Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Senate Dems warn GOP not to block legislation
The Hill ^ | November 3, 2010 | J. Taylor Rushing

Posted on 11/03/2010 1:19:46 PM PDT by jazusamo

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 221 next last
To: jazusamo

The “Republicans” don’t really even have a simple Majority; Collins, Snowe, and Pansy Graham are on the other side on key issues. Then there’s other turn-coats who sell-out, such as McClame. Republicans will be hard-pressed to get 60 votes until 2012, AND, the damage has already been done at the USSC with Kagan and Sotomayer.....


61 posted on 11/03/2010 1:46:44 PM PDT by traditional1 ("Don't gotsta worry 'bout no mo'gage, don't gotsta worry 'bout no gas; Obama gonna take care o' me!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Ways and means MUST originate in the House so FU Reid and Turban Durbin.


62 posted on 11/03/2010 1:46:59 PM PDT by Perdogg (What Would Aqua Buddha do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ScottinVA

Where can I get one of those for my car?


63 posted on 11/03/2010 1:46:59 PM PDT by fwdude (Anita Bryant was right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

The majority of the American population just said:

THANK YOU REPUBLICANS FOR BLOCKING THE DEMOCRAT AGENDA

I certainly hope the republicans are not too stupid to see that, and continue to block it.

If Issa can’t see that then make him pencil fetcher.


64 posted on 11/03/2010 1:48:05 PM PDT by Revel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red in Blue PA
Holy SH*T...!!

I'm sure you've figured out first the FUBO, then the Charles Krauthammer, then Karl Rove :-)

But what do you get when you apply it to Harry Reid?

FUHR.

Poor Harry. He had dreams of dictatorship, but all he'll ever amount to is a FUHR.

Cheers!

65 posted on 11/03/2010 1:48:28 PM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: ScottinVA

Amen. Here’s the immediate prob for the RATS: if they don’t move immediately - within days - the IRS is already changing the tax tables for 2011 and people will see ALL the tax increases in January - too late to stop them.

Then the GOP will look great as the tax cutters, people who ‘get it’

Fine with me but people are going to be angry in January


66 posted on 11/03/2010 1:48:31 PM PDT by mwl8787
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

The constitutents who voted the new guys in want and expect no compromise on the principles for which the stand, and on the issues that motivated their vote. That means government that operates within its Constitutional limits, spends no more than it takes in, and only taxes at a level necessary to fund its legitimate functions. On those issues no compromise is acceptable. None at all.


67 posted on 11/03/2010 1:49:00 PM PDT by sourcery (Don't call them "liberals" or "progressives." The honest label is extreme anti-Constitutionalists!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
This is what the Republicans should do.


68 posted on 11/03/2010 1:49:06 PM PDT by wastedyears (The only good unemployment statistic in America is the number of unemployed Dem officials.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

>>Specifically, Schumer said the 112th Congress will “focus on the middle class like a laser,”

Then the first order of business is to pass a law defining exactly what “middle class” means. When the gubmint is promising stuff for the middle class, they mean anyone making less than $250k/yr—even millionaire retirees. When they are actually “helping” the middle class, they seem to only include people that are just barely above the poverty line.

I’m really tired of this “we help the middle class” crap from both parties that never seem to do much for the folks that work hard and actually have a little bit to show for it after the bills are paid. That includes the small business owner and the person that works for a paycheck.


69 posted on 11/03/2010 1:49:47 PM PDT by Bryanw92 (Obama is like a rocket scientist....who's trying to do brain surgery with a hammer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KarlInOhio

“Reid’s actions are similar to the Japanese emperor issuing warnings to the United States on August 10, 1945.”

Well said!


70 posted on 11/03/2010 1:49:59 PM PDT by mrsmith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: surrey

“On the other side, I fear that Scott Brown is going to tilt far to the left. After the drubbing the Republicans got here in MA., he may figure the only way to keep his seat is to play nice with the Dems.”

Fine, then let him get replaced with an actual democrat. I think we’ve shown that we’re sick of RINOs.


71 posted on 11/03/2010 1:52:15 PM PDT by bolobaby
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
Pointedly, however, Reid signaled that Democrats would likely vote against a wholesale extension of the 2001 and 2003 tax cuts signed by President George W. Bush, which expire at the end of the year. Democrats would agree to extending the cuts for middle-class families, Reid said, but allowing them for wealthy Americans “is not going to happen” because it would cost $4 trillion.

An outright lie.

The 10-year "loss of revenue" (it's not a "cost") for renewing all of the "Bush tax cuts" is $3.7 trillion. We could round that up to $4 trillion.

However, not extending those tax cuts for "the rich" (which is apparently singles making more than $200K per year, and families making more than $250K/year) would only reduce the "loss of revenue" to $3 trillion.

That means that the "the rich" only account for about $700 billion of that loss in revenue. Percentage-wise, it's about 19% of the total -- while the same "rich" pay about 28% of individual income taxes. So, they really aren't getting their "share" anyway.

72 posted on 11/03/2010 1:53:29 PM PDT by justlurking (The only remedy for a bad guy with a gun is a good WOMAN (Sgt. Kimberly Munley) with a gun)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Elections. Have. Consequences.

Learn it. Love it. Live it.


73 posted on 11/03/2010 1:53:50 PM PDT by RichInOC (No! BAD Rich! (What'd I say?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ScottinVA

I was thinking today.....I may have to change my handle.


74 posted on 11/03/2010 1:54:36 PM PDT by Red in Blue PA (Planning on using 911? Google "Brittany Zimmerman")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Harry Reid, Dick Durbin, and Charles Schumer, aII traitors, set the tone right out of the gate. GOOD......


75 posted on 11/03/2010 1:55:33 PM PDT by Gator113 (Beauty will devour the Beast in 2012. Kill "Obamamosque"@ Ground Zero)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
What doesn't he understand about a MAJOR loss for Democrats? These people still don't realize they were run over by a large truck last night.

Also, it's time for Bohner to look Obama in the eye and say ... I appreciate your point of view, we've seen plenty of it. But that's not what the American people want, and that's not the way we are going to do it. AND he should raise his voice. It is going to take some YELLING to get through Obama's ideology which he thinks makes him walk on the water. Time to give him some verbal SHOVEDS ... I wonder if John can do that?

76 posted on 11/03/2010 1:57:08 PM PDT by ThePatriotsFlag (You are just jealous because the voices aren't talking to YOU!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sourcery
The constitutents who voted the new guys in want and expect no compromise on the principles for which the stand

Well said and exactly right. The Senate and House Repubs had better not fold on any of the issues that enabled this message to be sent to Zer0 and the RATS.

77 posted on 11/03/2010 1:57:12 PM PDT by jazusamo (His [Obama's] political base---the young, the left and the thoughtless: Thomas Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Clump
I hope the house really kicks them in the freaking head

Literally and figuratively.

78 posted on 11/03/2010 1:57:17 PM PDT by Michael Barnes (Guilty of being White.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Well, the House is certainly going to be a bigger issue than RINOs in the senate.


79 posted on 11/03/2010 1:58:08 PM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: andy58-in-nh
No love lost:

Notice, however, that it's *her* finger which is bitten off.

Cheers!

80 posted on 11/03/2010 1:58:50 PM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 221 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson