Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Labor Unions Fear Rollback of Rights if G.O.P. Wins
New York Times ^ | November 1m 2010 | Steven Greenhouse

Posted on 11/01/2010 9:33:27 AM PDT by lbryce

Organized labor is deeply worried about what happens after Tuesday.

By many measures, labor unions have been the Republicans’ fiercest, biggest-spending opponents in this year’s campaign, laying out more than $200 million in hopes of safeguarding the Democratic majorities in the House and Senate.

So it should be no surprise that Republicans, who appear to stand a good chance of winning control of the House or Senate, are signaling that they plan to push bills and strategies to undermine labor’s political clout and ability to grow.

“Republicans are likely to pursue a version of what Samuel Gompers often said: ‘Reward your friends and punish your enemies,’ ” said Joseph McCartin, a labor historian at Georgetown University.

One bill that is popular among Republicans would prohibit employers from ever agreeing to unionization through “card check,” a process often used today in which an employer recognizes a union as soon as a majority of workers sign pro-union cards — without holding a secret-ballot election. Another bill would severely crimp labor’s campaign spending by barring unions from using any portion of a union member’s dues money for political purposes unless the member first gives written permission.

A Republican-led House or Senate is expected to be more eager than a Democratic-controlled one to approve free trade agreements that unions oppose, and to be more reluctant to enact stimulus plans that unions have supported, like the recent bill that gave states $26 billion to help save the jobs of teachers, police and other government employees. A Republican-controlled House or Senate would probably block a labor-backed bill that would give firefighters and police officers in every state the right to unionize.

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Extended News; Government
KEYWORDS: democrats; organizedlabor; unions; unionscum
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 next last
To: lbryce

I predict civil war within the unions. They blew big bucks on this election and its all for nothing


21 posted on 11/01/2010 9:41:31 AM PDT by cripplecreek (Remember the River Raisin! (look it up))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wac3rd

“401K is the way.”

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/columns/Unions-target-your-private-retirement-savings-1398118-106409193.html


22 posted on 11/01/2010 9:45:19 AM PDT by kevao
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

Poor sweeties... no more tax money to fund their retirement and healthcare entitlements? You mean they’re going to have to live like the rest of us Americans? Poor babies!


23 posted on 11/01/2010 9:49:02 AM PDT by dps.inspect (the system is rigged...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lbryce
"Stroke of the pen. Law of the land. Kinda cool." -- Clinton presidential aide Paul Begala, July 1998

President Kennedy’s Executive Order 10998, allowing Federal unions, is what opened the door for public sector unions at the state and local level, which is leading to bankruptcy from bloated public sector salaries, benefits, and retirement plans. Businesses that offered plans like many governments have would go bankrupt. Gov’t entities will, too, eventually, but it will be much more painful.

This is why unions should again be outlawed for public employees.

.

24 posted on 11/01/2010 9:49:36 AM PDT by Elle Bee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reagan_fanatic
This should already be law.

...how 'bout the USSC BECK Decision...
http://www.mackinac.org/1403


25 posted on 11/01/2010 9:50:01 AM PDT by skinkinthegrass (Imam Zer0: DeathCARE, Is my only approved plan....to hell w/ free enterprise. :^)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: lbryce
The only union that the Democrats care about now is the SEIU, because it's membership is vastly non-White, non-American.

The queer elitists who dominate the Democratic "leadership" and idolize the illegal alien masses from Mexico as a "victim nationality" have nothing in common with the UAW / IAM midwestern working class and only respond to them as a matter of money. Other than that, they are repelled by them - clinging to their guns and religion, ya know?

The Unions have no one to blame but the morons in the mirror. If they ever thought that Bambi gave a crap about them, they were sadly mistaken.

Now if they were 90% Black unions, that'd be different...

26 posted on 11/01/2010 9:50:20 AM PDT by Regulator (Watch Out! Americans are on the March! America Forever, Mexico Never!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lbryce
A Republican-controlled House or Senate would probably block a labor-backed bill that would give firefighters and police officers in every state the right to unionize.

They better make it illegal for public employees to unionize. Neuter the dem/commie machine.

27 posted on 11/01/2010 9:53:27 AM PDT by Brett66 (Where government advances, and it advances relentlessly , freedom is imperiled -Janice Rogers Brown)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Doulos1

“Of course he was a British Jew.”

Which means what exactly?

I ask because you don’t make explicit your meaning, something here is implied, I’m curious as to what.

Are all British Jews Marxists/socialists or labor leaders?


28 posted on 11/01/2010 9:55:19 AM PDT by skepsel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

No, we will kill all union members... cook their children and eat them! /S

LLS


29 posted on 11/01/2010 9:55:50 AM PDT by LibLieSlayer (WOLVERINES!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

Just declare them to be subversive organizations (which they are) and outlaw them.


30 posted on 11/01/2010 9:56:50 AM PDT by Iron Munro (This is our culture; fight for it. This is our flag; pick it up. This is our country; take it back.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lbryce
There are now more government employee union members than private sector union members.
31 posted on 11/01/2010 9:58:27 AM PDT by dragnet2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: skinkinthegrass

Beck vs CWA, the unions hated it, part of the ruling was that the import of the decision had to be publicly posted, ie., the unions had to tell the members they could get a refund of that portion of their dues used for political purposes.

I’ve heard that as soon as Clinton took office the “Beck” notices came down and never went back up, I know it happened in my office.


32 posted on 11/01/2010 10:00:10 AM PDT by skepsel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: lbryce
...more like unions fear rollback of corruption.

Government employee unions must be eliminated.

33 posted on 11/01/2010 10:18:13 AM PDT by Zman516 (muslims, marxists, communists ---> satan's useful idiot corps)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: paulcissa; MrB
paulcissa: “Labor unions are monopolized labor and by definition should be illegal.”

Actually that's as bad as forcing someone to join a union in order to work. Both involve the heavy hand of government. Only public unions should be made illegal. Public “servants” should not be permitted to unionize against The People.

MrB wrote with much wisdom on the issue. Eliminate government/union collusion, and most of the unions will dry up on their own. Those that actually serve their employees and produce good results will survive. In a free society, what business is it of you or I to tell someone that cannot voluntarily associate with others to try and better their pay and benefits?

34 posted on 11/01/2010 10:18:16 AM PDT by CitizenUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: lbryce
Payback's a bitch, ain't it?

Mike

35 posted on 11/01/2010 10:19:49 AM PDT by MichaelP (Put a Stake in the RATS hearts November 2nd)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: skinkinthegrass

Good find.

Unfortunately, a law unenforced is about the same as no law at all :(


36 posted on 11/01/2010 10:21:00 AM PDT by reagan_fanatic (Today, Congress. Tomorrow, the White House!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Brett66

Agreed. Outlaw public unions. Private unions are destroying themselves on their own.


37 posted on 11/01/2010 10:22:12 AM PDT by SC_Pete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: skepsel

Are all British Jews Marxists/socialists or labor leaders?

I didn’t say that.
Kind of sensitive aren’t we.
Who was Moses Hess?
Who was Karl Marx?
etc.


38 posted on 11/01/2010 10:34:12 AM PDT by Doulos1 (Bitter Clinger Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: lbryce
We can only hope that the Tea Party "Radicals" rally to a repeal of the statutory "labor exemption" in the Clayton Act. The proof that Unions are in restraint of trade and harmful to economic progress lies in the present condition of Detroit.

As it stands now, so long as a union acts unilaterally and in its own interest, it is immune from claims its conduct restrains trade. This was not always the case. Before the 1914 Clayton Act and the 1932 Norris Laguardia Act, "a combination of laborers to obtain a raise in wages was itself a prohibited monopoly" under the Sherman Act.

Ascribing monopoly status to trade unions did not effectively end until Norris Laguardia - passed March 23, 1932.

If you believe, as I do, that financial markets reflect what legislation will be good for the economy and which will not provide benefit, the DJIA chart for March 1932 is revealing.

The Norris LaGuardia Act, at least in concept, had been before the Congress for a number of years. One of its primary features was to prohibit a "labor injunction." On March 7, 1932, 4 were killed when police fired on 3,000 unemployed workers marching at the Ford River Rouge plant.

Mid December through March of 1932 may be characterized as consolidation, with the DJIA trading in a stable range. The last "top" in this chart pattern is March 8. The average ten moves down to the depression bottom. The market probably knew Norris Laguardia passage was a forgone conclusion within 1 1/2 days of the River Rouge incident.

Now, 80 years later we have the wreckage the 1932 market predicted. 2010 Deitroit.

39 posted on 11/01/2010 10:42:11 AM PDT by frithguild (The Democrat Party Brand - Big Government protecting Entrenched Interests from Competition)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: melancholy

“They should be dealt with a la Reagan’s confrontation with the Air Traffic Controllers!”

EXACTLY what I was thinking. That was so cool!!


40 posted on 11/01/2010 10:43:25 AM PDT by MayflowerMadam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson