/2010 9:15:35 AM PDT by socal_parrot (I hate to say I told you so, but...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: rhema

You know if Palin looked like Helen Thomas, they still would act ugly... but since she is HOT...:) I feel much better about her populist and conservative views!!


17 posted on 10/01/2010 9:18:46 AM PDT by Nat Turner (I can see NOVEMBER from my house....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: rhema

“The Incredibles” had a great example of a Mom and Wife. Maybe that wasn’t on her Netflix list.


18 posted on 10/01/2010 9:23:14 AM PDT by Anitius Severinus Boethius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GreenAccord

The robot in Wall-E and the fish in Finding Nemo were naked for the entire film. It’s like they’re showing porn to kids.

Wait, I bet NEWSWEEK would be all for doing that in school.


19 posted on 10/01/2010 9:26:46 AM PDT by GeronL (http://libertyfic.proboards.com <--- My Fiction/ Science Fiction Board)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: socal_parrot

Interesting. I wonder...if she pricks her skin do you think she bleeds blood, oil or venom?


20 posted on 10/01/2010 9:27:23 AM PDT by Personal Responsibility ("In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act" - Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: rhema

This is why Newseak - the entire business - is worth less than a dollar.

No one cares what inane stuff their leftists post.

Although the last few sentences should have been first - Newseak was so worried about sexualizing women that they put Palin on their cover in her running gear.

Joke.


21 posted on 10/01/2010 9:27:54 AM PDT by Eldon Tyrell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hacklehead

http://www.thegeenadavisinstitute.org/


22 posted on 10/01/2010 9:32:32 AM PDT by LibFreeOrDie (Obama promised a gold mine, but will give us the shaft.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

People really need to get over themselves. Good looks are just that.
23 posted on 10/01/2010 9:43:07 AM PDT by combat_boots (The Lion of Judah cometh. Hallelujah. Gloria Patri, Filio et Spiritui Sancto.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: rhema
Worse than that, Baird the Angry Feminist protested, "The female characters were also more likely than men to be beautiful."

And how many of those "ugly men" were portraying the villain or some idiot comedic supporting role?

24 posted on 10/01/2010 9:54:49 AM PDT by a fool in paradise (Ask yourself,where does Saudi Arabia fit on a scale of "passive" to "moderate" to "extremist" Islam?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rhema

This is BS.

Even if this is true in terms of stats, regular films more than make up for it.

I am so tired of seeing tiny non-muscular women flipping huge guys or knocking them out with one punch. That is not reality. We are flooded with this kind of crap. All the tv and movies in other categories have the guys being stupid, always needing women’s help to do anything. It’s just crazy.


25 posted on 10/01/2010 9:58:03 AM PDT by Secret Agent Man (I'd like to tell you, but then I'd have to kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rhema; Revolting cat!; The Comedian
Baird was especially upset that cartoons might exaggerate the female physique: "One in four women was shown with a waist so small that, the authors concluded, it left 'little room for a womb or any other internal organs.'


26 posted on 10/01/2010 9:58:15 AM PDT by a fool in paradise (Ask yourself,where does Saudi Arabia fit on a scale of "passive" to "moderate" to "extremist" Islam?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibFreeOrDie

The “Gee, Nada Vis Institute?”


27 posted on 10/01/2010 9:59:09 AM PDT by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
Baird even claimed "another study" found "women in G-rated films wear the same amount of skimpy clothing as women in R-rated films."

Pravda Media + Academic Bias BUMP

28 posted on 10/01/2010 10:00:23 AM PDT by a fool in paradise (Ask yourself,where does Saudi Arabia fit on a scale of "passive" to "moderate" to "extremist" Islam?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rhema

Man there has to be something in a name. Every “Julia” I’ve ever met has been a liberal feminist. Actively looking at things in society people like and pointing out how they believe women are getting screwed over.


29 posted on 10/01/2010 10:01:55 AM PDT by Secret Agent Man (I'd like to tell you, but then I'd have to kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hacklehead
I don’t know about the movie business but of you watch commercials you would think that white males make up about 10% of the US population, and that 50% of those are hen-pecked, morons, or both.

And the 50% who aren't henpecked morons are masked robbers breaking into some woman's house on a home alarm commercial.

30 posted on 10/01/2010 10:03:59 AM PDT by Nea Wood (Silly liberal . . . paychecks are for workers!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: socal_parrot
Jessica Rabbit would also rate very high on Julia Baird's Harrumph Meter.


31 posted on 10/01/2010 10:05:52 AM PDT by rhema ("Break the conventions; keep the commandments." -- G. K. Chesterton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: rhema; JoeProBono
...the more (tv) a boy watches, the more his views become sexist...

Or metrosexist

32 posted on 10/01/2010 10:07:47 AM PDT by a fool in paradise (Ask yourself,where does Saudi Arabia fit on a scale of "passive" to "moderate" to "extremist" Islam?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rhema

My only problem with these animated films, is they offer a home to the actors and actresses who by virtue of their liberal beliefs, have lost the ability to draw revenue.

They turn off folks when on film, so they hide them away in these animated films as voices.


33 posted on 10/01/2010 10:09:30 AM PDT by esoxmagnum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rhema
They reportedly analyzed 122 family films (rated G, PG and PG-13), including 50 top-grossing ones, between 2006 and 2009. She found it "startling" that there is "only one female character to every three male characters in family movies."

I can tell you with good authority that this is a very conscious decision from the studios for the simple reason that experience has borne out time and time again that boys won't go see a girl movie, but girls will go see a boy movie. Look at the current marketing for Disney's "Tangled." It's the Rapunzel story, but they're desperately trying to make it look like it's a boy movie.

34 posted on 10/01/2010 10:11:21 AM PDT by Bubba Ho-Tep ("More weight!"--Giles Corey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rhema

I am a big fan of Palin and Bachmann (both seriously hot), but I don’t think either has yet eclipsed the conservative accomplishments of Thatcher and Schlafly (not as hot.) Lefties hate conservative women based on their good looks. Conservatives love conservative women based on their principles and accomplishments.


35 posted on 10/01/2010 10:16:15 AM PDT by Onelifetogive (I tweet, too...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: rhema; Timesink; martin_fierro; reformed_democrat; Loyalist; =Intervention=; PianoMan; GOPJ; ...
Baird isn't just an Angry Feminist; she's a hypocrite, too. Last year, her own magazine tried to embarrass Sarah Palin by putting an old photo of her on the cover in running shorts, suggesting this Caribou Barbie wasn't ready for prime time. Did Baird protest? No, she defended the cover since Palin "has been photographed and filmed more than once in aerobic gear."

Use these for all future Newsweak cover photos of our man-child prezzydent.


36 posted on 10/01/2010 10:22:34 AM PDT by a fool in paradise (Ask yourself,where does Saudi Arabia fit on a scale of "passive" to "moderate" to "extremist" Islam?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: esoxmagnum

Many (but not all) celebrity voiced cartoon features are crap. Time was that voice actors were hired because they had the skills to portray a number of characters just with their voices.

Scale is still being hired to do up to three different voices for a work and only drawing one pay.

Celebrities generally don’t offer numerous voices, or even put that much into their readings of the characters.


37 posted on 10/01/2010 10:26:27 AM PDT by a fool in paradise (Ask yourself,where does Saudi Arabia fit on a scale of "passive" to "moderate" to "extremist" Islam?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: rhema
The female characters were also more likely than men to be beautiful

I should hope so

38 posted on 10/01/2010 10:29:07 AM PDT by fml
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: socal_parrot
Bit more contemporary "real life" photo:


39 posted on 10/01/2010 10:30:24 AM PDT by a fool in paradise (Ask yourself,where does Saudi Arabia fit on a scale of "passive" to "moderate" to "extremist" Islam?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Anitius Severinus Boethius

What makes you think she sees anything positive in mothers and wives or nuclear families?


40 posted on 10/01/2010 10:32:52 AM PDT by a fool in paradise (Ask yourself,where does Saudi Arabia fit on a scale of "passive" to "moderate" to "extremist" Islam?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: rhema

Reminds me of the article about ten years ago when some woman complained about Disney characters’ cup sizes.


41 posted on 10/01/2010 10:33:29 AM PDT by HungarianGypsy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: socal_parrot
Esmeralda from The Hunchback of Notre Dame has to be the hottest Disney character ever


42 posted on 10/01/2010 10:35:23 AM PDT by dfwgator (Texas Rangers - AL West Champions)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: rhema

I want Betty Boop back before the censors took her Boop-boop-be-doop away!


43 posted on 10/01/2010 10:35:23 AM PDT by Ruy Dias de Bivar ( AKA Rodrigo de Bivar)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HungarianGypsy
Reminds me of the article about ten years ago when some woman complained about Disney characters’ cup sizes.

Seriously?


44 posted on 10/01/2010 10:36:04 AM PDT by a fool in paradise (Ask yourself,where does Saudi Arabia fit on a scale of "passive" to "moderate" to "extremist" Islam?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Ruy Dias de Bivar

45 posted on 10/01/2010 10:37:22 AM PDT by a fool in paradise (Ask yourself,where does Saudi Arabia fit on a scale of "passive" to "moderate" to "extremist" Islam?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: a fool in paradise
"The female characters were also more likely than men to be beautiful."

I wonder if she has discovered the Ru-Paul Drag U program.

She should stay home and watch that rather than go out an make a public nuisance of herself.

46 posted on 10/01/2010 10:42:21 AM PDT by oyez (The difference in genius and stupidity is that genius has limits.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: rhema

Jessica should never be faulted for her appearance. She was drawn that way.


47 posted on 10/01/2010 10:45:50 AM PDT by oyez (The difference in genius and stupidity is that genius has limits.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: rhema

“Sure, except there are few female characters in those films. There are certainly few doing anything meaningful or heroic — and no, Bo... “

She obviously didn’t see “Finding Nemo”, nor did she acknowledge that the “female” supporting character in that movie “stole the show” a number of times during the script, and portrayed a certain “heroic” sense to the character in spite of not being the “lead” character (Nemo).


48 posted on 10/01/2010 10:47:51 AM PDT by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rhema

The owner of Newsweek is Jane Harmon’s husband.

He bought it for $1 about 2 months ago.


49 posted on 10/01/2010 10:50:31 AM PDT by ridesthemiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bubba Ho-Tep
. . . boys won't go see a girl movie, but girls will go see a boy movie.

Exactly right. My girls could consistently beat me at the rather bloody video game Doom. I'm sure libtards would be appalled by all that violence, but the girls saw it as a video game challenge, nothing more.

All three grew up to be fine young ladies and not one of them grew up to be a bed wetting liberal.

50 posted on 10/01/2010 11:00:22 AM PDT by Vigilanteman (Obama: Fake black man. Fake Messiah. Fake American. How many fakes can you fit in one Zer0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-58 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson