Skip to comments.Cool It: The Anti-Scarefest Documentary of the Year
Posted on 11/12/2010 7:14:38 AM PST by Kaslin
Bjorn Lomborg, the self-described "skeptical environmentalist," is so likable and empowered by common sense in this new film that he could be the Ronald Reagan of climate science.
You cant say An Inconvenient Truth wasnt a monumental film. It did exactly what it was supposed to do — it terrified vast numbers of people into favoring irrational behavior. It is correct to compare the Al Gore eco-alarmism film with the most notorious propaganda movies ever made.
But … somewhere along the line, as Al Gore stood chuckling offstage like the Joker, expecting to profit hugely through his greentech venture-capital investments as panic ruled public life, some kind of rationality inexplicably prevailed. As in The Dark Knight ferry scene, neither side blew up the other. By the time West Virginias new Senator-elect Joe Manchin made the formidable case that the only way to deal with cap-and-trade regulation was to shoot it (and this was a Democrat talking), calm had already carried the day. The United States, it is now firmly established, will deal with global warming in a non-hysterical way. The Joker is looking uncharacteristically glum these days.
The spokesman for the new approach is Bjorn Lomborg, a blond, bike-loving, affable Swedish academic and author whose op-eds frequently appear in the Wall Street Journal and whose pleasingly chill vibe provides the mood and the title for the exciting new global warming documentary Cool It. So sensible are Lomborgs ideas for cooling the planet without destroying our economic competitiveness that even the Los Angeles Times dubbed it “enlightening,brain-nourishing stuff.
It simply is not possible to decarbonize Western economies anytime soon, and cap-and-tax plans would have such a ridiculously small effect on global climate patterns, at such massive cost, that Lomborg, in his charming way, treats them as the childish ideas they are. (In one especially memorable scene, British kids are interviewed about the prospects for the planet: seemingly all of them have been coached to believe that a flame-broiled apocalypse is imminent. Another comic interlude, featuring bubble-headed celebrities delivering climate-science verdicts from red carpets, captures actors telling us we should all switch our light bulbs because every little bit helps. No it doesn’t, replies Lomborg. Such actions are meaningless against the size of the climate issues.)
Lomborg, visiting poor African kids in Kenya, points out that if global warming is likely to lead to a three percent rise in malaria cases, it would be smarter to directly attack the other 97 percent than to remove a smokestack in Pittsburgh in hopes that it would eventually lead to less malarial infection thousands of miles away. He visits with scientists working on clever solutions that would actually absorb solar radiation, such as cloud whitening and using sulfur dioxide above the atmosphere to imitate the cooling effects of a massive volcanic eruption. Meanwhile, checking in on such popular, highly subsidized ideas as purchasing carbon offsets, Lomborg finds them to be corrupt and nonsensical. A company might find itself wallowing in profits simply for threatening to build dirty-energy plants — then not building them. Encouraging such extortion as a national policy is madness.
Speaking of which, Lomborg shows that, notwithstanding Al Gore’s warnings of ocean levels increasing 20 feet and swamping coastal cities, scientists expect the level of rise to be more like a foot — which is about what it was in the previous century. Does anyone rank that level of increase as one of the more alarming events of the past 100 years? More to the point, Lomborg asks: did anyone except specialists even notice?
If you scare people to try to motivate them, Lomborg adds, over time they turn off. He sees this as a dangerous trend. Global warming is real and it’s an important problem, he judges — but keeping a level head can lead to surprisingly simple solutions. For instance, if you’re among the Gore faithful who believe that Hurricane Katrina was caused by global warming, how optimistic can you be about the future of the Gulf Coast? Even if your fondest dreams for cap and trade should come true, the warming trends are likely to continue. But Lomborg visits the Netherlands, which like New Orleans must deal with the problem of cities being built below sea level, and illustrates how a system of seawalls that can be open and closed depending on weather conditions has kept Dutch feet dry for many years. Lomborg declares forthrightly that Katrina was a man-made catastrophe caused by badly engineered levies and a general failure of preparation.
You can see how Lomborg’s film, directed by Ondi Timoner, is the anti-scarefest of the year. It considers a problem, outlines solutions, and looks forward to a bright future in which dynamic economies continue to create wealth while phalanxes of scientists discover surprising new ways (such as wave energy and artificial photosynthesis) to power the planet and subtract carbon from the atmosphere. So non-scary is this film, in fact, that it terrifies statist liberals who are already howling in despair at the idea that the West need not move everybody out of SUVs and into Schwinns. Are we all doomed, just as the liberals warned we were when they told us a new ice age was dawning in the 1970s? Not by a long shot. Bjorn Lomborg is so sunny, likable, and empowered by common sense that he could be the Ronald Reagan of climate science.
Lomborg may not be so gibberingly insane as Gore, but he still believes in AGW.
I won’t be watching his “common-sense” film.
An Inconvenient Truth = Triumph of the Swill........
Still not buying the whole idea that the globe is warming, but whatever works.
He’s a loon, just not as looney as that loon Algore.
Although this may be more rational than Algore’s special effects extravaganza, it still seems to accept that humans are somehow heating up the planet.
The Earth has always cycled between phases of global cooling and warming. It’s silly and dangerous to try to alter that cycle. Life will adapt to whichever part of the cycle we are in, it always has.
A line worthy of Charles!
(One of the best compliments I give, BTW.)
Send DVDs to every college student in the US. And every high school senior.
Only to an insignificant extent. If we had perfect intrumentation to one-thousandth of a degree, it would not surprise me to find that there was some small change due to human activity.
Land masses are not static, they are in constant movement.
Oh well that's just awesome! Lets dump sulfur dioxide into the atmosphere and cause acid rain. Replace a make believe problem with a real problem. Brilliant.
“Cool It” is a terrific movie for intelligent audiences. Neatly dispels the gibberish of Gore’s crockumentary.
The problem with global warming is primarily that the Left assigns the blame to humans. In their view, people are the root of problems. It can never be a natural phenomena.
There are many examples to prove that warming is a natural fluxuation. First, is the Neanderthals leaving northern Europe during the Ice Age. But my personal favorite is Peru’s Moche civilization. The archaeologists found evidence of long periods of rain. This was supported by the scientists doing research in the Andes who showed that ancient Peru experienced years of percipitation and years of drought. This was many, many years prior to industrialization anywhere on the planet.
Anybody remember what Al’s first scam was? Here’s a few clues: it was in the 1970s, on the cover of Time magazine. Answer: Global Ice Age. I rest my case.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.