Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

140th Anniversary of Robert E. Lee's death
Huntington News ^ | October 1, 2010 | Calvin E. Johnson, Jr.

Posted on 10/01/2010 4:15:03 PM PDT by BigReb555

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121-126 next last
To: Michael.SF.
What rubbish. Please check what Lee's army did in Maryland and Southern Pennsylvania long before Sherman's March to the Sea -- Depredations which the "noble" Bobby Lee casually dismissed as acceptable practice. As for your speculation, Grant whipped Lee's ass. That's the verdict of History, and your lame assertion is contrary to the facts. Lee had all the tactical advantages that accrue to the defense. In offensive operations he was a pitiful general. Even Longstreet admitted it.
61 posted on 10/01/2010 5:54:09 PM PDT by FredZarguna ("I say we take off and nuke the entire site from orbit. It's the only way to be sure.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: omegadawn
He was hanged for misuse of government property( thumped up charges). He was hanged and buried in full military uniform.

Benedict Arnold died in London in 1801 of natural causes.

Jack

62 posted on 10/01/2010 5:57:04 PM PDT by JackOfVA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: FredZarguna
unfortunately we've allowed too many Southerners to write our subsequent history.

If that's the case, then why is Lincoln so revered?

63 posted on 10/01/2010 5:57:26 PM PDT by Fast Moving Angel (We'll remember in November!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: FredZarguna

General Lee had good lieutenants. He botched things when he did not listen to them.

His greatest sin was he knew that he had lost when Grant trapped him in the trenches around Petersberg. He knew the war was lost and yet thousands more died because he would not stop the war. Their blood is on his hands.


64 posted on 10/01/2010 5:59:20 PM PDT by american_ranger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: BigReb555

The Civil War in Four minutes - VIDIO

http://maniacworld.com/civil-war-in-four-minutes.html


65 posted on 10/01/2010 6:02:49 PM PDT by NavyCanDo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BigReb555

Just visited his old house in Arlington National Cemetary this past weekend. Nice old place. I’m glad he wised up and did the right thing for the Country after the war.


66 posted on 10/01/2010 6:03:12 PM PDT by vpintheak (Love of God, Family and Country has made me an extremist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FredZarguna
Lee is highly overrated.

I don't think Lee was overrated. I do think that, after Shiloh (death of Albert S. Johnston), Lee was a s good as any and better than most.

The strategic vision in every defensive struggle has to be survival...period. He didn't have the resources to do otherwise.

I also think Longstreet was as good as they get. He proved it in the Wilderness and in other places.

Lee erred greatly at Gettysburg but still nearly won.

Big men make big mistakes.

67 posted on 10/01/2010 6:03:59 PM PDT by stevem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Danae

3 grown kids and 2 grand kids here...
My point being ... ‘ya got good genes!
Raise them young-uns right!


68 posted on 10/01/2010 6:05:10 PM PDT by Repeal The 17th
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: BigReb555

I’m no civil war expert, but it seems to me it was the Navy that won the war, not the Army. The northern Navy’s blockade of the south had more to do with the eventual outcome than anything else.

Hard to fight a barefoot army, no matter how good Lee and the Army of Northern Virginia. The south didn’t have much of a Navy, a few raiders, and various and sundry other small vessels, and that was it. I don’t know how the south thought they could win without at least as good a Navy as their Army.


69 posted on 10/01/2010 6:08:07 PM PDT by sasportas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BigReb555

Have read 50-some posts here, good points on both sides.
Different world 150 years ago so I contend most of us don’t quite understand the love of one’s home state felt during that era.
I’m not sure how I feel about Lee. As a strong believer in States’ rights, I see his side. Since he went to West Point, served our country, and took an oath to uphold our Constitution and defend our Nation, I see the side of those who consider him a traitor.
Ultimately, he’s a traitor because he lost.
FWIW, if I had been alive back then, I’d probably have fought with the South.


70 posted on 10/01/2010 6:09:26 PM PDT by Holen1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FredZarguna
Grant was also a much better President than history has remembered

My son has been a studier of administrations. He told me more than once that Grant would have come down at least average or better if he hadn't had a second term.

He also had difficulty judging men when they were not in uniform. That puts him in a big club...with such as Benjamin Franklin.

71 posted on 10/01/2010 6:09:37 PM PDT by stevem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: stevem

That’s what I recall of the story too. Ultimately the US government was forced to pay for it after the USSC ruled that they had taken it illegally.


