Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

(CT) Hartford and Bridgeport Polls Run Out Of Ballots
WFSB 3 News | 02 November, 2010 | LoneGOPinCT

Posted on 11/02/2010 3:51:28 PM PDT by LoneGOPinCT

Title was the report. Polling places in Hartford and Bridgeport have reported that they ran out of ballots. How does a polling place run out of ballots? Is there not a list with the number of registered voters in the district and wouldn't they have that number on hand?

The Secretary of State has instructed them to print more ballots.

Just seems odd and worthy of attention. Or am I being too cynical?


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events; US: Connecticut
KEYWORDS: 2010midterms; connecticut; ct2010; election; fraud
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

1 posted on 11/02/2010 3:51:32 PM PDT by LoneGOPinCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: LoneGOPinCT

can’t trust ‘Rats to “print more ballots” without printing extras for ballot-box stuffing


2 posted on 11/02/2010 3:53:25 PM PDT by Enchante (De-fund the "Corrupt Bastards" aka agitprop twits of NPR, PBS, and CPB now!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LoneGOPinCT

Not good. Hartford and Bridgeport are the two largest cities in Connecticut and are where most Democrap vote fraud occurs.


3 posted on 11/02/2010 3:53:25 PM PDT by MIchaelTArchangel (Obama makes me miss Jimmah Cahtah!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MIchaelTArchangel

The dead people used up the first batch of ballots, leaving none for the warm-blood residents.


4 posted on 11/02/2010 3:54:31 PM PDT by Tax-chick (I love the smell of napalm in November. Go Sharron! Go Christine!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MIchaelTArchangel

Hartford and Bport big Dem strongholds.

UGH


5 posted on 11/02/2010 3:54:58 PM PDT by Col Frank Slade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: LoneGOPinCT

I think they average the number of voters over the last few elections to determine the number of ballots. Not sure.

If they went by registered voters, they would always have a huge amount of leftover ballots.

I’ve never voted at any precinct, always voted absentee ballot.


6 posted on 11/02/2010 3:55:05 PM PDT by The Magical Mischief Tour
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LoneGOPinCT

Suspect indeed—especially with turnout apparently low in other inner-city areas across the country.


7 posted on 11/02/2010 3:55:14 PM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MIchaelTArchangel

Not good but not the end


8 posted on 11/02/2010 3:56:32 PM PDT by therightliveswithus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: All

I would be very leary of doing anything to p!zz off Vince McMahon...the guy is ruthless and very smart....


9 posted on 11/02/2010 3:57:12 PM PDT by Maverick68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: MIchaelTArchangel

I would refuse to move a foot until more ballots were secured. There is no excuse to have less ballots than eligible voters. Obviously not every eligible voter will vote but there needs to be at least a decent overshoot of ballots needed for a high turnout election model.


10 posted on 11/02/2010 3:57:12 PM PDT by torchthemummy ("About everything we do around here is government intrusion in people's lives." Ray LaHood)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: LoneGOPinCT
Over-Fraud likely at play.
11 posted on 11/02/2010 3:57:12 PM PDT by Shqipo (I stand with AZ!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LoneGOPinCT

People do mess up their ballots from time to time, and have to request a new one. But that should get recorded.


12 posted on 11/02/2010 3:57:13 PM PDT by The_Victor (If all I want is a warm feeling, I should just wet my pants.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

make that “leery”...


13 posted on 11/02/2010 3:57:45 PM PDT by Maverick68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: The Magical Mischief Tour
If they went by registered voters, they would always have a huge amount of leftover ballots.

I would think they'd print enough to cover each registered voter.

14 posted on 11/02/2010 3:58:59 PM PDT by Road Warrior 04 (I miss President Bush greatly! Palin in 2012! 2012 - The End Of An Error! (Oathkeeper))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: LoneGOPinCT

Someone get over there and verify the “long” lines and crowds of people that require the printing of more ballots. Video...


15 posted on 11/02/2010 4:00:41 PM PDT by myself6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LoneGOPinCT
Not good. Usually they print enough for each registered voter, then a margin more to account for spoiled ballots and shipping error.

If they "ran out" it frequently means, I mean it could mean, that ten or twenty thousand got diverted to some other location (where there are three hundred #2 pencils filling in ovals as we speak).

16 posted on 11/02/2010 4:00:55 PM PDT by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LoneGOPinCT

Knowing the makeup of those cities it does sound odd.


17 posted on 11/02/2010 4:04:46 PM PDT by wiggen (The teacher card. When the racism card just won't work.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Shqipo

Those precincts should be forced to subject themselves to investigation. Force them to mail everyone who voted an acknowledgment. When households with two registered voters receive 5 confirmations, 3 for people they never heard of, you can gauge the amount of ‘phantom’ voting.

Make them an example, put officials AND voters in jail, and keep doing it to suspect precincts until the rats are AFRAID to commit fraud.


18 posted on 11/02/2010 4:06:12 PM PDT by txhurl (If we can shake Congress like a can of pennies, we can uproot voter fraud like a D-9.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: LoneGOPinCT; All
www.wickedlocal.com/.../x1928788601/​Marlborough-clerk-calls-extra-ballots-wasteful From another Northeast town.
19 posted on 11/02/2010 4:06:20 PM PDT by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LoneGOPinCT

This is BS. Earlier today the reports were higher than normal turnout in traditional Republican areas and lower than normal turnout in the Democratic areas. Local TV showed Bridgeport polling locations and it was nearly empty.

I vote in the same polling location as Blumenthal and Foley and this was the first time there was a line. It took 20 minutes which is usually a quick in n out. One thing they were doing was counting the number of voters against the number of ballots every hour. If the voters done show up, they can be running out of ballots.

So this story from the CT Democratic Secretary of State is bogus on its face. It sounds to me like a Soros operation like they had in Ohio last time.


20 posted on 11/02/2010 4:06:56 PM PDT by tomd2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson