Posted on 10/26/2010 9:39:34 AM PDT by shortstop
I read this as Lonsberry asking the rhetorical question, not making a recommendation. Quite frankly, I ask the same question about George Soros every day.
The CIA needs to dump about a million phony documents on this clown and let him have at it. All kinds of disinformation that will serve our interests.
And when they get some positive results, some black bag operatives need to throw Assssange in a trunk and find a Chilean mine for him to visit.
He’ll live forever like OJ and Sharpton.....
Because Mitch Rapp is a fictional character.
You did hear about the 2008 election didn’t you? Did you see who the president is now? That’s your answer. Hell, the Wikileaks individual has probably received a secret medal, a cash award and a certificate of appreciation from the Democratic party.
I read it differently. Way too close to incitement for my tastes. If the wikileaks guys are guilty of murder as the guy claims, there is due process to handle it.
I think that he’ll ultimately get what’s coming to him.
Just a matter of time...
I was wondering the very same thing last night. Maybe what he is leaking is what someone in the government wants him to leak, but most likely the CIA is just not doing it's job.
I agree. But the larger question is WHAT has the Pentagon done about the obvious problem with their vetting process for people with Security Clearances.
I have a solution ANY DumocRAT is suspect.
AND where is the outrage from ZERO. Noticably missing.
Because he’s only doing what the leftists at the top of the CIA want?
If he didn’t leak this stuff, they’d have to, as they did several times to the NY Slimes and the Washington ComPost in the Bush years.
There seems to be a deficit of gonads-or, even worse, complicity-at the highest level.
He’s still thought to be useful. That’s the only reason.
So we photoshop a picture of him taking a dump on the Koran and distribute through AlJazeera.
Who’s he gonna go to for safety after that?
Just so. The guy who passed all these files to Wikileaks was a gay soldier with a Top Secret security clearance, who was presumably mad about Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell.
According to news articles, he had been demoted for some unnamed offense, yet he didn’t lose his security clearance.
Also, he was in Afghanistan, and supposedly cleared to see those files. But he went into the Iraqi files and downloaded a ton of them. What ever happened to the “Need to Know” rule? Why was he allowed to access Iraqi files if his theater of operations was Afghanistan? Why was a demoted, loud-mouthed homosexual put into a position to do this?
Who were his superiors who allowed this to happen?
Absolutely no interest, apparently, on the part of the press or government.
Excerpt:
Julian Assange moves like a hunted man. In a noisy Ethiopian restaurant in Londons rundown Paddington district, he pitches his voice barely above a whisper to foil the Western intelligence agencies he fears.He demands that his dwindling number of loyalists use expensive encrypted cellphones and swaps his own as other men change shirts. He checks into hotels under false names, dyes his hair, sleeps on sofas and floors, and uses cash instead of credit cards, often borrowed from friends.
Why is wikileaks guy not in Prison? The leaking of classified information. Is that not a Federal crime? What am I missing here? Can someone help me out on this?
I was wondering the same thing...
“Maybe what he is leaking is what someone in the government wants him to leak.”
Exactly that. He’s a shill for someone on the inside of our current administration.
Dont need to kill him. They could electronically kill his websites though. The person(s) who are leaking should be the target. Soros is enemy #1.
He is part of the system.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.