72 posted on 10/01/2010 6:11:25 PM PDT by Reaganwuzthebest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Michael.SF.

many in england even in the 18c supported the american revolution,it was not clear cut as its presented today.


73 posted on 10/01/2010 6:25:57 PM PDT by removed107 (supported)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: FredZarguna
Would you please reference the “depredations” committed in Maryland and Penn.Sources please. The Confederates viewed Maryland as another southern state. Why injure a friend? I have studied this era off and on for over 40 years and am not aware of any systematic attempt to despoil and destroy the economy of a region such as Sherman's March to the sea. Grant's defeat of Lee is a fact. You betray a lack of understanding in referring to it as a “verdict of history”. I suggest you read some books on the Civil War and Robert E. Lee in particular. I am trying with all my might to be civil. I am not sure if you are amazingly uninformed or just trying to pick a fight.
74 posted on 10/01/2010 6:26:09 PM PDT by prof.h.mandingo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: JackOfVA

I guess the old saying is true , don’t beleive everything you read. I was reading a history book( 70’s)where it stated that Arnold was hanged. I did a little checking and at one time it was common for history books to list Arnold as being hanged. You were correct, he died in England 1801.


75 posted on 10/01/2010 6:26:33 PM PDT by omegadawn (qualified)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Michael.SF.
Lee chose to fight not for a still young country, one with a tremendously divisive flaw, but for the land of his birthplace, Virginia. His father fought to overcome tyranny and was a hero.

In these United States, prior to the War, the States had much more stroke than they do today, and far greater self-determination. The federal Government was still limited to Federal things, and was not a National Government, but a Federal one.

The incredible array of usurpations of power, both through taxation, regulation, the Commerce Clause misinterpretation, and a host of other furtherances of abuse of the Constitution present the modern American with a very different view of the duties, powers, and responsibilities of Federal and State Governments, so different that the Government of today and the government of 1850 would be unrecognizeable to most Americans were they catapulted ahead or back in time to the other time frame.

With little exception, the states were far more soverign then, and often the dominant form of government any one person encountered after a mayor or County Sheriff.

As such, loyalty toward one's State was indeed honorable. Just after the Revolution, many property owners, among them my ancestors, swore oaths of loyalty to the soverign State they lived in. No doubt the Lee family had like ties to Virginia.

76 posted on 10/01/2010 6:34:22 PM PDT by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: matthew fuller
This Christian-gentleman's last words were, "Strike the Tent."

Lee's last words were, "Mpfhhhh." He walked in the door from a vestry meeting, hung up his coat, and had a stroke, which left him unable to speak.

77 posted on 10/01/2010 6:36:54 PM PDT by sphinx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: FredZarguna
Grant was also a much better President than history has remembered; unfortunately we've allowed too many Southerners to write our subsequent history.

I'm not sure the South has a monopoly on bad historians. I think Shelby Foote was from Mississippi, and he had unmost respect and affection for Grant. In retrospect, so did legions of Confederate enlisted men who survived the war.

My personal favorite was Bruce Catton. Now, he was a Northerner...from Michigan.

Doris Kearns Goodwin is from New York, and I bet her conclusions and mine rarely meet.

I just think history is fun, and when I start a work by someone incapable of rational thought I tend to move on early.

I'll read anything and everything about R. E. Lee. I just think Grant was as fine a general as Lee, probably better, and he proved it over and over and over again long before Appomattox.

Don't you think it's funny that someone on FR can put up any story on the Civil War and it draws readers and opinions for days in just an instant? I believe the Civil War brought greatness out of the woodwork, and one person can be great without diminishing another.

78 posted on 10/01/2010 6:43:09 PM PDT by stevem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: silentreignofheroes

PC?’’ ‘’oilstick”’? ad hominems don’t make a good verbal starting point. Listen pal, you couldn’t be further from the truth. I prefer the America under the Stars and Stripes. Not the Stars and Bars. The South lost and the North won, if you want to get prosaic about it. If it hadn’t, what rights could someone like me be afforded under the constitution of the CSA?


79 posted on 10/01/2010 6:46:46 PM PDT by jmacusa (Two wrongs don't make a right. But they can make it interesting.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: BigReb555

I always think Lee was born too late. He should have been one of the Founding Fathers.


80 posted on 10/01/2010 6:47:22 PM PDT by Tijeras_Slim (Live jubtabulously!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121-126 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson