Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

USN&WR: December issue will be last printed monthly sent to subscribers (Dinosaur Media DeathWatch™)
Poynter Online ^ | November 5, 2010 | Brian Kelley

Posted on 11/05/2010 1:55:45 PM PDT by abb

From: Kelly, Brian To: INSIDE Sent: Fri Nov 05 15:31:30 2010 Subject: Digital Strategy

To: U.S. News From: Bill and Brian RE: Completing Our Shift to the Digital World

Colleagues, We're finally ready to complete our transition to a predominantly digital publishing model with selected, single-topic print issues. This will allow us to make the most of the proven products, useful journalism, and great audience growth we've been sustaining. Thanks to all your great work, we've been able to maintain our core values of creating high-quality content while establishing a new, healthy business model. This puts us in a strong position to continue building the U.S. News brand in the new media world. As you know, we've been a leading innovator in adapting to the changing environment -- and we don't intend to give up that lead.

The December issue will be our last print monthly sent to subscribers, whose remaining print and digital replica subscriptions will be filled by other publishers. Going forward, our non-subscription print offerings will be for newsstand sale and targeted distribution. They'll include the college and grad guides, as well as hospital and personal finance guides. In addition, we’ll publish four other newsstand special editions, focusing on history, religion and some of the other subjects that have been a success for us in the past. And of course we’ll continue to expand our audience and products on the various usnews.com channels and grow the digital U.S. News Weekly.

All of us at U.S. News Media Group have been aggressively responding to the changing habits in the media marketplace, and these latest moves will accelerate our ability to grow our online businesses and position ourselves to take advantage of the emerging platforms for distributing information such as the iPad and Android tablets. We'll discuss this in more detail in meetings starting next week.

With an average unique audience of 9 million and counting, we've become a significant publisher in the digital space, creating content that people want and an audience that advertisers will pay for. Each of our channels -- Politics & Policy, Education, Money, Health, Autos, and Travel -- are now fully-formed business units that are developing on their own best course. By working both in the vertical channels and horizontally across them, the company has diversified its revenue beyond display advertising to include e-commerce products, lead generation, licensing and other sources.

Our emphasis on rankings and research content is the right path, making us an essential information source in a commoditized marketplace. We provide information that helps people make important decisions. Whether they're picking a college or voting for a senator, it's clear from the response of our users that accurate, searchable information is something they value highly. The proof is in the audience. People come to us every day, all day, for information they can’t get anywhere else.

We can't sit still. We have to keep improving the existing products while selectively creating new ones. In addition to upgrades in college and hospital rankings, we’ll refine and expand the data and tools that allow consumers to evaluate mutual funds, high schools, cars, online education, health plans and more. Travel is getting ready to come out of beta. Politics & Policy is developing its extensive database allowing citizens to examine the records of every member of Congress and is part of an expanding group of public policy tools. The iPad and the next generations of tablets and mobile platforms will create a brand new set of opportunities for us. We know that the creative energy and team spirit of everyone at U.S. News will continue to keep us ahead of the pack.

Bill and Brian


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: advertising; circulation; dbm; magazines
Friday afternoon good news.
1 posted on 11/05/2010 1:55:52 PM PDT by abb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: abb

whoop de doo

What is that, 3 copies or so?


2 posted on 11/05/2010 1:56:42 PM PDT by gthog61
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abb

You just beat me. I even had (Dinosaur Media DeathWatch™) in parentheses at the top. LOL. But my internet connection hiccuped.


3 posted on 11/05/2010 1:58:33 PM PDT by library user
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 04-Bravo; 1cewolf; aimhigh; andyandval; Arizona Carolyn; Bahbah; bert; bilhosty; Caipirabob; ...

ping


4 posted on 11/05/2010 1:58:38 PM PDT by abb ("What ISN'T in the news is often more important than what IS." Ed Biersmith, 1942 -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abb

Good riddance to another liberal rag.


5 posted on 11/05/2010 2:01:33 PM PDT by Parley Baer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abb

Good riddance U.S. Snooze & Slurred Reports!


6 posted on 11/05/2010 2:01:33 PM PDT by VanDeKoik (1 million in stimulus dollars paid for this tagline!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abb

What happens if you have a subscription to the print magazine?


7 posted on 11/05/2010 2:02:41 PM PDT by smokingfrog (Because you don't live near a bakery doesn't mean you have to go without cheesecake.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gthog61

8 posted on 11/05/2010 2:04:12 PM PDT by SandRat (Duty, Honor, Country! What else needs said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: abb

lol.

They are trying to sugar coat it big time.


9 posted on 11/05/2010 2:04:17 PM PDT by GeronL (http://libertyfic.proboards.com <--- My Fiction/ Science Fiction Board)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

Lipstick on a pig.


10 posted on 11/05/2010 2:07:59 PM PDT by webheart (I am a Sarah fan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: gthog61
People forget that even until the late 1970’s, USN&WR actually supplied a news balance among the mainstream weeklies. Then they decided to compete for the same shrinking market of ignoramuses as time, Newsweek and other also-rans.
11 posted on 11/05/2010 2:08:46 PM PDT by Vigilanteman (Obama: Fake black man. Fake Messiah. Fake American. How many fakes can you fit in one Zer0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: smokingfrog
What happens if you have a subscription to the print magazine?

Six months of TV Guide as a replacement?

12 posted on 11/05/2010 2:12:19 PM PDT by abb ("What ISN'T in the news is often more important than what IS." Ed Biersmith, 1942 -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: abb

USN&WR is probably the best of the newsweeklies but also has the lowest circulation.


13 posted on 11/05/2010 2:19:45 PM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks (Impeachment !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks

At one time - forty to fifty years ago - it was actually conservative. It was my first subscription as an adolescent news junkie back in 1962.


14 posted on 11/05/2010 2:24:40 PM PDT by abb ("What ISN'T in the news is often more important than what IS." Ed Biersmith, 1942 -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: abb

I cancelled when David Rodham Gergen joined the Clinton Administration and turned lib.


15 posted on 11/05/2010 2:34:54 PM PDT by Montanabound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abb

I remember my dad, a Goldwater supporter, receiving it every week...it was indeed more balanced than the other ywo.


16 posted on 11/05/2010 2:37:38 PM PDT by dogcaller
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: abb


17 posted on 11/05/2010 2:53:29 PM PDT by Chode (American Hedonist - *DTOM* -ww- NO Pity for the LAZY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks; abb
USN&WR is probably the best of the newsweeklies

That's sort of like saying your city landfill smells better than its sewage treatment plant.

Not much of a compliment, IMHO.

18 posted on 11/05/2010 3:26:44 PM PDT by Zakeet (Like the wise Wee Wee said, "We can't be broke ... we still have checks in the checkbook.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: abb

It appears that though major systems are shutting down, there is hope that dialysis will reverse the kidney failure and life can resume.


19 posted on 11/05/2010 3:37:53 PM PDT by bert (K.E. N.P. N.C. +12 ..... Greetings Jacques. The revolution is coming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bert; abb
I didn't realize they were still printing. Their founder, the late, great, David Lawrence, likely would be glad to see it go, considering what has happened to it.
20 posted on 11/05/2010 4:06:23 PM PDT by Lucius Cornelius Sulla ('“Our own government has become our enemy' - Sheriff Paul Babeu)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

Now that’s funny! Can I steal it?


21 posted on 11/05/2010 4:33:24 PM PDT by ops33 (Senior Master Sergeant, USAF (Retired))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: abb

I took US News into the early 80s, then it seemed to get away from my outlook.
Maybe I moved away from US News...


22 posted on 11/05/2010 4:46:37 PM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks (Impeachment !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: abb
At one time - forty to fifty years ago - it was actually conservative. It was my first subscription as an adolescent news junkie back in 1962.

I remember it in the '60s when, yes, it was conservative.

23 posted on 11/05/2010 4:49:25 PM PDT by sionnsar (IranAzadi|5yst3m 0wn3d-it's N0t Y0ur5:SONY|TV--it's NOT news you can trust)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: abb

thanks for the ping


24 posted on 11/06/2010 11:28:20 AM PDT by GOPJ ('Power abdicates only under the stress of counter-power." Martin Buber /a Tea-nami's coming..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: bert; Zakeet; GeronL; Milhous; conservatism_IS_compassion

http://gannettblog.blogspot.com/2010/11/week-nov-1-7-your-layoff-comments-part_06.html#comments

Anonymous said...

11:26 a.m. -

The problem is more advertising than it is quality of the product. Advertisers that once flocked to newspapers in spite of the quality are now choosing to sound their ad budgets in other places in spite of quality. I left Gannett a couple of years ago and am now in PR. Our firm was recently marketing a new service to Gannett community and we had $20k in advertising money. That amount is not small but It wasn’t huge either. We had to make some difficult and calculated decisions about where we were going to spend the budget and get the biggest bang for our buck, to be cliche. We cast a wide net and spent the money in a number of places, including the Gannett newspaper, Facebook, digital platforms, etc. The campaign was largely a success, but when we asked people where they learned of our service, not a single person said the newspaper. Facebook and Google ads were 100 times more effective and cost us considerably less. Why were they were more effective? Targeted audiences. The way those software programs target your ad buy to a very specific group of people who have the highest likelihood of engaging your product or service is more valuable than any news content, no matter the quality. The next time our firm has $20k to spend, I can assure you we will spend every penny we put into the newspaper this time around expanding our online approach through search engines and social media targeted advertising. Multiply that statement by 1 million times and you can begin to understand why newspapers are losing revenue. The quality of the content has nothing to do with loss of advertising. It’s unfortunate too, as a former journalist and a newspaperman at heart, it makes me sad to know that is the case. Good luck everyone. It’s hard to watch these layoffs come to good newsrooms, even if i am no longer a part of one.


25 posted on 11/06/2010 3:00:20 PM PDT by abb ("What ISN'T in the news is often more important than what IS." Ed Biersmith, 1942 -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: abb

bump


26 posted on 11/06/2010 3:34:13 PM PDT by GeronL (http://libertyfic.proboards.com <--- My Fiction/ Science Fiction Board)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

We here at the Dinosaur Media DeathWatch™ group have been saying for years that the interweb thingy is a much more ‘efficient’ device for delivering advertising than any communications system yet devised by mankind.

Now the folks at Gannett have finally figured it out.


27 posted on 11/06/2010 3:42:53 PM PDT by abb ("What ISN'T in the news is often more important than what IS." Ed Biersmith, 1942 -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: abb

hopefully too late


28 posted on 11/06/2010 4:20:02 PM PDT by GeronL (http://libertyfic.proboards.com <--- My Fiction/ Science Fiction Board)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson