Every time I reread it I see more how much the whole thing drips with whining by political hacks and “press” people about how they just weren’t listened to or respected.
If the campaign was surrounded by people like this, that’s almost certainly one of the major reasons Sharron lost.
The writer purports to be writing about a failure of “logistics,” but in fact every part of it reeks of the sort of “strategizing” that takes place in hotel watering holes.
Once again, please point out SPECIFICS that you disagree with - all you are doing is making the same kind of whiny commentary that you accuse the author of doing.