Skip to comments.
Don't Ask Don't Tell thrown out by Fed Judge in Riverside
Fox News
| 10/12/2010
| Fox News
Posted on 10/12/2010 12:44:19 PM PDT by freedumb2003
Breaking...
TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: activistcourts; cultureofcorruption; dontaskdonttell; godsinblackrobes; homosexualagenda; judicialactivism; judicialtyranny; shadowgovernment
Shep Smith on FNN just announced a judge in Riverside California has said banning gays in the military is unconstitutional, rendering DADT moot.
Breaking -- I will try to find a posted source
To: freedumb2003
2
posted on
10/12/2010 12:45:54 PM PDT
by
Hoodlum91
(There's a strange odor coming from the White House. Smells like BO.)
To: freedumb2003
It would seem that a circus clown has escaped.
3
posted on
10/12/2010 12:46:54 PM PDT
by
Hans
To: freedumb2003
Another moron in a black robe playing god and going beyond his authority.
4
posted on
10/12/2010 12:46:54 PM PDT
by
FlingWingFlyer
(Less than 30 days to go to election day. I'm giddier than a TV weatherman during hurricane season.)
To: freedumb2003
Another moron in a black robe playing god and going beyond his authority.
5
posted on
10/12/2010 12:47:05 PM PDT
by
FlingWingFlyer
(Less than 30 days to go to election day. I'm giddier than a TV weatherman during hurricane season.)
To: freedumb2003
Judger needs to re-read the Constitution.
The Legislative Branch regulates the military, not the Judicial.
Hence the UCMJ.
6
posted on
10/12/2010 12:47:19 PM PDT
by
Lusis
("Underlying most arguments against the free market is a lack of belief in freedom itself.")
To: freedumb2003
FR Clock now 11 minutes fast. FR no longer on the cutting edge with breaking news stories.
To: freedumb2003
Y'know, these guys CAN be recalled...
Question is how do recalls get started?
8
posted on
10/12/2010 12:47:30 PM PDT
by
skeeter
To: freedumb2003
Judge needs to re-read the Constitution.
The Legislative Branch regulates the military, not the Judicial.
Hence the UCMJ.
9
posted on
10/12/2010 12:47:30 PM PDT
by
Lusis
("Underlying most arguments against the free market is a lack of belief in freedom itself.")
To: freedumb2003
Didn’t another judge do this already a few weeks ago?
10
posted on
10/12/2010 12:47:45 PM PDT
by
edcoil
(No "D's" for me!)
To: freedumb2003
If the ban is “unconstitutional”, then why did it take all of this time for them to “realize” it?
Has our Constitution changed since it was originally written?
11
posted on
10/12/2010 12:47:53 PM PDT
by
a fool in paradise
(Ask yourself,where does Saudi Arabia fit on a scale of "passive" to "moderate" to "extremist" Islam?)
To: freedumb2003
Great, we don’t need no stinking Congress to decide our laws, there is a judge in Riverside, CA, who knows it all. One less thing to worry about.
To: freedumb2003
Amazing how it's never hard to defeat the ‘standing’ argument on something like this, yet to compel an elected official who must meet particular terms to assume the office which they are elected to, no one appears to have the standing to demand such documents.
A shame that Obama feels that the only thing that needs to be vigorously defended is his own public documents.
13
posted on
10/12/2010 12:48:32 PM PDT
by
kingu
(Favorite Sticker: Lost hope, and Obama took my change.)
To: freedumb2003
Whenever I hear about one of these "Federal Judge throws out -insert common sense law here- because it is unconstitutional" stories, I think of some nut who just got his hands on some cheap booze spouting nonsense into an open microphone.
14
posted on
10/12/2010 12:49:00 PM PDT
by
frogjerk
(I believe in unicorns, fairies and pro-life Democrats.)
To: freedumb2003
I can almost hear thousands of service men and women now saying “I won’t re-up, retire early”, and hear Military Morale sink to a new low-I don’t have much faith in it, but let’s hope the Obama Administration decides to appeal this ruling.
If one think has become patently clear over the last year and half: WE have to get controll, and reign in the Courts-They are out of controll!
15
posted on
10/12/2010 12:49:33 PM PDT
by
JSDude1
(DARE TO DREAM THE DREAM...Work like you want 100 Seats on November 2! -J.S.)
To: freedumb2003
Isn’t DADT an Executive Order?
I’m confused. How is it unconstitutional again?
16
posted on
10/12/2010 12:50:08 PM PDT
by
GeronL
(http://libertyfic.proboards.com <--- My Fiction/ Science Fiction Board)
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson