Vanity: Mario Apuzzo's BC case is docketed at SCOTUS (O must respond by Nov 3?)

Vanity - Apuzzo blog | 10-26-2010 | Frantzie

[Frantzie]

http://puzo1.blogspot.com/

Kerchner et al v Obama/Congress/Pelosi et al Petition for Writ of Certiorari filed 30 Sep 2010 and docketed 04 Oct 2010 with the U.S. Supreme Court - Washington Times National Weekly edition - 25, 18, and 11 Oct 2010 issues, page 5.

U.S. Supreme Court Docket Number: 10-446. Response from defendants due to the U.S. Supreme Court by 3 Nov 2010.

[Update 13 Oct 2010: Kerchner v Obama - Supreme Court Activity]

[Red Steel]

        

No. 10-446
Title:	Charles Kerchner, Jr., et al., Petitioners v. Barack H. Obama, President of the United States, et al.
Docketed:	October 4, 2010
Lower Ct:	United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Case Nos.:	(09-4209)
Decision Date:	July 2, 2010

~~~Date~~~	~~~~~~~Proceedings  and  Orders~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Sep 30 2010	Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 3, 2010)

---

~~Name~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~	~~~~~~~Address~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~	~~Phone~~~
Attorneys for Petitioners:
Mario Apuzzo	185 Gatzmer Avenue	(732)-521-1900
	Jamesburg, NJ  08831
	apuzzo@erols.com
Party name: Charles Kerchner, et al.
Attorneys for Respondents:
Neal Kumar Katyal	Acting Solicitor General	(202) 514-2217
	United States Department of Justice
	950 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
	Washington, DC  20530-0001
	SupremeCtBriefs@USDOJ
Party name: Barack H. Obama, President of the United States, et al.

[NoLibZone]

The current administration can use armed Black Panthers at polling stations.

This will go nowhere.

As long as Obama is in power, the people of the US have no standing.

None.

[afraidfortherepublic]

I know nothing about it. Just reading and learning. I like the idea that he might stay overseas. He wants to be first in everything. President in Exile would be a first.

[dandiegirl]

Someone is trying to get John Roberts off the SCOTUS also—hmmmmm.

[A Mississippian]

Ping

[jamese777]

There is no requirement that anyone respond to a petition for a Writ of Certiorari. Various parties are offered the opportunity to respond but they really don’t have to.
Doesn’t anyone remember Berg v Obama? That’s the appeal where everyone thought that Obama was going to have to show his birth certificate to Justice David Souter.
Obama not only didn’t show his birth certificate to Justice Souter, his attorneys did not respond to the petition at all.
When the defendant in a suit on appeal doesn’t respond, that’s the same as saying, “we trust the Supreme Court to meet in conference and to render a decision on this petition without any input from us.”

[BocoLoco]

“Someone is trying to get John Roberts off the SCOTUS also—hmmmmm.”

That snake in the grass deserves to be booted. But it’s not because of these eligibility cases that he and Thomas are being harassed. It’s the upcoming deathcare cases.

[Dajjal]

obumpa