Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Podesta: Obama Can Use ĎArmed Forcesí to Push Progressive Agenda (WTF?!?)
The Blaze ^ | 11/18/10 | Jonathon Seidl

Posted on 11/18/2010 10:10:08 AM PST by My Favorite Headache

The liberal Center for American Progress doesn’t believe significant GOP gains in the House and Senate should stop the President from implementing more of his polices. The group released a report Tuesday suggesting ways Obama can bypass Congress to accomplish a progressive agenda, and it cites the president’s power as commander-in-chief to make its point.

“I think most of the conversation since the election has been about how President Obama adjusts to the new situation on Capitol Hill,” Center for American Progress head and former Bill Clinton Chief of Staff John Podesta told the Daily Caller. “While that’s an important conversation, it simply ignores the president’s ability to use all levels of his power and authority to move the country forward.”

How does one “move the country forward”? In the center’s report, Podesta explains that Obama can use executive orders, rulemaking, and even the armed forces “to accomplish important change” and that such means “should not be underestimated.”

What exactly does Podesta think the president should use such powers to “accomplish”? Among others, the report suggests “job creation,“ ”quality affordable health care,“ ”sustainable security,“ and ”a clean energy future.”

The report cites specific goals such as mitigating the effects of the military’s “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” policy, supporting a Palestinian state, and reducing greenhouse gasses by 17 percent by 2020.

“The U.S. Constitution and the laws of our nation grant the president significant authority to make and implement policy,” Podesta writes. ”Congressional gridlock does not mean the federal government stands still.”

Statement from John D. Podesta November 15, 2010

In the aftermath of this month’s midterm congressional elections, pundits and politicians across the ideological spectrum are focusing on how difficult it will be for President Barack Obama to advance his policy priorities through Congress. Predictions of stalemate abound. And some debate whether the administration should tack to the left or to the center and compromise with or confront the new House leadership.

As a former White House chief of staff, I believe those to be the wrong preoccupations. President Obama’s ability to govern the country as chief executive presents an opportunity to demonstrate strength, resolve, and a capacity to get things done on a host of pressing challenges of importance to the public and our economy. Progress, not positioning, is what the public wants and deserves.

The U.S. Constitution and the laws of our nation grant the president significant authority to make and implement policy. These authorities can be used to ensure positive progress on many of the key issues facing the country through:

* Executive orders * Rulemaking * Agency management * Convening and creating public-private partnerships * Commanding the armed forces * Diplomacy

The ability of President Obama to accomplish important change through these powers should not be underestimated. President Bush, for example, faced a divided Congress throughout most of his term in office, yet few can doubt his ability to craft a unique and deeply conservative agenda using every aspect of the policymaking apparatus at his disposal. And, after his party lost control of Congress in 1994, President Clinton used executive authority and convening power to make significant progressive change. For instance, he protected more great spaces in the lower 48 states than any president since Theodore Roosevelt, established for the first time significant protections for Americans’ medical privacy, and urged the creation of the Welfare-to-Work Partnership that enlisted the help of 20,000 businesses in moving more than 1 million welfare recipients into the workforce.

The upshot: Congressional gridlock does not mean the federal government stands still. This administration has a similar opportunity to use available executive authorities while also working with Congress where possible. At the Center for American Progress, we look forward to our nation continuing to make progress.

Read the full report (pdf)

Download the executive summary (pdf)

Download the report to e-readers and mobile devices from Scribd

To speak with our experts on this topic, please contact:

Print: Megan Smith (health care, education, economic policy) 202.741.6346 or msmith@americanprogress.org

Print: Anna Soellner (foreign policy and security, energy) asoellner@americanprogress.org

Print: Raúl Arce-Contreras (ethnic media, immigration) 202.478.5318 or rarcecontreras@americanprogress.org

Radio: Laura Pereyra 202.741.6258 or lpereyra@americanprogress.org

TV: Andrea Purse 202.741.6250 or apurse@americanprogress.org

Web: Erin Lindsay 202.741.6397 or elindsay@americanprogress.org http://www.americanprogress.org/issues/2010/11/executive_orders.html/#statement


TOPICS: Breaking News; Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 1shot1kill; 3branchesofgovt; 527; antiamerican; astroturfers; bho44; bhofascism; bhotyranny; bloodoftyrants; cap; clinton; communism; cw2; cwii; cwiiping; dangerous; democrats; donttreadonme; fascism; fundedbysoros; islam; liberalfascism; liberalprogressivism; liberals; nwo; obama; obamaadvisor; obamalegacy; obamatruthfile; obamunism; palin; podesta; powergrab; progressives; radicals; rapeofliberty; sedition; shadowgovernment; shadowparty; socialistdemocrats; soros; spookydude; transitionteam; tyranny; unions; usurper; vanjones
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-150151-200 ... 351-384 next last

1 posted on 11/18/2010 10:10:13 AM PST by My Favorite Headache
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: My Favorite Headache

I have warned conservatives many times that the communist playbook calls for crushing their enemies physically.


2 posted on 11/18/2010 10:12:40 AM PST by Nachum (The complete Obama list at www.nachumlist.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: My Favorite Headache

Old Adolph comes to mind for some reason.
I’m just having a hard time pinpointing why.. /S


3 posted on 11/18/2010 10:14:26 AM PST by Darksheare (I shook hands with Sheryl Crow and all I got was Typhus and a single sheet of toilet paper.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: My Favorite Headache

the hell??


4 posted on 11/18/2010 10:14:26 AM PST by rahbert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Illegality means nothing to these people.


5 posted on 11/18/2010 10:14:33 AM PST by Parmy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: My Favorite Headache

There’s that “domestic military” Obama said he wanted.


6 posted on 11/18/2010 10:14:54 AM PST by MeganC (January 20, 2013)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: My Favorite Headache
Clinton...established for the first time significant protections for Americans’ medical privacy, and urged the creation of the Welfare-to-Work Partnership that enlisted the help of 20,000 businesses in moving more than 1 million welfare recipients into the workforce.

No, he did not! A Republican congress twisted his arms and made him move to the center to sign these laws.

7 posted on 11/18/2010 10:15:08 AM PST by apoxonu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: My Favorite Headache

The American serviceman serves the People and protects the constitution.

Not the despot in chief.

One wonders if he were to give such an illegal order, how long it would take for the joint chiefs to remove him from office.


8 posted on 11/18/2010 10:15:21 AM PST by Grunthor (Touch my junk and Ill knock you the f**k out)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: My Favorite Headache

Don’t you love how they think that Clinton’s illegal land grab was the best thing since sliced bread?


9 posted on 11/18/2010 10:15:26 AM PST by GraceG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: My Favorite Headache

Podesta, you are a f***ing commie whose time to expire is long overdue!


10 posted on 11/18/2010 10:15:39 AM PST by rj45mis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: My Favorite Headache

Bingo! Allowing homosexuals to serve openly will lead to militant gay cliques in the military, will drive out heterosexuals and will turn the military into a politically correct political instrument.

We are so stupid falling for non issues. Why should anyone in the military be talking about what they do with a homosexual sex partner? Why should that issue matter to our military?


11 posted on 11/18/2010 10:16:00 AM PST by Williams (It's the policies, stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rahbert

My stomach just dropped to the floor. If there was ever a time people...ever a time...to load up on everything we need the time is now. Our volunteer military better not turn on us...


12 posted on 11/18/2010 10:16:19 AM PST by My Favorite Headache (In a world where I feel so small, I can't stop thinking big.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: My Favorite Headache

The advantage is EO can be undone by the next sitting President.


13 posted on 11/18/2010 10:16:25 AM PST by EBH ( Whether you eat your bread or see it vanish into a looter's stomach, is an absolute.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: My Favorite Headache

Bring it on.


14 posted on 11/18/2010 10:16:43 AM PST by ClearCase_guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Williams

HIV/AIDS/HepC comes to mind.


15 posted on 11/18/2010 10:17:10 AM PST by Darksheare (I shook hands with Sheryl Crow and all I got was Typhus and a single sheet of toilet paper.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: My Favorite Headache

I’m shocked, but I also knew it was only a matter of time. I had hoped (and indeed, prayed) that saner minds would prevail, and there’s still hope that they might. But this is truly beyond the pale.


16 posted on 11/18/2010 10:17:27 AM PST by MizSterious ("Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable." -JFK)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: apoxonu
A Republican congress twisted his arms and made him move to the center to sign these laws.

You're correct. And, if memory serves, Clinton vetoed this twice before. He only signed it because there was a veto-proof majority the 3rd time around.

17 posted on 11/18/2010 10:17:47 AM PST by Puppage (You may disagree with what I have to say, but I shall defend to your death my right to say it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

This is why when defending the US Constitution according to their oaths, military officers MUST confront whether their Commander-in-Chief is Constitutionally qualified for the job. If he is not, then they themselves become the weapon a tyrant uses AGAINST the Constitution and the American people.

Podesta accidentally revealed why no military person should obey this Kenyan who was put in place by coup - never having met the Constitution’s 2 procedural qualifications to become POTUS (being lawfully certified as the electoral winner, and “qualifying” before Jan 20th)


18 posted on 11/18/2010 10:17:55 AM PST by butterdezillion (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Darksheare

Liberals really are a cancer.


19 posted on 11/18/2010 10:18:05 AM PST by gthog61
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: My Favorite Headache

It seems the TSA has already taken a page from Podestas.


20 posted on 11/18/2010 10:18:29 AM PST by Track9 (Let Freedom Ring!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: My Favorite Headache

Dont worry, did you read the replies?

This one said it best:
XXXXXXX XXXXXXXX
Posted on November 18, 2010 at 12:55pm
Hey Podesta…my SON is in the armed forces. He AINT going to take those kinds of orders. Get over it — our military belongs to US! They are our sons and daughters. You will never have control of our military, you progresso libtard commies.

“They are our sons and daughters”

GO AMERICA!


21 posted on 11/18/2010 10:18:43 AM PST by ConservativeChris
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gthog61

Ebola.
On crack and steroids.


22 posted on 11/18/2010 10:18:54 AM PST by Darksheare (I shook hands with Sheryl Crow and all I got was Typhus and a single sheet of toilet paper.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: rj45mis
time to expire is long overdue

PAGING HENRY BOWMAN! PAGING HENRY BOWMAN! PICK UP THE NEAREST RED PHONE!

23 posted on 11/18/2010 10:18:55 AM PST by DCBryan1 (FORGET the lawyers...first kill the "journalists". (Die Ritter der Kokosnuss))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee
time to expire is long overdue

PAGING HENRY BOWMAN! PAGING HENRY BOWMAN! PICK UP THE NEAREST RED PHONE!

24 posted on 11/18/2010 10:19:14 AM PST by DCBryan1 (FORGET the lawyers...first kill the "journalists". (Die Ritter der Kokosnuss))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: MizSterious

This line sends chills up and down my spine:

How does one “move the country forward”? In the center’s report, Podesta explains that Obama can use executive orders, rulemaking, and even the armed forces “to accomplish important change” and that such means “should not be underestimated.”

“should not be underestimated.”

“should not be underestimated.”

“should not be underestimated.”

“should not be underestimated.”

That is a direct threat.


25 posted on 11/18/2010 10:19:22 AM PST by My Favorite Headache (In a world where I feel so small, I can't stop thinking big.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: My Favorite Headache

Scratch a “progressive” and a fascist bleeds.


26 posted on 11/18/2010 10:21:30 AM PST by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: My Favorite Headache

“President Bush, for example, faced a divided Congress throughout most of his term in office, yet few can doubt his ability to craft a unique and deeply conservative agenda using every aspect of the policymaking apparatus at his disposal.”

Huh? “a divided Congress throughout most of his term in office”? I suppose if you count McCain, Graham, Snowe, Collins, Voinovich, Murkowski....

“yet few can doubt his ability to craft a unique and deeply conservative agenda”!!! What? The Presciption Drugs program? Not touching Social Security and Medicare? No Child Left Behind? The Bailout? That part where he said the free market doesn’t work?


27 posted on 11/18/2010 10:21:32 AM PST by Kent C
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: My Favorite Headache

This is very serious.


28 posted on 11/18/2010 10:21:47 AM PST by bronxville
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: butterdezillion

“Seven Days In May” scenario?


29 posted on 11/18/2010 10:22:04 AM PST by Nachum (The complete Obama list at www.nachumlist.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Darksheare

If DADT is repealed will HIV+ Gays be allowed to join the military since I believe it is illegal to not hire a person who is HIV+.


30 posted on 11/18/2010 10:22:04 AM PST by massgopguy (I owe everything to George Bailey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: EBH

” The advantage is EO can be undone by the next sitting President. “

In the ‘Absolutely Worst Possible Scenario’, the ‘next sitting President’ might come to power in 20-30 years after a protracted - possibly bloody - struggle for succession...


31 posted on 11/18/2010 10:22:04 AM PST by Uncle Ike (Rope is cheap, and there are lots of trees...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeChris

Can anyone recall someone who has worked directly with the President on a day to day basis advising the use of military on its own people? What other time in history has this counsel been given?


32 posted on 11/18/2010 10:22:32 AM PST by My Favorite Headache (In a world where I feel so small, I can't stop thinking big.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: My Favorite Headache
CAP (Center for American Progress) is a George Soros creation.

You can be sure that everything Podesta says has been OK'ed by Soros.

33 posted on 11/18/2010 10:22:50 AM PST by Siena Dreaming
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: My Favorite Headache

I get a very suspicious and sick feeling whenever anyone says we need to “move the country forward”.


34 posted on 11/18/2010 10:23:55 AM PST by Never on my watch (Touch my junk and I call the cops!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: My Favorite Headache

They want to use the armed forces to push their agenda off onto the rest of the country. Stop or minimize enforcement of DADT to make homosexuality more acceptable. Then the next time that civil unions or gay marriage comes up, then they point at the military. They want to use the military as a wedge.

Look for G&L “quotas” in military promotions. Perhaps discrimination lawsuits for whatever for G or L servicemembers. He might be able to order PX/BX/NEX to have GLT observance month or something similar.


35 posted on 11/18/2010 10:24:32 AM PST by ConjunctionJunction (I can see November from my house!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: My Favorite Headache

To quote an American patriot: “Let’s roll.”


36 posted on 11/18/2010 10:24:39 AM PST by Hemingway's Ghost (Spirit of '75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: My Favorite Headache; hoosiermama; STARWISE; onyx; SE Mom; Liz; penelopesire; mojitojoe; LucyT; ...

How does one “move the country forward”? In the center’s report, Podesta explains that Obama can use executive orders, rulemaking, and even the armed forces “to accomplish important change” and that such means “should not be underestimated.”

PING!


37 posted on 11/18/2010 10:24:55 AM PST by maggief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeChris

If this person’s son doesn’t take those kinds of orders he will be court-martialed.

Just like Lt Col Lakin.

The people deciding the lawfulness of the orders Lakin disobeyed refused to include the Constitutionality of the orders as one of the elements of lawfulness, even though that criteria is specifically mentioned in Article 92 of the UCMJ.

That means that if this person’s son disobeys an order he can scream all he wants about the unlawfulness (unconstitutionality0 of the order, but RIGHT NOW, as we speak, the precedent is being set to totally remove the actual elements of Article 92 which define Constitutionality as one criteria for lawful orders.

Those who have tee-hee’ed the “birther” issue are shooting themselves - and their military sons and daughters - in a much more serious place than just their foot.


38 posted on 11/18/2010 10:24:55 AM PST by butterdezillion (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: My Favorite Headache
Podesta is a crook if he is encouraging 0bama to circumvent the Constitution!!
39 posted on 11/18/2010 10:25:02 AM PST by PATRIOT1876 (Language, Borders, Culture, Full employment for those here legally)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: massgopguy

Considering that ‘community’ is not known for monogamy and fidelity, it doesn’t matter if they are HIV+ at the start, there is a high chance they will acquire it at some point later.
And if they will force this on the military, they will force the induction of people with capability reducing diseases.


40 posted on 11/18/2010 10:25:09 AM PST by Darksheare (I shook hands with Sheryl Crow and all I got was Typhus and a single sheet of toilet paper.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: My Favorite Headache
Our volunteer military better not turn on us...

Sorry to say, but most will "follow orders".

41 posted on 11/18/2010 10:26:03 AM PST by Michael Barnes (Guilty of being White.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: My Favorite Headache

Okay, Podesta, then we will not “underestimate” anything you say. And don’t ever underestimate the will of the American people.


42 posted on 11/18/2010 10:26:46 AM PST by drierice (The 'stimulus' cost more than 6 years of the Iraq war.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: My Favorite Headache
For instance, he protected more great spaces in the lower 48 states than any president since Theodore Roosevelt

Yeah, Clinton presided over a massive Federal land grab. Podesta obviously believes that's a good thing, because his vision of Government is as a despotic, arbitrary power that rules a People, not an organization that humbly enacts the commands of the People.

43 posted on 11/18/2010 10:27:04 AM PST by agere_contra (...what if we won't eat the dog food?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: butterdezillion

Firing on our own citizens was stated to be considered an illegal order.
Then there are also laws against such actions...


44 posted on 11/18/2010 10:27:10 AM PST by Darksheare (I shook hands with Sheryl Crow and all I got was Typhus and a single sheet of toilet paper.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

Comment #45 Removed by Moderator

To: My Favorite Headache
Obama can use executive orders, rulemaking, and even the armed forces “to accomplish important change” and that such means “should not be underestimated.”
Buy an eclectic car or we will gun you down?

Buy health care or we will put you in front of the firing squad?

Dirty Harry Voice: Swell

46 posted on 11/18/2010 10:27:13 AM PST by Syncro (Sarah Palin, the unofficial Tea Party candidate for president--Virtual Jerusalem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: massgopguy

I believe that the Army cannot discharge soldiers simply because they are HIV+. They cannot deploy them, either.


47 posted on 11/18/2010 10:27:14 AM PST by ConjunctionJunction (I can see November from my house!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Darksheare

I am opposing openly gay in the military.


48 posted on 11/18/2010 10:27:47 AM PST by Williams (It's the policies, stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: My Favorite Headache

Did you add that acronym onto the title?


49 posted on 11/18/2010 10:28:06 AM PST by duckln
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: My Favorite Headache

I SAY BRING IT ON, PODESTA!

FORCE YOUR PUPPET PRESIDENT OBAMA TO DO YOU WISHES!

WE KNOW THAT IT’S NOT REALLY A FREUDIAN SLIP WHEN OBAMA TOLD HIS SUPPORTERS TO “PUNISH YOUR [US] ENEMY”!


50 posted on 11/18/2010 10:28:52 AM PST by convertedtoreason ( Nature tells us to take a LIBERTARIAN CONSERVATIVE stance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-150151-200 ... 351-384 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson