Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Vanity: Mario Apuzzo's BC case is docketed at SCOTUS (O must respond by Nov 3?)
Vanity - Apuzzo blog | 10-26-2010 | Frantzie

Posted on 10/26/2010 8:22:49 PM PDT by Frantzie

http://puzo1.blogspot.com/

Kerchner et al v Obama/Congress/Pelosi et al Petition for Writ of Certiorari filed 30 Sep 2010 and docketed 04 Oct 2010 with the U.S. Supreme Court - Washington Times National Weekly edition - 25, 18, and 11 Oct 2010 issues, page 5.

U.S. Supreme Court Docket Number: 10-446. Response from defendants due to the U.S. Supreme Court by 3 Nov 2010.

[Update 13 Oct 2010: Kerchner v Obama - Supreme Court Activity]


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: apuzzo; birthcertificate; certifigate; christineodonnell; election2010; harryreid; healthcare; hussein; ineligible; kerchner; kerchnervobama; marioapuzzo; military; muslim; naturalborncitizen; obama; palin; sharonangle; teaparty; usurper
O, Congress and the other defendants must respond by Nov 3? Day after the election? Is anyone following this?
1 posted on 10/26/2010 8:22:54 PM PDT by Frantzie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Frantzie

So many false starts. I’d like to believe something will happen, but it’s difficult. I have to admit I gave up following the details of all this stuff a while ago.


2 posted on 10/26/2010 8:28:21 PM PDT by Jack Black ( Whatever is left of American patriotism is now identical with counter-revolution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Frantzie

Won’t zero and his entourage be in India?


3 posted on 10/26/2010 8:28:25 PM PDT by neodad (USS Vincennes (CG 49) "Freedom's Fortress")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jack Black

Apuzzo’s case was the sleeper and the best constructed case. It has slowly cone through the court system. It will still have to go through Scotus then back to appeals then back to Scotus as far as a I know.

I am sure one of the Obama shills will show up here any minute.


4 posted on 10/26/2010 8:32:12 PM PDT by Frantzie (Imam Ob*m* & Democrats support the VICTORY MOSQUE & TV supports Imam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: neodad

‘Won’t zero and his entourage be in India?’

good, they can all stay there.


5 posted on 10/26/2010 8:32:25 PM PDT by television is just wrong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: neodad

Yea,unfortunately a week before the earthquake, sunami, and volcanic activities.


6 posted on 10/26/2010 8:35:05 PM PDT by hope
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: neodad

Yea,unfortunately a week before the earthquake, sunami, and volcanic activities.


7 posted on 10/26/2010 8:35:38 PM PDT by hope
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: neodad
Won’t zero and his entourage be in India?

Do we have an extradition agreement with India?

We should check to make sure.

8 posted on 10/26/2010 8:42:21 PM PDT by Michael.SF. (Current count of friends/family who have abandoned Obama: 11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: television is just wrong

Probably just wishful thinking on my part, but it’s crossed my mind that he might stay overseas. He knows he’s going to lose all his political capital on the 2nd, his beloved MSM is already starting to turn on him, the eligibility question is getting closer to coming unglued, the judges in both the Virginia & Florida Obamacare cases are telegraphing that they think there are constitutional issues with the law, there are rumors Nancy Pelosi is going to turn on him, and the “Washington Insider” that keeps showing up on the Internet mentioned a scandal that is about to blow up in the Whitehouse.


9 posted on 10/26/2010 8:43:37 PM PDT by Jess79
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Michael.SF.
Do we have an extradition agreement with India? We should check to make sure.

If such an agreement exists, we should shred it, if it keeps the Kenyan away for good!!

10 posted on 10/26/2010 8:48:33 PM PDT by Yossarian (A pro-life democrat is one who holds out for something in return for his pro-abortion vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Frantzie

This is a Petition for a Writ of Certiorari. The Petitioner has to be granted certiorari for the case either to proceed to a hearing before the SCOTUS or to go back to the Appeals court on remand. If certiorari is not granted, it’s not going anywhere.


11 posted on 10/26/2010 8:54:50 PM PDT by EDINVA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: BP2; Fred Nerks; afraidfortherepublic

What do you know about this ???


12 posted on 10/26/2010 9:01:41 PM PDT by Tennessee Nana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: television is just wrong; neodad; All
"‘Won’t zero and his entourage be in India?’"


13 posted on 10/26/2010 9:17:31 PM PDT by musicman (Until I see the REAL Long Form Vault BC, he's just "PRES__ENT" Obama = Without "ID")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: EDINVA
That may be why the attacks on Thomas have started, they want to have him recuse himself from this one due to his wife voicing an opinion on the matter (or at least I'm told she has, I haven't found it myself. My guess is that they'll grant the writ due to the fact that everything is put together so well. Then, however, it'll have to go back down and worm all the way back up, something that will surely take more than two years. Since that's after the next election, the Court can either hear it after several states have demanded the BC before letting him on the 2012 ballot which would be solid grounds, or refuse to hear it because Barry is already out of office in which case a separate case would need to be built asking for a ruling on what constitutes a natural born citizen for reasons of being placed on a ballot.

JMHO

Regards

14 posted on 10/26/2010 9:22:46 PM PDT by Rashputin (Obama is already insane and sequestered on golf courses or vacations so you won't know it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Frantzie

The Wash Times dates u lists are paid ads right?


15 posted on 10/26/2010 9:25:23 PM PDT by bushpilot1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tennessee Nana

interesting, but I know nothing more.


16 posted on 10/26/2010 9:31:27 PM PDT by Fred Nerks (FAIR DINKUM!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Tennessee Nana

Getting docketed means nothing. Every petition filed is docketed. Obama is under no obligation to respond and even if he doesn’t, there is an almost zero chance it will be accepted for review.

The upside is that if the GOP wins big, the USSC members would feel less restrained in making a decision to grant cert.

It is also possible the court will punt and send it back down to either the Circuit Court or trial court for further proceedings.


17 posted on 10/26/2010 9:34:29 PM PDT by SeaHawkFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: musicman
Geez, Joe -- for 7-11 & DD you gotta go to Pocky-Stan!!
18 posted on 10/26/2010 9:35:10 PM PDT by brityank (The more I learn about the Constitution, the more I realise this Government is UNconstitutional !! )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Rashputin

If the petition IS granted, it could be set for a hearing at the SCOTUS without remand back to the lower court. It doesn’t necessarily get remanded.

Certiorari is granted in only about 8% of the cases brought to SCOTUS, so odds don’t favor any given petition, tho these issues here are well ripe for a decision.

I think Mrs. Thomas did something recently with a Tea Party group, as well as demanding an apology of Anita Hill. But I haven’t heard - and can’t imagine - that she’d made a comment about an issue that would be brought before the Court.


19 posted on 10/26/2010 9:40:47 PM PDT by EDINVA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Jess79

they will just be throwing each other under the bus.


20 posted on 10/26/2010 10:12:35 PM PDT by television is just wrong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Frantzie

        
No. 10-446
Title:
Charles Kerchner, Jr., et al., Petitioners
v.
Barack H. Obama, President of the United States, et al.
Docketed: October 4, 2010
Lower Ct: United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
  Case Nos.: (09-4209)
  Decision Date: July 2, 2010

~~~Date~~~  ~~~~~~~Proceedings  and  Orders~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Sep 30 2010 Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 3, 2010)



~~Name~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~    ~~~~~~~Address~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~   ~~Phone~~~
Attorneys for Petitioners:
Mario Apuzzo 185 Gatzmer Avenue (732)-521-1900
Jamesburg, NJ  08831
apuzzo@erols.com
Party name: Charles Kerchner, et al.
Attorneys for Respondents:
Neal Kumar Katyal Acting Solicitor General (202) 514-2217
United States Department of Justice
950 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Washington, DC  20530-0001
SupremeCtBriefs@USDOJ
Party name: Barack H. Obama, President of the United States, et al.

21 posted on 10/26/2010 10:28:26 PM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Frantzie

The current administration can use armed Black Panthers at polling stations.

This will go nowhere.

As long as Obama is in power, the people of the US have no standing.

None.


22 posted on 10/27/2010 1:20:06 AM PDT by NoLibZone (Homosexuals oppose diversity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tennessee Nana

I know nothing about it. Just reading and learning. I like the idea that he might stay overseas. He wants to be first in everything. President in Exile would be a first.


23 posted on 10/27/2010 2:06:52 AM PDT by afraidfortherepublic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Rashputin

Someone is trying to get John Roberts off the SCOTUS also—hmmmmm.


24 posted on 10/27/2010 6:19:16 PM PDT by dandiegirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: dandiegirl

Ping


25 posted on 10/27/2010 6:29:15 PM PDT by A Mississippian (Proud 7th generaion Mississippian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Frantzie

There is no requirement that anyone respond to a petition for a Writ of Certiorari. Various parties are offered the opportunity to respond but they really don’t have to.
Doesn’t anyone remember Berg v Obama? That’s the appeal where everyone thought that Obama was going to have to show his birth certificate to Justice David Souter.
Obama not only didn’t show his birth certificate to Justice Souter, his attorneys did not respond to the petition at all.
When the defendant in a suit on appeal doesn’t respond, that’s the same as saying, “we trust the Supreme Court to meet in conference and to render a decision on this petition without any input from us.”


26 posted on 10/27/2010 7:02:24 PM PDT by jamese777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dandiegirl

“Someone is trying to get John Roberts off the SCOTUS also—hmmmmm.”

That snake in the grass deserves to be booted. But it’s not because of these eligibility cases that he and Thomas are being harassed. It’s the upcoming deathcare cases.


27 posted on 10/28/2010 2:23:52 AM PDT by BocoLoco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Frantzie

obumpa


28 posted on 11/02/2010 7:34:24 PM PDT by Dajjal (Justice Robert Jackson was wrong -- the Constitution IS a suicide pact.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson