Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 11/15/2010 8:31:56 AM PST by WebFocus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: WebFocus

Gosh looks like California isn’t the only place with ‘stupid’ republicans.


2 posted on 11/15/2010 8:34:39 AM PST by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: WebFocus

Can the Secretary of State in Ct call for an audit. It seems as though Dem votes showed up last minute, who’s to say many Republican votes disappeared?
Rigged machines?....I’m just saying....


3 posted on 11/15/2010 8:35:19 AM PST by oust the louse (When you subsidize poverty and failure, you get more of both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: WebFocus

CT voters were waiting in line to vote on 11/2, we could not wait and I guarantee the motivation was with the “take our government back” message not keep spending and kill us. No way, even in Bridgeport, that Republicans were a no show, it’s just not possible!


4 posted on 11/15/2010 8:35:58 AM PST by GizzyGirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: WebFocus
These types of articles are more than I can stand. Honestly, they absolutely set my teeth on edge.

I pray the influence of the TEA Parties will soon bring an end to election fraud.

6 posted on 11/15/2010 8:38:20 AM PST by wintertime (Re: Obama, Rush Limbaugh said, "He was born here." ( So? Where's the proof?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: WebFocus

The Connecticut Post has been a primary apologist for all that reeks in Bridgeport. The way they’ve presented the election mess as ‘reporting’ was part of the script we’re all supposed to be playing along with for the priviledge of living nearby (safely, so far) the rats nest. USA out of Bridgeport now.


7 posted on 11/15/2010 8:38:20 AM PST by BillyBonebrake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: WebFocus
The trick of 'finding' uncounted dem votes in the bathroom wastebin is getting old.
Instead they make the rep votes disappear.

9 posted on 11/15/2010 8:45:29 AM PST by BitWielder1 (Corporate Profits are better than Government Waste)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: WebFocus

I trust the remnants of the Connecticut Republican party will look into this.


10 posted on 11/15/2010 8:48:45 AM PST by NonValueAdded (Palin 2012: don't retreat, just reload)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: WebFocus
"Lost" my donkey. They were erased.


Frowning takes 68 muscles.
Smiling takes 6.
Pulling this trigger takes 2.
I'm lazy.

11 posted on 11/15/2010 8:49:42 AM PST by The Comedian (I enjoy progressives, especially in a light cream sauce.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GizzyGirl; wintertime; madinmadtown

The author, Raymond, is doing a superficial job on reviewing the results. All previous GOV elections in CT since the close one in ‘94 have been GOP landslides for an incumbent.

Foley got the base GOP vote which other non-GOV non-incumbent candidates have been getting. It is likely that there was fraud in the numbers, but we don’t know that from looking at the results. The Bridgeport numbers at least “look plausible.” In ‘06, the 2 GOP state Senate candidates received 4700 votes. And one of them was a Bridgeport resident and incumbent (Russo).

A thorough audit of results in New Haven, Hartford, Meriden, Bprt would be called for. But if the extra 5000 votes are fake, they were spread around the state, not concentrated in Bprt.


13 posted on 11/15/2010 9:23:22 AM PST by campaignPete R-CT ("pray without ceasing" - Paul of Tarsus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: WebFocus
Sounds like we got whole lotta corruption going on up dere - Fritz Hollings
14 posted on 11/15/2010 9:34:34 AM PST by McGruff (A political party cannot be all things to all people. It must represent certain fundamental beliefs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: WebFocus
Where did all the Republican votes go in Bridgeport, Connecticut?

Anybody check Burr Creek?

15 posted on 11/15/2010 9:35:33 AM PST by MAexile (Bats left, votes right)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: WebFocus

“This undoubtedly is due in part to the influx of social justice organizations, which seem to spread poverty, slums, and welfare dependency wherever they set up shop. Detroit is a textbook example of the desperate plight these community agitators cause when they gain political power and rip to shreds the industrial and economic base of the community.”

This sums up the Obama Administration, and what it is doing to America, better than anything I have ever seen.


17 posted on 11/15/2010 12:35:30 PM PST by LeonardFMason
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: WebFocus

This always happens, it seems. I looked up the salaries of the state “workers” who are paid to enforce CT election laws they make over $60K apiece PER YEAR. They should all be FIRED!


18 posted on 11/15/2010 1:21:06 PM PST by LurkedLongEnough
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: WebFocus
Hmmm..Three weeks left before I plunge into the CT in-laws "den-of-vipers" for the annual Christmas party...

Struggling to figure out how to top last year's instigated (by me) confrontations. So far all I've come up with is the 15 posters I've printed of "Driving Miss Sara" to put up all around the banquet room...

19 posted on 11/15/2010 2:43:23 PM PST by SuperLuminal (Where is another agitator for republicanism like Sam Adams when we need him?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: WebFocus
And now this

Bridgeport Rejects Ballot Recount

Ken Dixon, Staff Writer

Published: 11:14 a.m., Tuesday, November 16, 2010
HARTFORD -- Bridgeport officials, citing a lack of authority for Secretary of the State Susan Bysiewicz, have rejected a request to recount ballots in the 12 city voting precincts that were kept open an extra two hours on Election Day.

Bysiewicz's office said Arthur C. Laske III, deputy city attorney, called Monday afternoon to announce that the city would not be redoing the count that they originally performed in the days after the Nov. 2 election.

Laske's call occurred hours after a Bysiewicz news conference announcing that Bridgeport's voting registrars agreed to perform an additional review of the ballots as part of a routine statewide recount of totals in 74 polling precincts.

http://www.ctpost.com/news/article/Bridgeport-rejects-ballot-recount-815152.php

20 posted on 11/16/2010 10:24:13 AM PST by leadpencil1 (jam as often as you can)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson