Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

EXCLUSIVE: CBS2 Reporter Threatens Journalist Over Rahm Questioning
Big Journalism ^ | 10/13/10 | Dana Loesch

Posted on 10/13/2010 10:25:37 AM PDT by Nachum

We’ve often said that the media “protects” President Obama but this video from WIND radio host and Big Blogs contributor William Kelly shows this allegation literally.

Kelly, a Chicagoan, was there when Rahm Emmanuel was pressing the flesh, kissing babies, and greeting reporters. Emmanuel didn’t account for unassuming Kelly to fire off serious journalistic questions more pressing than the requisite “how’s it feel to be back?”

Kelly didn’t account for was the manner in which Chicago reporters behaved. Are these reporters or palace guards? In the video you see them physically move to shield Emmanuel from Kelly’s questioning, as though their backs alone would deflect the questions. Kelly is berated and shoved by mainstream media journalists, but the scene stealer is when CBS2’s Jay Levine (who has not responded to my requests for comment) screams at Kelly, “Let him finish or I’m gonna deck you!”

Fireworks begin at about the 1:00 mark:

(Excerpt) Read more at bigjournalism.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Illinois
KEYWORDS: cbs2; chicagoway; enemedia; jaylevine; journalist; mediabias; ministryofinfo; ministryoftruth; rahm; rahmemmanuel; reporter; shenanigans; threatens
The Chicago way
1 posted on 10/13/2010 10:25:45 AM PDT by Nachum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Nachum

We need IDing of these people. They should be outed for working as political thugs and not reporters.


2 posted on 10/13/2010 10:29:34 AM PDT by rod1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jet Jaguar; NorwegianViking; ExTexasRedhead; HollyB; FromLori; EricTheRed_VocalMinority; ...

The list, ping

Let me know if you would like to be on or off the ping list

http://www.nachumlist.com/


3 posted on 10/13/2010 10:31:46 AM PDT by Nachum (The complete Obama list at www.nachumlist.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

The bamster’s poison dwarf and kapo..


4 posted on 10/13/2010 10:32:06 AM PDT by sheik yerbouty ( Make America and the world a jihad free zone!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Unbelievable.


5 posted on 10/13/2010 10:32:20 AM PDT by BenLurkin (This post is not a statement of fact. It is merely a personal opinion -- or humor -- or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Wonder if this guy will be fired after it hits the net.


6 posted on 10/13/2010 10:34:08 AM PDT by RummyChick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick

I suspect the CBS guy will get an award from his peers next time they gather to give recognition.


7 posted on 10/13/2010 10:38:55 AM PDT by BenLurkin (This post is not a statement of fact. It is merely a personal opinion -- or humor -- or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

This really needs wide play!


8 posted on 10/13/2010 10:39:19 AM PDT by roses of sharon (I can do all things through Him who strengthens me. Philippians 4:13)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Isn’t Rahm cool the way he drapes his sport coat over his shoulder? And those sharp ballerina turns when he didn’t like the questions were cool too.


9 posted on 10/13/2010 10:44:22 AM PDT by layman (Card Carrying Infidel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

The “protector” reporters are hoping Rahm will give them better “access” because they turned on their troublesome colleague who was trying to be an actual reporter.


10 posted on 10/13/2010 10:45:29 AM PDT by Steely Tom (Obama goes on long after the thrill of Obama is gone)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

One of the responses to this over at bigjournalism tickles me:

From Fleeceme:

If they wanted to shoot a puff piece with Rahm, maybe they should have done it somewhere private. I mean, all those icky normal people walking around, who knows which one might be a crazy right wing extremist that will go all psycho and ask a question.

I’m thinking something by the river, oh, oh, even better, howabout Rahm rescuing a drowning child out of the river? Oh, and we can make the child Palestinian, to show Rahm can cross petty world squabbles in pursuit of greater good for the common man. We are so lucky Obama fired him.


11 posted on 10/13/2010 10:50:06 AM PDT by Auntie Mame (Fear not tomorrow. God is already there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

The media is employed by and controlled by the liberal leftist elite. Any surprises here?


12 posted on 10/13/2010 10:50:45 AM PDT by Leftism is Mentally Deranged (Annoying liberals is my goal. I will not be silenced.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Keep an eye on these reporters. Looks like they just might end up with a job on RE’s staff. Oh, my mistake. They already have one.


13 posted on 10/13/2010 10:52:16 AM PDT by taxesareforever (Release Staff Sgt. Frank Wuterich and let him and his family get on with their lives.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

A CLASSIC! With just a little over 300 views on YouTube it’s got a long ways to go before it can break through the preprogrammed sensibilities of the great unwashed. I’ll do my part.


14 posted on 10/13/2010 11:06:49 AM PDT by ForGod'sSake (You have just two choices: SUBMIT or RESIST with everything you've got!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum; Toddsterpatriot

Looks like Rahm has already been chosen by the press as our next Mayor, and they (the press) are simply angling for their positions at the press room buffet table.


15 posted on 10/13/2010 11:06:57 AM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Here’s the vid:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sce0TLA5UYE&feature=player_embedded


16 posted on 10/13/2010 11:18:07 AM PDT by RushIsMyTeddyBear (Not under the influence of Hope-nosis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
Journo-listas.


Frowning takes 68 muscles.
Smiling takes 6.
Pulling this trigger takes 2.
I'm lazy.

17 posted on 10/13/2010 11:19:30 AM PDT by The Comedian (Keep talking while I reload...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rod1; maggief; onyx; penelopesire; Liz; hoosiermama; SE Mom; Velveeta; retrokitten
January 16, 2009
Mary Ann Childers joins strategic communications firm

Long-time Chicago anchor and reporter Mary Ann Childers, who was among those cut last spring in a cost-cutting sweep of CBS-owned WBBM-Ch. 2, has joined the Res Publica Group, a Chicago-based strategic communications firm.

*snip*
drawing on her vast experience to help with strategy, media training, marketing, branding, reputation management and crisis counsel.

Before Childers' 1994 arrival at WBBM -- where husband Jay Levine continues as chief correspondent –- she spent 14 years at ABC-owned WLS-Ch. 7

~~~~

Jay Levine

The other pushy 'journalist' I found .. Charles Thomas .. ABC Chicago .. obviously without the glasses.


18 posted on 10/13/2010 11:26:44 AM PDT by STARWISE (The overlords are in place .. we are a nation under siege .. pray, go Galt & hunker down)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Auntie Mame

Oh, that is absolutely priceless. I hope Fleeceme is a FReeper.


19 posted on 10/13/2010 11:32:05 AM PDT by lonevoice (Those who dance are considered insane by those who can't hear the music)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

Those two are RE PR people, not reporters.

Pathetic.


20 posted on 10/13/2010 11:38:33 AM PDT by maggief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Press bookmark.


21 posted on 10/13/2010 11:52:51 AM PDT by IrishCatholic (No local Communist or Socialist Party Chapter? Join the Democrats, it's the same thing!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum; abb; a fool in paradise; Tolerance Sucks Rocks; conservatism_IS_compassion

Uhhh, part of doing my part was to ping a few media watchers with some ping lists of their own. Can I get a DUH!


22 posted on 10/13/2010 12:17:09 PM PDT by ForGod'sSake (You have just two choices: SUBMIT or RESIST with everything you've got!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy
Wow! Jay looked tough. LOL!

I loved the, "You're not even a reporter"

Don't violate the temple of the media. They're reporters! More like clowns.

23 posted on 10/13/2010 12:35:41 PM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (Math is hard. Harder if you're stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Let’s just hope that a now-chastened Kelly doesn’t suddenly become so remorseful that he decides to crawl into the trunk of his car, tie himself up, and then put some bullet holes in the back of his head. It’s happened before...


24 posted on 10/13/2010 12:49:23 PM PDT by Clioman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Natchum, no offense meant to you, but I don’t think the person who wrote this “counts” English as his or her native language. It says, “Emmanuel didn’t account for unassuming Kelly to fire off ...” when obviously what is meant here is that Emmanuel didn’t count on Kelly firing off questions. Then the third paragraph starts off thus: “Kelly didn’t account for was the manner in which Chicago reporters behaved...,” which doesn’t seem to be a complete sentence, and again, what is meant is that Kelly wasn’t counting on Chicago reporters behaving that way. Are there no editors left on the planet? Is this writer being paid for his or her work?


25 posted on 10/13/2010 1:37:48 PM PDT by La Lydia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

I must remember to email the station (or post to their website) and ask them if the station’s chief correspondence job requires prior WWF experience. One would assume it is a must.


26 posted on 10/13/2010 1:48:36 PM PDT by rod1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Pathetic. These Chicago “security guards” have been around a long time. They control the news in Chicago and the faithful tune in daily to see what is news.

Best choice I ever made was to leave the place.


27 posted on 10/13/2010 1:51:12 PM PDT by 4Godsoloved..Hegave (Trusting God is a full time job, He is on duty 24/7 .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: La Lydia
Nachum, no offense meant to you, but I don’t think the person who wrote this “counts” English as his or her native language

True enough. I think the video was indictment enough :)

28 posted on 10/13/2010 2:05:40 PM PDT by Nachum (The complete Obama list at www.nachumlist.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
Can't let hostile actual questions interrupt real journalists doing their real job...

"Mayor Emmanuel, why do people like you so much and think you are so great?"

And if Jay Levine sported a single muscle, those could have been considered terroristic threats, instead of comedy.

29 posted on 10/13/2010 2:15:37 PM PDT by dead (I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum; paltz; Trueblackman; Clinton's a liar; kristinn; icwhatudo; melancholy; Cacique

Real reporters should check their sixes early and often. Just ask Emily Miller.


30 posted on 10/13/2010 5:30:54 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Muslims are not the problem, the rest of the world is! /s)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #31 Removed by Moderator

To: rod1; ForGod'sSake; PGalt
We need IDing of these people. They should be outed for working as political thugs and not reporters.
See, that's just the trouble - so many informed, educated and public spirited people (like you) actually believe that reporters are a separate class from "we the people."

There is nothing in the First Amendment, or anywhere else in the Constitution, which says or implies any such thing.

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
Just because journalists call themselves "the press" does not put them in a class separate from "the people." What, can I call myself "speech" and become privileged in some way over you? Do you not have the right to buy and operate a printing press? Are your rights lesser than someone else's, just because you haven't bought a printing press yet?

The actual problem is that the wire services have unified and homogenized journalism. Starting with the Associated Press, which began in 1848. Adam Smith famously stated that

"People of the same trade seldom meet together even for merriment and diversion, but the conversation ends in a conspiracy against the public or some contrivance to raise prices." - Adam Smith
The "association" of newspapers via the AP performs the function of bringing journalists together in such a way as to enervate the competition among them. Why is it that no reporter will disagree with the thesis that "all journalists are objective?" Simple - journalists changed the business model of the newspaper business when they joined the AP. The AP gives each newspaper a cornucopia of news stories, but it is expensive and the newspaper must get value for that expense. The only way to do so is to vouch for the reporters on the other end of the wire whom the newspaper does not employ and may not even know. How does the newspaper do that? Simple - by promoting the conceit that "all journalists are objective."

The massive propaganda campaign in which we have all been immersed all our lives, to the effect that "all journalists are objective," is nothing other than " a conspiracy against the public." It is a conspiracy to promote the conceit that journalists are better citizens than you or I, with the implication that the country should actually be run by journalists, with "the people" going to the polls pro forma and simply rubber stamping the decisions of the journalists.

Well, guess what! Journalists are a special interest.

Journalism's interest is in promoting the credulity of the people in accepting the confidence game I just outlined. "If it bleeds it leads," "Man Bites Dog rather than Dog Bites Man," and "There's nothing more worthless than yesterday's newspaper" are defining characteristics of the interest of journalism (which lies in interesting the public) which is an entirely different matter than "the public interest." Many things would interest the public but would be illegal, precisely because they are deemed to not be in the public interest. Reports of bad news generally interest the public - but of course the incidents themselves are not in the public interest.

The wisest and most cautious of us all frequently gives credit to stories which he himself is afterwards both ashamed and astonished that he could possibly think of believing . . .

It is acquired wisdom and experience only that teach incredulity,
and they very seldom teach it enough.
  - Adam Smith

The public interest would be far better served if the public learned to treat journalism with a lot more "incredulity." And with full understanding that journalism, even when true, is not generally all of the truth - and that "Half the truth is often a great lie."

The Right to Know

32 posted on 10/14/2010 2:12:15 AM PDT by conservatism_IS_compassion (DRAFT PALIN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson