Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Senate president wants 17th Amendment repealed
The Times-Tribune ^ | November 12, 2010 | The Associated Press

Posted on 11/12/2010 8:31:29 PM PST by Tolerance Sucks Rocks

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 last
To: The Comedian

“It’s a great idea, but irrelevant and impossible, bordering on feint and strawman.”

This may be true, but we must also be true and frank about the defect introduced to our constitution as illustrated by their effect on our history and the logical conflict of interest they make.


61 posted on 11/13/2010 1:23:19 PM PST by Monorprise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: RichInOC

“Seeing the California Lege in action...I’d prefer to make it unrepealable.”

The Califorina Legislator would nominate democrat senators but them senators would not be inclined to take power away from the Califorina legislator and towards Washington D.C.

You must remember that.


62 posted on 11/13/2010 1:30:07 PM PST by Monorprise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Monorprise
This may be true, but we must also be true and frank about the defect introduced to our constitution as illustrated by their effect on our history and the logical conflict of interest they make.

Totally agree. I just don't want any Congressmen or any of our people wasting time on the issue. It isn't fixable until we have unassailable control of all 3 branches.


Frowning takes 68 muscles.
Smiling takes 6.
Pulling this trigger takes 2.
I'm lazy.

63 posted on 11/13/2010 1:31:42 PM PST by The Comedian (I enjoy progressives, especially in a light cream sauce.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Kegger; fieldmarshaldj

fieldmarshaldj has a dissenting opinion at #17, I need to re-look at the history. Right now I’m not sure which is better, we seem to be in a bad place now with respect to the power of the senate and how people pick “the senate” as “a career”, but it may have been worse before A17 passed.


64 posted on 11/13/2010 4:05:21 PM PST by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: The Comedian

Actually on this matter we merely need control of 2/3rd of the state legislators or 2/3rds of both houses of congress.

Once we repose such an amendment getting it ratified is simply a matter of time. I say this because of the corrupt way the court and house has interpreted the ratification process.

According to the Federal Government can only ratify in the positive or not, they cannot withdraw their ratification and a constitutional amendment remains out there for ratification indefinably.

So once such an amendment has been proposed we can take our time in a state by state campaign to get it thou. Eventually we will get a majority in 38 different states, although not necessarily at the same time.

The best part is if the Feds try to arbitrarily change the rules on this exploit we can nully the 14th amendment under their new rules lol.


65 posted on 11/13/2010 6:55:53 PM PST by Monorprise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

This has been a long-running Freeper goal. I hope it gains traction. Then repeal the 16th Amendment, too.


66 posted on 11/14/2010 9:19:27 PM PST by monkeyshine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson