Posted on 11/16/2010 3:39:37 PM PST by Chunga85
H.R. 3808: to require any Federal or State court to recognize any notarization made by a notary public licensed by a State other than the State where the court is located when such notarization occurs in or affects interstate commerce
2:14 P.M. - VETO MESSAGE FROM THE PRESIDENT – The Chair laid before the House the veto message from the President on H.R. 3808. The objections of the President were spread at large upon the Journal, and the veto message was ordered to be printed as a House Document No. 111-152. Pursuant to the order of the House of earlier today, further consideration of the veto message and the bill are postponed until the legislative day of Wednesday, Nov. 17, 2010, and that on that legislative day, the House shall proceed to the constitutional question of reconsideration and dispose of such question without intervening motion.
2:13 P.M. - The House received a message from the Clerk. Pursuant to the permission granted in Clause 2(h) of Rule II of the Rules of the U.S. House of Representatives, the Clerk transmitted H.R. 3808, the “Interstate Recognition of Notarization Act of 2010,” and a Memorandum of Disapproval thereon received from the White House on October 8, 2010, at 12:55 p.m.
(Excerpt) Read more at 4closurefraud.org ...
Mr. Scott (VA) asked unanimous consent That, when the House adjourns on Monday, November 15, 2010, it adjourn to meet at 12:30 p.m. on Tuesday, November 16, 2010, for Morning-Hour Debate. Agreed to without objection.
Mr. Scott (VA) asked unanimous consent That, when a veto message on H.R. 3808 is laid before the House on the legislative day of today, then after the message is read and the objections of the President are spread at large upon the Journal, further consideration of the veto message and the bill shall be postponed until the legislative day of Wednesday, Nov. 17, 2010; and that on that legislative day, the House shall proceed to the constitutional question of reconsideration and dispose of such question without intervening motion. Agreed to without objection.
Video – Someone is Upset about H.R. 3808 The Interstate Recognition of Notarizations Act of 2010
If you care about property rights contact your rep tomorrow!
Amazing that nobody here seems to understand what this is about.
Yes. It is stunning that the very core of the Constitution is being destroyed right before our eyes.
The Founding Fathers are rolling around in their graves.
We've become a nation of complacent, ignorant, cowards and will get what we deserve.
FWIW...I called my congressman's D.C. office already and will call again tomorrow.
And once again, I predicted that his fake veto would soon become public. And it obvious that 0's New World Order handlers have pressured Congress already.
The best thing that could happen now is millions of people in the streets peacefully protecting Obama's obvious and blatant fraud . . . Just like in Greece:
I’m not sure what they are trying to do with this, but I’ve had documents notarized in one state and recognized in other states - off the top of my head, I think notarized in about 8 states, and recognized in about 7 receiving states. You still have to comply with receiving state requirements as to number of witnesses, and in a few rare cases, form, but I’ve never seen the problem that they purport to want to solve.
Then please summarize in simple terms.
This very act ought compel all freedom-loving citizens to march on Washington.
It’s time once again to throw off the chains of government which has become unresponsive to its people to their own detriment.
They want "electronically notarized" documents accepted by state courts as validly notarized, though they have NOT been. If you don't believe that the documents have been notarized properly, just ask the Big Banks - they'll you, from the bottom of their selfless, altruistic little hearts.
They specifically want MERS assignments to be validated, because a lot of state judges are beginning to balk at the stench of fraudulent foreclosure filings.
For in-depth information, go to 4closurefraud.com
You may have, but if it were in your interest to contest an electronic signature with an electronic notarial affixed, there is no recourse. How can you even be sure the signor or the notary are true persons and have actually met and actually proved the document(s) in question?
The actual problem comes from electronically affixing notary seals. There is no way to know 100% who has witnessed what or when. A signature can be placed at anytime on a scanned document with a seal applied also at any time. One could retrieve a copy of an electronic document today and affix any seals or signatures backdated to any time in the past.
If banksters are in favor of HR3808, you can believe there’s an underlying motive to cover some filthy ass.
If Congress passes this knowing the stakes for the rule of law, they will prove to be complicit the banks’ fraud, corruption, forgeries, and my trust for either institution will have completely vanished..
I’ve called mine and sent him an email expressing my views.
With a voice only vote, it hides the sleazy, traitorous cowards from public scrutiny and chastisement.
So, essentially you’re saying they are trying to make fraud easier to do and to hide?
Thx.
I can't be sure either but I have a hunch it might be a stepping stone to MERS II.
All your land records are belong to us.
They cannot be contested and resistance is futile.
Welcome to America, Inc.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.