Posted on 11/02/2010 8:27:13 PM PDT by OneVike
Hey Karl, how many of those you endorsed won? Now, how many that Sarah Palin, the one you dissed, endorsed won? So who is the real loser Karl? (And the cry goes out, “Karl, Karl Karl”)Hey Karl, isn’t there a bathroom that needs cleaning?
Karl Rove and John Cornyn...both let their masks drop in the lead up to this election.
??
Is Rove your boyfriend or something?
Hannity? Is that you?
I agree, 100%.
And if you look back, you can see plenty of it earlier.
Rove was the guy who gave us Arnold Schwarzenneger in California, and blew the Republicans’ one chance to change things there.
He was the guy who gave us Arlen Specter in Pennsylvania, which cost Rick Santorum his seat in the Senate.
I wouldn’t quarrel with him if he had supported Mike Castle over O’Donnell BEFORE the primary results. But he went out of his way to destroy her AFTER she won the primary, and AFTER she was booby-trapped by the drive-by media.
If it hadn’t been for Rove, she almost certainly would have won the race.
Sorry, he is not a smart operator. He is a selfish RINO jerk. He was a loser, who took Bush’s sweeping victory in the 2004 election and turned it into a sweeping defeat in 2006. No principles, and politically stupid to boot.
Sarah will not give him the time of day. As I said, he is politically dead.
I do have an old Down Feather pillow.
He should have kept his opinion to himself and worked for promoting the candidates chosen.
But they weren’t one of his inside hand jobs like Lame McCain which drained most of us of any energy and motivation to work the 2008 elections.
That drab Old Man and the rest of Milktoasts, who did nothing but glad hand each other and even give high praise to Fauxbama are doddering old men and I don’t see their names ever again.
The last election was suppose to be about ideas. Two parties jostling it out until the field winnowed to two candidates and their ideas.
Instead, we got a bunch of guys saying “I agree with the gentleman and blah, blah, blah”.
There wasn’t a razors width difference between any of them except who was in a bigger hurry.
If a Republican had prevailed he would have acted oh so gentlemanly and strode with their egalitarian gait, as we slowly continued the direction we were headed.
As it is, we got Barry, The Kenyan, and he did what I half expected him to do: He filled up the gas tank, slapped the go pedal to the carpet and drove us off a cliff.
Karl can go Fleck himself. His words were not in the slightest helpful and just plain arrogant.
It was as if the RNC and other country clubbers were telling the rest of us “Son, you made a choice that wasn’t what I wanted and now I am going to show you who is boss”.
I will never give to the country club ever again and if they ever pull what they did again, you can be sure I will work against their candidates that are lame and that will mean I spend money on Democrats.
But that’s my 2 cents and some immeasurable amount after taxes.
If he pushes his Rinos, they are DOA IMO. Rove can go FH.
As other have pointed out, Rove was behind some of the worst of the Bush policies along with some great strategy. The problem as that as time went on, it was more bad policies than anything else. I firmly believe it was Rove who advised W to cynically sign McCain-Feingold, and that represented for me the beginning of the downhill slide that culminated in the bailout bill.
I see Mike Castle’s name or Crist’s or that witch in Alaska name again I will personally take out a loan and contribute the maximum amount possible to their opposition and it won’t make a bit of difference to me if their opposition is a Democrat.
That will just be the way it is and I ain’t kidding one bit.
Same goes for any of their relatives.
They are done.
You are Oh so right. That is what the Rinos’s on this blog forget.
Carl attacked O’Donnell, after she won the nomination.
WHY?
WHY?
Because he lost?
He was not a real man in his loss. That is why he helped to bring her down.
Then, THEN, T%hen he attacked Sarah Palin.
I am sorry, but I will help to destroy him.
It is not very nice to want to send people to hell just because they disagree with you.
I hope this is not a general sentiment of the Tea Party.
I beg to differ. Karl Rove denounced Christine, and the RNC refused to support her. For their negligence, a “bearded communist” won.
Unlike you, and you are not alone, I call this inaction on the part of Karl Rove and the RNC, a self defeating behavior. Since to refuse to aid in the fight against a “bearded marxist,” is at the least highly irresponsible, and at the most, equivalent to aiding and abetting a marxist win a senate seat.
In the case of this race, the behavior of Karl Rove, and the RNC, is unconscionable.
Karl and his ilk just inherited the Four Winds.
How’s that for a metaphor?
I see his name and I will send money to a Democrat for the first time in my life.
A blast from the past, one of Rove’s Greatest Hits:
http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=51026
Rove’s rave
Posted: July 12, 2006
By Joseph Farah
White House political strategist Karl Rove addressed members of the National Council of La Raza in Los Angeles yesterday telling the group euphemistically described by the Dissociated Press as the nation’s largest Hispanic civil rights group, “all immigrants are real Americans.”
While it may be true that most immigrants are real Americans, it is decidedly not true that members of La Raza are.
What is La Raza?
Well, let’s see: The group sponsors and directs racist schools. It promotes the “reconquista” movement that claims the American Southwest belongs to Mexico. In fact, its very name – which translates to “the race” – exposes its agenda. How do I say this politely? These people are Mexican Nazis.
But there was Karl Rove yesterday explaining that you and me – real Americans – have permitted the debate over his boss’ deliberate decision not to enforce duly enacted immigration laws to “cloud” our judgment.
“Everything that this country is, everything that we have achieved, everything that we hold, everything that we promise, is because we are a nation of diversity, brought together by immigration, and sharing a common dream,” he claimed.
It is clearly Rove’s lust for voters – legal or not – that has clouded his own judgment.
I think if I hear this old saw about America owing everything to diversity one more time, I may gag. I may hurl. I may scream. It’s not true. In fact, immigrants – and don’t forget this – owe everything to America. We’re not great because we’re diverse. We’re great because we once subscribed to a national creed. But thanks to the likes of La Raza haters, that’s no longer true.
Furthermore, diversity is the last thing on the minds of the La Raza crowd. La Raza no more promotes diversity and tolerance than does the Ku Klux Klan.
I guess Rove forgot what La Raza’s reaction was when his boss nominated Linda Chavez to the position of secretary of labor.
The lead spokeswoman of the group protested the naming of a Hispanic woman.
“The point of having a diverse Cabinet is to have someone who represents the views of that community,” she said. “But Chavez has made a career of saying, ‘I’m opposed to what most Latinos think and want.’”
La Raza may use the word “diversity.” But the meaning of the word has been turned upside down. It doesn’t mean what the dictionary says. It means the opposite. It means conformity. It means if you’re Hispanic, you must think a certain way – or else you’re not really Hispanic. You must believe what the founders of La Raza believe – that is to say what their puppet-masters in the Ford Foundation and Rockefeller Foundation who created the organization want them to believe.
But there was Karl Rove addressing these miscreants. There he was allying himself with them against us – real Americans.
And so America has achieved the kind of diversity La Raza hopes to achieve – political conformity. Both parties – the Republicans and the Democrats – cater to this anti-American scum.
It doesn’t even matter that the group continues to oppose most Bush administration policies. La Raza likes Bush’s amnesty plan and few real Americans do. So, Karl Rove is talking to them instead of us. And the Bush administration embraces these extremists.
A case in point: It didn’t bother George W. Bush one bit that his former White House counsel and current attorney general, Alberto Gonzales, was a member of La Raza.
This is a man in a position in which he is supposed to apply the law equally and without prejudice to any individual. Yet, he belonged to a group called “The Race.” He belonged to an exclusive club, a racist organization, a band of extremists.
The reception to Rove’s speech, not surprisingly, was tepid. He got polite applause amid protests of Bush’s war in Iraq.
It wasn’t anything like the reception former Mexican President Ernesto Zedillo got when he addressed the group in 1997 and proudly affirmed “that the Mexican nation extends beyond the territory enclosed by its borders and that Mexican migrants are an important – a very important – part of this.”
Maybe Rove is looking forward to working his political magic on a bigger stage – the North American Union.
Rover is dog meat, a master baiter and a loud mouth blow hard.
We don’t need his ilk and I better not continue to get robo’s from Mutt Benedict.
Coons is a disaster. O’ Donnell would’ve sent the ultimate message to Obama Liberals. I share your frustration.
However, Rove is not as bad as you say- he is a commentator. Yes, he is wrong sometimes. But we need allies against the Liberal Soros/Obama machine.
I really don’t know. It was a serious question.
I am watching Dancing with the Stars, with my 100 year old friend.
She doesn’t care about the election and wants to spend her last days enjoying herself.
So I haven’t been able to watch another channel.
Besides, you brought up Rove and I went ballistic. So now I don’t have anything else to do but carp up that bug lover.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.