Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rangel: 'I have no real chance of fighting back'
The Hill ^

Posted on 11/15/2010 1:47:44 PM PST by Sub-Driver

Rangel: 'I have no real chance of fighting back' By Jordan Fabian - 11/15/10 03:51 PM ET

Embattled Rep. Charles Rangel (D-N.Y.) struck a defeated tone Monday, hours after he walked out of his own ethics trial.

Rangel reiterated his claim that his due process rights had been violated over his lack of legal representation at the trial that began Monday morning.

"I hope that my colleagues in Congress, friends, constituents and anyone paying attention will consider my statement and how the committee has been unfair to me," he said in a prepared statement. "They can do what they will with me because they have the power and I have no real chance of fighting back."

The longtime lawmaker made waves when he threatened to leave the hearing after tussling with ethics committee chairwoman Zoe Lofgren (D-Calif.) over the absence of his legal representation.

Rangel's attorneys parted ways with him in October, and the congressman said he could not afford to hire new representation after spending almost $2 million in legal fees over the past two years.

The adjudicatory subcommittee is meeting behind closed doors Monday afternoon to determine if Rangel committed the 13 counts of House ethics violations that are alleged against him.

If he is found guilty of the violations, he could face a full House vote on his expulsion or a lesser punishment. Rangel said he is now looking past the trial.

"Now, I am going forward — not backwards — to do the job I was elected to do. That is to serve my district and to serve my country, as I have tried to do for the past 50 years," he said. "In the end, I hope that I would be judged by my entire record that determines that I have been a credit to the House and to my family, friend and supporters who have entrusted me with this honorable duty."


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; Government
KEYWORDS: charlesrangel; charlierangel; cultureofcorruption; newyork; racecard; rangel; victimology
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-87 next last
To: listenhillary
What exactly did he get from the lawyers for 2 million?

He probably got the beginnings of some excellent representation, but my suspicion is that they "walked" because he racked up an unpaid $2,000,000.00 bill with them.

I don't believe for a second that crooked Charlie paid anyone a plugged nickel to defend him.

41 posted on 11/15/2010 2:51:38 PM PST by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

A couple of questions (and please forgive my gross naiveté):

1. I am assuming Mr. Rangel has documentation and records that, if accurate, should easily and readily counter these charges. Why $2,000,000 in legal fees to turn over papers that prove your innocence?

2. Why does Mr. Rangel think that it is the responsibility of his constituents to pay for his legal services, especially if he enjoyed undue or illegal gain because of his actions?


42 posted on 11/15/2010 3:00:00 PM PST by cliniclinical (space for rent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

It’s not fair that I’m guilty guilty guilty.


43 posted on 11/15/2010 3:04:15 PM PST by dr_who
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
Rangel: 'I have no real chance of fighting back'

Go ahead and play the victim, you corrupt, fat, lying, oppressive jerk.

44 posted on 11/15/2010 3:05:14 PM PST by TheThinker (Communists: taking over the world one kooky doomsday scenario at a time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: South40
Traficant went to jail for much less than what Rangal has committed. And what's the difference between the two, besides the awful toupee?
45 posted on 11/15/2010 3:07:48 PM PST by TheThinker (Communists: taking over the world one kooky doomsday scenario at a time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
With flair and flourishes, Rangel will likely plop a big race card on the table....and that nit-wit Waters will echo that scream. Members of the Black Caucus will likely follow suit. I can't take that crowd seriously any more. They are beyond rehabilitation.
46 posted on 11/15/2010 3:33:51 PM PST by AlphaOneAlpha
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
Rangel: 'I have no real chance of fighting back'

When Rangel was stealing from Americans with no chance to fight back, that was fine.

Now it's our turn.

47 posted on 11/15/2010 3:40:15 PM PST by RJL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
Photobucket
48 posted on 11/15/2010 3:51:14 PM PST by mojitojoe (In itÂ’s 1600 years of existence, Islam has 2 main accomplishments, psychotic violence and goat curr)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: listenhillary

He’s probably lying about spending millions on lawyers. Prove it Charlie. Prove how much money you spent. Why should we believe anything you say?

Lying, holier than thou, do gooder, hypocrite!


49 posted on 11/15/2010 3:55:32 PM PST by Hound of the Baskervilles ("Nonsense in the intellect draws evil after it." C.S. Lewis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Wings-n-Wind
Time to send this racketeering thief down the river!

Sorry Charlie... ( Ummm... NOT!)

--------------------------

Waters and Rangel - 09-28-10_sm

50 posted on 11/15/2010 3:57:01 PM PST by BobP (The piss-stream media - Never to be watched again in my house)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Ah’m just a poor ol broken down black man. Nobody knows da troubles ah’ve seen. Nobody knows but Jesus. Swing lowwwwww, sweet chariot, coming for to take me hoommmmmmeeeeee.


51 posted on 11/15/2010 4:06:21 PM PST by Dewey Revoltnow (Worst. Community. Agitator. Ever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Americanexpat
Didn’t he just spend $60 million of his own money on his election. Looks like he should have saved some for his court costs.

Why would he even have to spend a dime on re-election. He represents a gerrymandered district called Harlem. He's always shoe-in cuz he can stick it to da man.
52 posted on 11/15/2010 4:10:28 PM PST by Dewey Revoltnow (Worst. Community. Agitator. Ever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
Rangel: 'I have no real chance of fighting back'

That's probably true when you're caught red-handed.

53 posted on 11/15/2010 4:27:24 PM PST by luvbach1 (Stop Barry now. He can't help himself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

I hope they throw the book at this bum. He has had plenty of time to get representation. I guess he has had time to hide his money by now. Let him sell the property he evaded paying taxes on.

Earlier he was beyond arrogant. Now he is whining. I guess his crooked buddies finally told him that he is too hot to handle.

I will never forget when he told blacks in New Orleans that the Republicans wanted to put them back in slavery. To my eternal disgust some of them were stupid enough to believe him. I would give him ten years just for doing that.


54 posted on 11/15/2010 4:38:30 PM PST by SkipW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

“I hope that my colleagues in Congress, friends, constituents and anyone paying attention will consider my statement and how the committee has been unfair to me,” he said in a prepared statement. “They can do what they will with me because they have the power and I have no real chance of fighting back.”

Oh, boo hoo. Once a victim, always a victim. I’m sick and tired of it. Enuff Charlie Brown.


55 posted on 11/15/2010 4:53:48 PM PST by SeattleBruce (We voted - NOW we fight against vote fraud! Tea Party like it's 1773! Pray 2 Chron. 7:14!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
Rangel: 'I have no real chance of fighting back'

You've stalled, lied and dodged for years. If you've finally run out of ways to dance away from responsibility for your crimes it's still years late.

56 posted on 11/15/2010 4:59:36 PM PST by highlander_UW (Education is too important to abdicate control of it to the government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pearls Before Swine

“He’s been re-elected.”

Isn’t that amazing? What a world we live in...


57 posted on 11/15/2010 5:03:15 PM PST by SeattleBruce (We voted - NOW we fight against vote fraud! Tea Party like it's 1773! Pray 2 Chron. 7:14!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Obadiah

‘And that’s what William “Cold Cash” Jefferson said too!’

At least he got jettisoned from the Congress...


58 posted on 11/15/2010 5:06:47 PM PST by SeattleBruce (We voted - NOW we fight against vote fraud! Tea Party like it's 1773! Pray 2 Chron. 7:14!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; Arthur Wildfire! March; Berosus; bigheadfred; ColdOne; Convert from ECUSA; Delacon; ...

besides the same stuff about his not being able to afford an attorney, there’s this tidbit:

“The adjudicatory subcommittee is meeting behind closed doors Monday afternoon to determine if Rangel committed the 13 counts of House ethics violations that are alleged against him. If he is found guilty of the violations, he could face a full House vote on his expulsion or a lesser punishment.”

Rangel Used Leadership PAC Funds for Legal Fees
National Legal & Policy Center | November 14, 2010 | Ken Boehm
Posted on 11/14/2010 9:47:59 AM PST by jazusamo
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2627018/posts


59 posted on 11/15/2010 5:11:09 PM PST by SunkenCiv (The 2nd Amendment follows right behind the 1st because some people are hard of hearing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver; SunkenCiv; ml/nj; firebrand; rmlew; ExTexasRedhead; Cicero; Clemenza; The Mayor; ...
If Rangel wants to get out of the House Ethics Committee charges, all he needs to do is resign from the House, so that the committee will no longer have jurisdiction over him.

In the meanwhile, he's merely playing games over the issue of legal representation in an attempt to garner sympathy from the public. Rangel undoubtedly knows that the procedural rules for the committee are determined by the committee itself.

The constitutional guarantee of legal representation applies to criminal defendants in criminal courts only. In other proceedings, the right to counsel may or may not be granted depending upon the specific rules of the authority presiding over the proceeding and/or the applicable law.

60 posted on 11/15/2010 5:54:00 PM PST by justiceseeker93
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-87 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson