Heads should roll on this muzzie getting advanced..
They're prepared now.
“Few GI’s tried to stop him”
‘cause GI’s can’t be trusted to wear their side arms when on base according to the liberals that forced the arms ban.... go figure.
I read that US Soldiers are disarmed, unless they are literally engaged at the front. Is this true?
This is mind-boggling.
If you are not a guard that is on duty at Ft. Hood, then you are not allowed to carry a firearm. It’s a gun-free zone. How were they supposed to fight back?
What were they supposed to use against the crazed Jihadi gunman-—harsh language?
They weren’t armed!!! Had they been, they’d have cut down Hassan in a flash.
Early reports said that an armed GI looking for the shooter was mistaken for the shooter and shot dead. Was there any truth to friendly fire?
Well our government did nothing to stop him either. He should never been in our military in the first place but multiculturalism and Marxism rules our government.
A doctrine fostered by a delusional, illogical liberal minority, and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end.
Actually, no, he was not "one of them". He was a muslim whose values and worldview are completely in opposition to the beliefs of Americans and Christians.
I guess if you are an athiest writer in New York this is a complicated concept to parse. For those of us in flyover country it is not.
The headline writer should be fired. The “reporters” should be fired. Either give us the facts, all the facts, or don’t write the article. After reading through the comments here, and reading the article itself, it becomes apparent that this “news”paper and its writers/editors need to attend a different journalism school. WHERE IS THE TRUTH?
(please don’t respond....I’m just ranting!)