Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hugh Hewitt: Just say no to Nancy Reagan
Washington Examiner ^

Posted on 11/15/2010 9:04:22 PM PST by roses of sharon

With all due respect to Nancy Reagan, her proposal that the first Republican debate of the 2012 season be held at the Reagan Library in the spring of 2011 is worse than a nonstarter. The country needs to focus on the hugely important congressional debates this spring, not on made-for-MSM, liberal-dominated GOP wrestling matches.

The idea is itself an insult to conservative activists and new media. A quick rejection by GOP candidates of the presumptuous declaration of inevitability by Politico.com and NBC that they would be in charge would go a long way toward recognizing that these outlets, like most of the Beltway-Manhattan media elite, went in the tank for President Obama in 2008 and won't be allowed to dictate the terms of the 2012 presidential race.

Full disclosure: In addition to my radio show, I write for The Examiner and Townhall.com. I used to receive an occasional invitation to write for Politico or to appear on MSNBC, but as those outlets have gone left -- slowly, in the case of Politico, or rapidly and without reservation for NBC and its Olbermann subsidiary -- those invites have stopped. That's fine. I still enjoy having Politico's Mike Allen on my show as a regular guest most Tuesdays, and I read Politico every day.

But both outlets are significantly biased to the left, and not just to the president, but to the whole Beltway culture which is inherently big-government oriented and dominated by the conventional big-government wisdom about every debate. Very few Beltway media voices retain any connection to the conservative grass roots or the GOP's base, and those that do don't work at Politico or NBC.

In fact, those journalists never appear at these debates, which are instead given over to lefties like the affable Anderson Cooper, the professional but still MSM-driven Wolf Blitzer, the amiable Brian Williams or the talented-but-still-Beltway-driven John Harris or Jim Lehrer.

Can we be honest? They are all liberals. All of them. Not one of the questioners that could or would be proposed by Politico or NBC would be remotely in touch with the cares, concerns, and passions of the GOP's primary electorate. The process of choosing a GOP nominee should not be mediated by the left-wing media -- again.

I discussed this topic with one of my favorite Beltway pundits, the Washington Post's Chris Cillizza, on Friday's radio show. Cillizza gamely defended his guild, but here's the key exchange:

HH: OK, objectively, what would get more ratings and be more interesting, a panel of Brian Williams and John Harris and Anderson Cooper asking eight Republicans questions, or a panel of Mark Levin, Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity and Michael Medved -- four different radio networks -- asking the same people questions? What would be more interesting, Chris?

CC: And I don't want to sit on the fence, but I think, I mean, I think there would be two different sets of questions, potentially.

HH: Oh, hugely.

CC: But I don't know that either of them would be uninteresting.

Beltway liberals asking MSM questions would indeed be different than opinion journalists of the center-right, and I suspect far less intelligent and challenging as the questions posed by my panel, which would probe things like the constitutionality of the individual mandate while avoiding questions from plants in the audience, Santa Claus, and the endless abortion questions which marked 2008's "debates" and which the liberal MSM "journalists" manufactures to advance the left's agenda on a four-year interval.

There are scores of conservative journalists to people the panels and center-right outlets to sponsor GOP debates when they begin, which hopefully will not be until the fall of 2011.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2012; 2012debates; hughhewitt; nancyreagan; reaganlibrary
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-59 next last
I agree with Hugh here, time for a change in Republican debates.
1 posted on 11/15/2010 9:04:24 PM PST by roses of sharon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: roses of sharon

Agree.


2 posted on 11/15/2010 9:05:33 PM PST by sageb1 (This is the Final Crusade, There are only two sides. Pick one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: roses of sharon

With all due respect to Nancy Reagan...Hewitt is correct.


3 posted on 11/15/2010 9:06:22 PM PST by Artemis Webb (I support Nancy Pelosi for Minority Leader!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: roses of sharon

Hewitt is exactly right, and he should be on that panel.


4 posted on 11/15/2010 9:10:13 PM PST by TChad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: roses of sharon
or a panel of Mark Levin, Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity and Michael Medved --

No, how about some unknown people who understand the Constitution asking hardcore questions? Why does it have to be celebrities?

Enough with the celebrities.

5 posted on 11/15/2010 9:10:43 PM PST by FlyVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: roses of sharon

I agree.


6 posted on 11/15/2010 9:10:47 PM PST by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: roses of sharon

I agree with Hugh here, time for a change in Republican debates.

*************

Indeed.


7 posted on 11/15/2010 9:13:58 PM PST by Psalm 144
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: roses of sharon

I may get flamed for this, but it’s also time to move on from the Reagan adoration.

I strongly believe in understanding history, honoring it, and learning from it, but the continual references to Reagan are wearing thin. He has been gone for decades.

The conservative argument must be made for today and for the future, not looking backward. Continually talking about the Reagan years makes it look like today’s conservatives want to live in the past and have no answers for today’s problems.

Reagan’s place in history is assured. He was right about many things. But a huge percentage of the electorate has no personal memory of his Presidency.

We need new leaders who can articulate conservative principles for today’s world.


8 posted on 11/15/2010 9:14:28 PM PST by Jedidah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: roses of sharon
Totally agree. I fact I really don't see anything wrong with Rush, Hannity or Mark Levin moderating a Republican debate. Why have the usual lefty enemies moderate a Republican debate, doesn't make sense in any way, shape or form.
9 posted on 11/15/2010 9:16:01 PM PST by The Cajun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: roses of sharon
Brit Hume and Major Garret would give the panel some heft as well from the cable news perspective. And how about Laura Ingraham? Thomas Sowell?
10 posted on 11/15/2010 9:17:04 PM PST by TheThinker (Communists: taking over the world one kooky doomsday scenario at a time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FlyVet

Agreed, and I am sure Hugh does too...most of us would like to see a panel of “celebs” maybe just once, it would be fun and serious too.


11 posted on 11/15/2010 9:18:21 PM PST by roses of sharon (I can do all things through Him who strengthens me. Philippians 4:13)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: FlyVet
Mark Levin, Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity and Michael Medved

What would be interesting would be to have this panel, sans the simpleton Hannity, as moderators and questioners for the Dem primary debates.

12 posted on 11/15/2010 9:19:12 PM PST by Minn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: roses of sharon

Oh yeah. It’s time to STOP letting the libs and Rinos define the debates or the where these debates will happen. Open forum, head to head with only a mediator for enforcement of the time limit.

Libs, Socialists and Rinos will be destroyed in this setting.

That damn old truth will be destroy liars in the light of day and it’s enemies will be exposed.


13 posted on 11/15/2010 9:19:47 PM PST by liberty or death
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jedidah
I strongly believe in understanding history, honoring it, and learning from it, but the continual references to Reagan are wearing thin. He has been gone for decades.

People tend to forget history and have to be reminded of past heros. Reagan was a champion against oppressive government and for individual freedom, individual rights and therefore individual empowerment.

He was truly the Great Communicator of timeless principles. He cannot be spoken of enough.

14 posted on 11/15/2010 9:22:25 PM PST by TheThinker (Communists: taking over the world one kooky doomsday scenario at a time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: roses of sharon

Why are we even talking about Presidential debates next Spring. This is rediculous 18 months before a Presidential election and 8 months before the 1st primary. It’s time to roll this back to have Presidential Primaries in the Spring instead of immediately after New Years 2012.


15 posted on 11/15/2010 9:23:45 PM PST by Steelers6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: liberty or death

I have an idea for the ultimate presidential debates, which could apply to a primary debate.

Let the participants select questioners. They would no doubt pick heavyweight supporters, and the strategy of picking who will go after your opponents would be very interesting.


16 posted on 11/15/2010 9:27:45 PM PST by Williams (It's the policies, stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: roses of sharon
NO-NO-NO ...to taking the spot light off Obama.

NO-NO-NO to letting liberals control the early agenda!

17 posted on 11/15/2010 9:29:10 PM PST by Baynative ( 11 / 2 / 2010 !!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: roses of sharon

I agree and glad someone spoke out against it.


18 posted on 11/15/2010 9:31:28 PM PST by presently no screen name ("Thus you nullify the word of God by your tradition that you have handed down.." Mark 7:13)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: roses of sharon
The first ever "Talk Radio Republican Primary Debate."

Would half the candidates dare show up?

19 posted on 11/15/2010 9:34:11 PM PST by DTogo (High time to bring back the Sons of Liberty !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Cajun
Why have the usual lefty enemies moderate a Republican debate, doesn't make sense in any way, shape or form.

It does to the lefties - and they got a head start on it.

Rush would be excellent but no to Hannity.
20 posted on 11/15/2010 9:34:34 PM PST by presently no screen name ("Thus you nullify the word of God by your tradition that you have handed down.." Mark 7:13)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Jedidah

I don’t mind the adoration for Ronald Reagan, he was a great President and his ideas are timeless. Michael Reagan is best at representing his father now.

President Reagan loved Nancy, but she either doesn’t remember or the absence of being the target for many years that these left-wingers who now kind of admire her or use her conveniently, said the same thing about her and her husband that they are saying about any Conservative now.

If I am thinking about running I would politely decline for now since I have not made the committment to run. I think Hewitt is also correct, in 2008 the Democrats would not have a Fox News Debate and eventually would not debate on CNN if Lou Dobbs or any moderator that wasn’t a leftist were not suitable for them.

Conservatives should not debate on MSLSD, they aren’t interested in debates, they are interested in destroying the Republican field and promoting the RINO’s to divide the party.


21 posted on 11/15/2010 9:34:39 PM PST by Steelers6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: roses of sharon
OK, I understand why we shouldn't let leftist MSM outlets control the debates. That's a no-brainer.

But can someone explain to me the problem with having the debate at the Reagan Library? I don't see how the two issues are connected, or what Hewitt is getting at with respect to Nancy Regan. It seems you could obviously have a conservative dream team panel, but still have it at the Reagan Library. What gives?

22 posted on 11/15/2010 9:35:16 PM PST by GunRunner (10 Years of Freeping...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Williams

It’s a debate. When have they actually been allowed to debate what matters? They have become boring and predictable just like the nightly MSM news. (All left wing all the time.)


23 posted on 11/15/2010 9:37:12 PM PST by liberty or death
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: roses of sharon

We have Parties ... Tea Parties, no debate necessary, SH Politicians just need to do what Hillary said she wanted to do “LISTEN”

I think we just shouted pretty loud, we can Shout even louder 2012...

I’m tired of Politicians PERIOD ... they better hear us soon or they better get out of the way ... by 2014 we may be able to retire the Majority of “Career Politicians” and one of the first cuts is their RETIREMENT! (I actually have a four or five page Rant in my head, I’ll share it later)

TT


24 posted on 11/15/2010 9:41:48 PM PST by TexasTransplant (I don't mind liberals... I hate liars...there just tends to be a high degree of overlap)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GunRunner
I didn't take that from Hugh....I assumed he was just speaking about the timing and the moderators.

I could be wrong...

Maybe the Reagan Library is working with Politico and NBC to schedule the debate?

It sounds like that is what Hewitt is describing here.

25 posted on 11/15/2010 9:42:19 PM PST by roses of sharon (I can do all things through Him who strengthens me. Philippians 4:13)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: TexasTransplant

My rant is very short:

SACK DC.


26 posted on 11/15/2010 9:45:03 PM PST by roses of sharon (I can do all things through Him who strengthens me. Philippians 4:13)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: GunRunner
It seems you could obviously have a conservative dream team panel, but still have it at the Reagan Library.

I suspect that Nancy Reagan already rejected that idea, or Hewitt would not have openly criticized her.

27 posted on 11/15/2010 9:53:17 PM PST by TChad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: liberty or death; Lazamataz

Today we have Career Politicians combined with MSM, Together they become a

“SELF LICKING ICE CREAM CONE”

(Don’t have any idea why Laz has to be pinged, just thought I would... maybe he could supply a dash of levity to such a horrible recipe of our current reality)

TT


28 posted on 11/15/2010 9:58:49 PM PST by TexasTransplant (I don't mind liberals... I hate liars...there just tends to be a high degree of overlap)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: presently no screen name
Rush would be excellent but no to Hannity.

Don't want to get into a Hannity war, but I truly believe he is a conservative and doesn't get enough credit for the work he does (second largest audience in talk radio).
If you wanted brutal conservative honesty, Mark Levin would be the man. No liberal crap gets by him.

29 posted on 11/15/2010 10:06:12 PM PST by The Cajun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: roses of sharon

Don’t know if it’s possible but a single short little Bill that simply says “What applies to Us applies to You”

No Perks Bill and We Prosecute all Politician /Lobbyist relationships (Repeal... “WE ASK THEY DON’T TELL”)

TT


30 posted on 11/15/2010 10:06:36 PM PST by TexasTransplant (I don't mind liberals... I hate liars...there just tends to be a high degree of overlap)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: FlyVet

“No, how about some unknown people who understand the Constitution asking hardcore questions? Why does it have to be celebrities? “

I want a FReeper debate :)


31 posted on 11/15/2010 10:16:06 PM PST by ari-freedom (Islam is at war against America, while America is at the mall.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: DTogo
I think they should have a Republican debate moderated by Keith Olbermann, with Rachel Maddow, Chris Matthews, and Special Ed asking questions. Seriously. The cream would rise to the top and a true conservative candidate willing to speak the truth would make all of their heads explode, and we'd see a President in the making.

In return, Rush moderates the inevitable Dem debate that ensues when Obama is challenged in 2012, along with a panel including Sean Hannity, Glenn Beck and/or Laura Ingraham or Ann Coulter. Maybe Greg Gutfeld. Or any combination thereof.

No ground rules.

I can dream can't I? ;)

32 posted on 11/15/2010 10:28:18 PM PST by MacMattico
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: TexasTransplant

TT that self licking cone is a first for me. Almost blew my Dewars out my nose.


33 posted on 11/15/2010 10:33:02 PM PST by liberty or death
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: The Cajun

Didn’t mean to give impression that I didn’t think Hannity isn’t a major force for our side. And he does do many good things - more than what is know, I bet.

I’m not impressed with the way he interviews liberals - it just seems he’s more concerned with wanting to be liked more than going for the juggler.;)

IMO, he’s swayed by what’s expected of him or what others may think of him. So with this, he would think he’d have to be hard for ‘show’. Again, IMO. Besides I’m not sure where his allegiance is - to the rino’s or conservatives. I haven’t listened to him in years - my schedule changed.


34 posted on 11/15/2010 10:35:38 PM PST by presently no screen name ("Thus you nullify the word of God by your tradition that you have handed down.." Mark 7:13)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: roses of sharon

In fact, let’s have Rush, Hannity, MedVed, Coulter moderate the Democratic debates.

Fair’s fair!


35 posted on 11/15/2010 10:47:43 PM PST by ROTB (Without a Christian revival, we are government slaves, or nuked by China/Russia during armed revolt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Cajun

I’d take Rush or Levin, but I’d have to change the channel everytime hannity called everyone a great American and started throwing a football around.


36 posted on 11/15/2010 10:53:40 PM PST by esoxmagnum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: roses of sharon
SACK DC.

We need a constitutional amendment that requires the House of Representatives and the Senate to be moved every two years. At least part of the reason the capitol was located in D.C. was because it was a swamp and it was thought that the lawmakers wouldn't want to de camp there year round. With legislators meeting part-time, it was correctly thought that this would result in less federal mischief.

Additionally, our founders wisely believed that the principle of divided gov't also included preventing the capitol city from becoming a power unto itself.

As for examples of what happened when a nation's most populous and wealthy city also became its capitol, the founder had only to look to Europe. Inevitably, locating the capitol in London or Paris or Rome led to an unhealthy concentration of wealth and political power in the hands of those who controlled the capitol. This pattern has been repeated in most countries with the notable exception of the United States.

But now we see Washington D.C. becoming a metropolis until itself with 7 of the 10 most wealthy counties in the United States all being located around Washington D.C. So I say the time has come to neuter Washington D.C. and to start rotating the capitol among the fair states of this land. Do it by lottery or do it by vote, but however it is done, do it quickly before Washington D.C. devours the nation it is supposed to serve.

37 posted on 11/15/2010 10:57:03 PM PST by vbmoneyspender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: TheThinker
Brit and Major would be good choices, if allowed to prepare questions. Rush would do well as a walk in cameo role to ask follow up questions to answers, he has a way of cutting to the chase in a sentence or two.
38 posted on 11/15/2010 11:00:53 PM PST by going hot (Happiness is a Momma Deuce)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: ROTB

Medved would not be able to hide his anti-Palin, anti-conservative bias.


39 posted on 11/15/2010 11:31:03 PM PST by ansel12 (Mitt Romney supporter, and anti-tea party figure, Eric Cantor, won this battle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: TChad

Yeah, something is funny, Hewitt is no rebel, he is a Mitt Romney worshiper who actually wrote a book promoting Mitt Romney to Christians.


40 posted on 11/15/2010 11:34:01 PM PST by ansel12 (Mitt Romney supporter, and anti-tea party figure, Eric Cantor, won this battle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: liberty or death

I think I heard Col Allen West mention the self licking cone in one of his speeches (he was making fun of something)
I just stole that part and added it to “What do we get with Career Politicians and MSM... a Self Licking Ice Cream Cone”

My concern is the freaking Ice Cream is melting and making a mess and you know them whiners are going to want another cone from our kids, and one from their kids etc... and that’s just this batch of MSM/Politicians, what will the next batch of MSM/politicians want? and the next?

This just needs to end... these clowns have not measured up .. they ain’t tall enough for the Ferris wheel, let alone the ride you and I are on.

TT


41 posted on 11/15/2010 11:39:17 PM PST by TexasTransplant (I don't mind liberals... I hate liars...there just tends to be a high degree of overlap)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: ansel12
he is a Mitt Romney worshiper

Fan yes, worshiper no. And that book was a commercial success.

But I agree with you that something is going on here, there is a back story.

42 posted on 11/16/2010 12:52:32 AM PST by TChad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Artemis Webb

I agree, the MSM NBC Olberman types will drench our candidates with pisspots of low ball questions and smears.


43 posted on 11/16/2010 1:21:26 AM PST by Nextrush (Slocialist Republicans and Socialist Democrats need to go)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: going hot

How about Judge Napolitano on the panel? We would very quickly learn who knows the Constitution.


44 posted on 11/16/2010 1:26:41 AM PST by matchgirl (May God bless our troops and bring them home safely with honor!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Jedidah

Yeah, the same way we’ve moved on from other Presidents of the past, like FDR, Lincoln, Washington. Reagan is the greatest President of our generation. Why would we want to move on from the legacy he left? His legacy needs to be remembered and shared with the next generation, not forgotten!


45 posted on 11/16/2010 4:21:11 AM PST by My hearts in London - Everett (You will try to nudge commies toward the truth, while they try to nudge you toward the cattle cars.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: FlyVet

Maybe not THOSE guys, but Conservatives would ask TOUGHER questions because WE EAT OUR OWN!


46 posted on 11/16/2010 5:21:06 AM PST by Ann Archy (Abortion......the Human Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: My hearts in London - Everett

You are absolutely right, and make my point perfectly.

We look up to the great Presidents of the past, and Reagan stands proudly among them.

But we don’t run our candidates on their records.

I don’t know how old you are, but I’m getting up there. Reagan may have been the “greatest President of our generation” for many Americans, but we are rapidly approaching the point where most of the electorate have no recollection of his time in office.

I’d laugh at a politician who was continually referring to a President who left office before I was even born.

It’s time to apply Reagan principles to new policies and own them instead of invoking his name continually. It sounds old, stale, passe, to too many voters, and that’s a mistake.


47 posted on 11/16/2010 6:54:08 AM PST by Jedidah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Steelers6
Michael Reagan is best at representing his father now.

"Welcome back, dad. Even if you're bearing children and wearing a skirt."

Creepy at best.

48 posted on 11/16/2010 6:57:26 AM PST by Norman Bates
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Jedidah

We are in agreement. Reagan was an exceptional president, but we cannot wallow in the past. It makes the GOP look like navelgazers who have a dearth of ideas. Outsiders instinctively shirk away from perceived oversentimentality.


49 posted on 11/16/2010 7:01:41 AM PST by Norman Bates
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Norman Bates

Thank you for saying it much better than I did.

I just want to win elections, and I fear that this “Reagan, Reagan, Reagan” mantra is beginning to hurt the cause, make us sound like we don’t have today’s answers to today’s problems.


50 posted on 11/16/2010 7:06:42 AM PST by Jedidah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-59 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson