Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Wow... just when you think Mark Kirk couldn't sink any lower... he's now repeating the talking points used by Michael Moore and DailyKos!

Another thread recently revealed that Kirk has been endorsed by a group of black ministers who are far-left lifelong Chicago Democrats. This too, didn't even faze the Kirk apologists trying to convince conservatives to elect Jim Jeffords Jr.

Mark Kirk's veered so far left he's in "Bush lied, people died" Cindy Sheehan territory now. If he keeps it up, maybe Cindy just might endorse him by election day! I bet Marky would like that. And the Kirk apologists would be here in full force to defend him.

1 posted on 10/28/2010 10:27:32 PM PDT by BillyBoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last
To: BillyBoy

(sigh)

You just can’t fix stupid. And, Mark Kirk is apparently stupid on steroids!

We don’t need Republicans at any cost if they include morons like this!!


2 posted on 10/28/2010 10:30:20 PM PDT by DustyMoment (Go green - recycle Congress in 2010!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Maelstorm; fieldmarshaldj; Impy; PhilCollins; chicagolady; ChicagoConservative27; rabscuttle385; ...
=================================

MARK KIRK TRUTH FILE
JUST SAY NO TO SOCIALISM

" "The GREENEST candidate in the race... better than Barack Obama!"
-
Carol Calabresa/The Sierra Club, 2008
" The strength of our campaign remains the Democrats"
- Mark Kirk, 2008


Freepmail me to get ON or OFF this list.

=================================================


3 posted on 10/28/2010 10:31:00 PM PDT by BillyBoy (Impeach Obama? Yes We Can!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BillyBoy

FUMK!


4 posted on 10/28/2010 10:31:31 PM PDT by Jim Robinson (Rebellion is brewing!! Just vote them OUT!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BillyBoy

Hey Mark, can you PROVE Bush lied? Or, are you just going by your knee jerk reaction because you’re desperate to win your race for Senator?????


5 posted on 10/28/2010 10:32:03 PM PDT by SoldierDad (Proud Papa of two new Army Brats! Congrats to my Soldier son and his wife.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BillyBoy

He’s absolute scum. This crudball will do this to us every day if he gets elected.


6 posted on 10/28/2010 10:33:59 PM PDT by Luke21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BillyBoy

This Socialist fraud MUST be stopped !


7 posted on 10/28/2010 10:36:53 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (~"This is what happens when you find a stranger in the Amber Lamps !"~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BillyBoy

What an idiot! He voted for cap-and-tax, too, and I sent him a nasty letter about it even though I live in California. This guy gives RINOs a bad name.


8 posted on 10/28/2010 10:38:36 PM PDT by hsalaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BillyBoy

Well, I guess we can be thankful that this RINO POS has finally revealed himself for the back stabber he is. If he gets elected, he’s one vote we can’t count on.


9 posted on 10/28/2010 10:41:06 PM PDT by Dapper 26
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BillyBoy
BREAKING NEWS: The candidate's first name has been changed to Richard.

(/sarc)

11 posted on 10/28/2010 10:43:43 PM PDT by NordP (COMMON SENSE CONSERVATIVES - Love of Country, Less Govt, Stop Spending, No Govt Run Health Care!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BillyBoy

Watch Mr. Obama go for a “war crimes” trial to get attention off his troubles.


14 posted on 10/28/2010 10:47:05 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (Every decent man is ashamed of the government he lives under. ~Mencken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BillyBoy

This dumb bastard isn’t worth a bobbing bowel nugget. I hope he loses.


17 posted on 10/28/2010 10:59:19 PM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BillyBoy
Mark Kirk is ?.
18 posted on 10/28/2010 11:04:42 PM PDT by South40 (I can see November 2nd from my house!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BillyBoy

I read that the latest Wikileaks dump vindicated Bush on the WMD “lie”.


21 posted on 10/28/2010 11:12:57 PM PDT by abigailsmybaby ( I'm not going to buy my kids an encyclopedia. Let them walk to school like I did. Yogi Berra)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BillyBoy
The framers of our United States Constitution did not have the prescience to exclude the students of today's institutional indoctrination system, and the consumers of our driveby media from the vote on Nov 2.

Even the anti-American, freedom hating traitorous rats are allowed to vote. The Illinois rat party, unions, state government bureaucracy, and cemetery balloting system is arguably the most corrupt political borg machine in the country. Il moderates and even some rats want to pass on Giannoulias, but they fear Kirk because they are little girly men who watch Bravo, or they are the beneficiaries of Obamunism. In WV you join the klan, but this is what you have to do to win in Il. A senator is a representative of the people. If the people are weenies, the senator should embody the principles, or lack thereof, espoused by the people of Ill.

Unless Keyes decides to run independent really soon the choice is RINO or rat.

23 posted on 10/28/2010 11:34:49 PM PDT by Once-Ler (ProLife ProGun ProGod ProSoldier ProBusiness Republican for Palin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BillyBoy
Illinois Conservatives all need to support Mike Labno for Senate.

It's better the Democrat wins than Mark Kirk.
Their votes will be the same, but at least it won't humiliate the Republicans when Alexi Giannoulias does it.


25 posted on 10/28/2010 11:45:13 PM PDT by counterpunch (End the Government Monopoly!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BillyBoy

Oh man, this piece of sh!+ Kirk must lose.


26 posted on 10/28/2010 11:45:48 PM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BillyBoy

You’re not Kirk. You are not even a good imposter.


28 posted on 10/28/2010 11:58:07 PM PDT by Vendome (Don't take life so seriously... You'll never live through it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BillyBoy
 
Oh that's just rich, Bush's fault.  Never mind the fact that the United States Policy was by hook or crook to remove Sadaam, his sons and the rest of the cabal by peace if possible and by force if necessary. 
 
You can read all about it yourself.  It's not as if Bill Clinton and all 100 Senators didn't urge this as our policy.  But why let a little fact get in the way and under the lens of 911, I think it was time to say "Enough" and end our cessation of hostilities.  The terms of the cessation of hostilities had 28 mandates for the Iraqi government, 17 of which they regularly violated and shot at our airplanes damn near every week.
 
So Buh-Bye
 

The Iraq Liberation Act of 1998 H.R. 4655 (PL 105-338) was passed October 5, 1998, in the U.S. House of Representatives by an overwhelming majority. On October 7, the companion bill, S. 2525, passed unanimously in the U.S. Senate, "establishing a program [to] support a transition to democracy in Iraq." [1]

Speaking on behalf of the bill in the Senate, Trent Lott said:

"The United States has many means at its disposal to support the liberation of Iraq. At the height of the Cold War, we supported freedom fighters In Asia, Africa and Latin America willing to fight and die for a democratic future. We can and should do the same now in Iraq.
 
 
 
 
 
 
Statement on Signing the Iraq Liberation Act of 1998
October 31, 1998
 
Today I am signing into law H.R. 4655, the "Iraq Liberation Act of 1998." This Act makes clear that it is the sense of the Congress that the United States should support those elements of the Iraqi opposition that advocate a very different future for Iraq than the bitter reality of internal repression and external aggression that the current regime in Baghdad now offers.

Let me be clear on what the U.S. objectives are:

The United States wants Iraq to rejoin the family of nations as a freedom-loving and lawabiding member. This is in our interest and that of our allies within the region.

The United States favors an Iraq that offers its people freedom at home. I categorically reject arguments that this is unattainable due to Iraq's history or its ethnic or sectarian makeup. Iraqis deserve and desire freedom like everyone else.

The United States looks forward to a democratically supported regime that would permit us to enter into a dialogue leading to the reintegration of Iraq into normal international life.

My Administration has pursued, and will continue to pursue, these objectives through active application of all relevant United Nations Security Council resolutions. The evidence is overwhelming that such changes will not happen under the current Iraq leadership.

In the meantime, while the United States continues to look to the Security Council's efforts to keep the current regime's behavior in check, we look forward to new leadership in Iraq that has the support of the Iraqi people. The United States is providing support to opposition groups from all sectors of the Iraqi community that could lead to a popularly supported government.

On October 21, 1998, I signed into law the Omnibus Consolidated and Emergency Supplemental Appropriations Act, 1999, which made $8 million available for assistance to the Iraqi democratic opposition. This assistance is intended to help the democratic opposition unify, work together more effectively, and articulate the aspirations of the Iraqi people for a pluralistic, participatory political system that will include all of Iraq's diverse ethnic and religious groups. As required by the Emergency Supplemental Appropriations Act for FY 1998 (Public Law 105-174), the Department of State submitted a report to the Congress on plans to establish a program to support the democratic opposition. My Administration, as required by that statute, has also begun to implement a program to compile information regarding allegations of genocide, crimes against humanity, and war crimes by Iraq's current leaders as a step towards bringing to justice those directly responsible for such acts.

The Iraq Liberation Act of 1998 provides additional, discretionary authorities under which my Administration can act to further the objectives I outlined above. There are, of course, other important elements of U.S. policy. These include the maintenance of U.N. Security Council support efforts to eliminate Iraq's prohibited weapons and missile programs and economic sanctions that continue to deny the regime the means to reconstitute those threats to international peace and security. United States support for the Iraqi opposition will be carried out consistent with those policy objectives as well. Similarly, U.S. support must be attuned to what the opposition can effectively make use of as it develops over time. With those observations, I sign H.R. 4655 into law.

WILLIAM J. CLINTON

The White House, October 31, 1998.

 
two wars (started by Obama's predecessor) and the calamitous malfunctioning of key industries -- finance, housing, health care, energy and more. Yet, instead of an effort to come together to meet what are national crises, the right-wing echo chamber talks only about bringing the president down, and the Republican leaders embrace and parrot the extreme anger of the right. The so-called moderates duck and cover. No more mavericks allowed.
 
And here is a PDF of the Law:  http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=105_cong_public_laws&docid=f:publ338.105.pdf

29 posted on 10/28/2010 11:58:21 PM PDT by Vendome (Don't take life so seriously... You'll never live through it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BillyBoy
We lie about wmd’s.

and others.

We must..

31 posted on 10/29/2010 12:01:21 AM PDT by mmercier (innocence crossed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CHISEL32; Dengar01; darkangel82; rabscuttle385

Article of interest for you, Chisel...

He’s even worse than I thought. This ought to be the nail in the coffin for IL Republicans to vote against Kirk.


32 posted on 10/29/2010 12:57:33 AM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (~"This is what happens when you find a stranger in the Amber Lamps !"~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson