Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: K-oneTexas

Stupid. It’s the fault of the damned priest and nobody else. And unless im wrong, isn’t the pope only the head of the American Catholic church in a religious sense? In the corporate structurre, he isn’t technically the “CEO” of every personnel and financial decision made by the American church, is he? Anyone know?


7 posted on 10/01/2010 3:33:18 PM PDT by DesertRhino (I was standing with a rifle, waiting for soviet paratroopers, but communists just ran for office)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: DesertRhino

That’s not correct. Bishops might be called the “CEOs” of their dioceses. Archbishops with archdioceses.


11 posted on 10/01/2010 3:45:42 PM PDT by malkee (Actually I'm an ex-smoker--more than four years now-- But I think about it every day.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: DesertRhino
The pope has absolutely zilch to do with personnel decisions in American dioceses.

This is the fault of (1) the priest; (2) his bishop, the notorious Rembert Weakland, now retired, who FINALLY admitted to being a homosexual after using church funds to pay off a homosexual lover to the tune of $450,000. He didn't want to turn in his fellow fruitcake the priest, so he waited for 20-odd years to notify the Vatican that anything was going on.

The idea that this is somehow the Pope's fault is insane.

12 posted on 10/01/2010 3:51:13 PM PDT by AnAmericanMother (Ministrix of ye Chasse, TTGC Ladies' Auxiliary (recess appointment))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: DesertRhino

If memory serves the Bishops of the Dioceses in America have been held responsible for acts of priests in the USA ... never the Pope or the Vatican. As a sovereign nation, a nation-state, the Vatican can (and I guess will) claim immunity from prosecution as an entity and for the Pope and Cardinals residing in Rome.

They may be guilty of protecting the priests however as a nation-state I think immune from civil and criminal courts. Its diplomatic immunity much like other nations and the UN enjoys.

They are as sovereign as the United States and its President ... unless the World Court/International Criminal Court is given jurisdiction by the US Senate approving the treaty. If that happened, any diplomatic immunity held by the US or other member nations would be swept aside and this court could arrest and try any nations citizens. As they have tries with former President Bush and former SECDEF Rumsfeld for war crimes.

Bad precedent to be setting in my opinion should the Dem/Lib/RINO controlled Senate ratify this Clinton made treaty.


18 posted on 10/01/2010 8:55:01 PM PDT by K-oneTexas (I'm not a judge and there ain't enough of me to be a jury. (Zell Miller, A National Party No More))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson