Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Fewer People Mean Less Government Cost: Planned Parenthood President
LifeSiteNews ^ | 10/26/10 | Kathleen Gilbert

Posted on 10/26/2010 4:13:32 PM PDT by wagglebee

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-39 next last
In an appearance on the Bill Press radio show, PP president Cecile Richards said that, although the costs of the federal health care bill already promise to skyrocket out of control, federal officials ought to consider covering birth control a priority because of the "cost savings" benefit of fewer children being born.

How long before she openly advocates just killing the "worthless eaters"?

1 posted on 10/26/2010 4:13:36 PM PDT by wagglebee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: cgk; Coleus; cpforlife.org; narses; Salvation; 8mmMauser
Pro-Life Ping
2 posted on 10/26/2010 4:14:21 PM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 185JHP; 230FMJ; Albion Wilde; Aleighanne; Alexander Rubin; Amos the Prophet; ...
Moral Absolutes Ping!

Freepmail wagglebee to subscribe or unsubscribe from the moral absolutes ping list.

FreeRepublic moral absolutes keyword search
[ Add keyword moral absolutes to flag FR articles to this ping list ]


3 posted on 10/26/2010 4:15:08 PM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

This is incredibly disturbing.


4 posted on 10/26/2010 4:18:55 PM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
Cecile Richards tells us that fewer people is a better condition for the rest of us.

I strongly encourage her to show us the way by jumping from a tall building or something.

We can judge if our lives have improved through her death (and I'd almost bet they will ~ in this one special case).

5 posted on 10/26/2010 4:20:08 PM PDT by muawiyah ("GIT OUT THE WAY" The Republicans are coming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
Lets just take this to the extreme. If society benefits from fewer people, wouldn't it benefit even more if there were 0 people... oh wait, that won't work . Obviously society benefits from productive citizens. Being productive is the key... not killing off the unwanted.
6 posted on 10/26/2010 4:20:18 PM PDT by flipper999 (tag you are it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

FEWER PEOPLE IN THE GOV'T MEANS LESS GOV'T COST!!!


7 posted on 10/26/2010 4:24:33 PM PDT by CommieCutter (A Centrist Democrat is now defined as: between Socialism and Communism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

OMG!


8 posted on 10/26/2010 4:28:06 PM PDT by tiki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

I’m sure she wants to deport all the Illegals????


9 posted on 10/26/2010 4:28:11 PM PDT by jacob allen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
I would argue the opposite. More people in a 1st world, modern environment means more productivity, more consumers of goods, more wage earners, more tax revenues and a benefit to us all. With new technologies we pollute less, can have a smaller environmental footprint and “be fruitful and multiply” as the Good Lord instructed us.

For years the God/People hating elitists have said we have to have less people (always US, never THEM) and man is a scourge on the planet.

God made the Earth for us and us for the Earth. He gave us a very intelligent mind to be creative and not wasteful. If only our souls were as good!

10 posted on 10/26/2010 4:29:26 PM PDT by Alas Babylon! (Those who expect to reap the blessings of freedom must-like men-undergo the fatigue of supporting it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Human extinction would also lower government costs.

These population control freaks are insane.


11 posted on 10/26/2010 4:33:37 PM PDT by A message
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Ms. Richards is espousing the ANTI-HUMAN world view shared by most liberals. People, human beings, are an ugly, defective race who always take more than they give, create nothing of beauty or value, and need to be eliminated.

This is the mindset that justifies the murders of tens of millions, hundreds of millions, in the name of the common good and the making of a better mankind.

Keep it in mind whenever you hear them speak, tell yourselves over and over, ANTI-HUMAN, ANTI-HUMAN, ANTI-HUMAN...


12 posted on 10/26/2010 4:35:45 PM PDT by BigBobber
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Bump!


13 posted on 10/26/2010 4:40:50 PM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

But that means less wealth created and less tax revenue.

But if she insists on less people, she can start with herself.


14 posted on 10/26/2010 4:49:57 PM PDT by rbosque (11 year Freeper! Combat Economist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

It’s obvious from looking at her. She is one of them, an alien. Not the kind from Mexico, either. Her fellow kind have infested the gov’t just like the stink bugs in the eastern US. I’ll bet under that perfectly symmetrical exterior she is filled with bug like creatures. Time to call the Men in Black.
And not Obama, since he is only half black.


15 posted on 10/26/2010 4:50:02 PM PDT by free from tyranny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CommieCutter

Exactly. You can shout that again. When I first read the headline, I thought that was what she meant. I thought, “that’s a mighty strange comment coming from someone at Planned Parenthood.” Then as I scrolled down the other headlines, I had to go back up to read the article once it dawned on me what it really meant.


16 posted on 10/26/2010 4:52:34 PM PDT by beaversmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: beaversmom

Euthanasia for Liberals will also reduce government expense.


17 posted on 10/26/2010 5:03:44 PM PDT by EQAndyBuzz (Remember March 23, 1775. Remember March 23, 2010)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: EQAndyBuzz

...and don’t forget, it would help the Earth too.


18 posted on 10/26/2010 5:17:03 PM PDT by beaversmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Given where and how PP operates, Richards really meant that fewer black people mean less government cost. Racist scumbags.


19 posted on 10/26/2010 5:19:54 PM PDT by Mr. Silverback (Anyone who says we need illegals to do the jobs Americans won't do has never watched "Dirty Jobs.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Silverback
Given where and how PP operates, Richards really meant that fewer black people mean less government cost. Racist scumbags.

You nailed it!

20 posted on 10/26/2010 5:22:15 PM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-39 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson