Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Palin daughters are threatened, taunted in Facebook war
Daily Caller ^ | 11/18/2010 | Laura Donovan

Posted on 11/18/2010 12:33:43 PM PST by markomalley

The Huffington Post reported Tuesday that 16-year-old Willow Palin “unloaded on [a] student” and “lashed out at multiple others” during a Facebook wall post war. But Palin was not the only Facebook user to throw out scathing insults.

Willow Palin is under immense media scrutiny and being dubbed “homophobic” by Gawker, a website that has made clear its unfavorable view of the Palin family, for describing one former schoolmate as “so gay” and a “faggot.”

TMZ obtained screenshots yesterday of the Facebook debate, which began when a Facebook user and former classmate of the Palin girls named Tre posted a status update that said, “Sarah Palin’s Alaska, is soo failing hard right now.” Willow Palin responded, “Don’t watch it dumb shit” and Bristol Palin wrote,  “You’re running your mouth just to talk shit .”

Tre replied with, “Willow, don’t make me count to three” and a boy name Matt wrote, “not as fat as Bristol … The only program I enjoyed from your family is Nailin’ Palin.”

It is around this point Willow jumped in to criticize those “friends” lashing out at her and her family, calling one, Matt, “s0 gay” and another, Tre, a “faggot.”

Tre went on to call Willow “hella ignorant” and say, “Your mom’s show sucks, just get over it. I’ll post whatever the f*ck I want about it on MY Facebook….& sorry Bristol, we can’ all live fail lives because you got pregnant when you were 17ha we all can’t get lucky and have our mom’s be the gov. and you getting on talk shows because your pre-marital sex.”

Toward the end of the spat, Matt wrote, directed at Bristol Palin, “B*tch if I remember right you were grabbin my a** in wrestling practice…I know I dont have a kid, maybe because I know what a f*cking condom is.”

The news outlets that have written about this story have attributed anti-gay views and bigotry to Willow Palin, a minor, but none have questioned Facebook user Matt’s comments calling the Palin daughters a slur for a prostitute.

Mario Ruiz, vice president of media relations at The Huffington Post, wrote in an e-mail to The Daily Caller, “Huffpost exercises caution when reporting on minors. In the case of the widely-reported remarks made by Willow Palin on her Facebook page, HuffPost editors considered Palin’s age as well as the story’s newsworthiness, in addition to her public profile, including her on-screen participation in a reality show, ‘Sarah Palin’s Alaska,’ before deciding to cover and link to TMZ’s story.”

In January 2009, Tina Wells wrote a Huffington Post column condemning the dolls being made of Sasha and Malia Obama. Wells said of the Obama daughters, “They did not ask for the attention and shouldn’t have to maintain an image provided without their, or their parents’, approval…For the most part, President and Mrs. Obama have kept the girls out of the media’s reach, and a situation like this totally violates and exploits them.”


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Front Page News; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: facebook; hatespeech; palin; palinbashing; thoughtcrime; willow; willowpalin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-91 last
To: dsc

Agree. Dont think the Palins can use that excuse though.


51 posted on 11/18/2010 1:27:25 PM PST by Bailee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Scarpetta

“Bristol and her sister are probably fed up with what’s being said about their entire family”.
True...but they need to conduct themselves with grace and integrity for the sake of their mother.
Turning the other cheek isn’t easy when someone is attacking those you love and care about,,but that’s exactly what these girls should have done.

Sarah should take a page from Michele Bachmann’s playbook. The latter is super cautious about what she says and does in public so as not to break any ethics rules. I doubt that any of her kids do or say things that might embarrass their mother.
They are a terrific family.


52 posted on 11/18/2010 1:31:01 PM PST by Mountain Mary ("Excuse me, excuse me, excuse me, young people" ...BO at Conn. rally)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: indoor girl

I agree with you, indoor girl, and am not afraid to say that I hope Cuda doesn’t run.
If she does, I believe that we can plan on watching President Clinton(no, not that one) or President Bambi for four more years.


53 posted on 11/18/2010 1:33:09 PM PST by Mountain Mary ("Excuse me, excuse me, excuse me, young people" ...BO at Conn. rally)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: onedoug

Good gosh.


54 posted on 11/18/2010 1:37:31 PM PST by windcliff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Clump

This discussion is really ridiculous.

Every kid knows that “faggot” is just a synonym for “poopyhead.”


55 posted on 11/18/2010 1:38:13 PM PST by Palladin (Bristol Palin is America's Sweetheart!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Mountain Mary


It looks like Karl Rove has unleashed the Romneybots already.
56 posted on 11/18/2010 1:38:42 PM PST by jimbo123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Drango

You are sooooooooooooo behind the times. These kids are doing all this by the infamous blackberry. I see my younger relatives sending FB messages from school, the bus stop, shopping ... so far, every place but church. I frankly don’t know why parents are buying the kids blackberries.


57 posted on 11/18/2010 1:40:18 PM PST by EDINVA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Williams

A foul mouth in public is not only encouraged but welcomed on mjsbigblog. But, if you dare criticize the ugly, fat a** on her liberal bias, she will suspend you.

She lives with delusions of grandeur that she is someone important in society because she blogs about AI, DWTS, and Glee. And, of course, she is the nazi police if you dare disagree with her liberal views.


58 posted on 11/18/2010 1:44:36 PM PST by Catsrus (Have)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

IMHO*, Facebook is more trouble than it’s worth.

As the Mom, Sarah should lay down the law that no one in the family use or access Facebook for anything.

This would mean that Sarah would have to “give up” her Facebook account. No biggie. I’m sure and of the blogging sites would welcome her and her traffic with open arms.

* Please bear in mind that I’m a curmudgeon.


59 posted on 11/18/2010 1:48:06 PM PST by upchuck (When excerpting please use the entire 300 words we are allowed. No more one or two sentence posts!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

Sorry, but those girls are stigmatizing themselves as trash.

No facebook for my kids. No google, no gmail, no youtube, no yahoo, no chat, either.

We have a proxy web server with a whitelist of web sites and our own mail server.

All email entering and exiting the house is copied to my account.

With nine children, there’s no other way to restrict or monitor their internet activity, other than forbidding it altogether and pulling the plug.


60 posted on 11/18/2010 2:14:30 PM PST by Westbrook (Having children does not divide your love, it multiplies it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Scarpetta

I wonder if it’s some fool CLAIMING to be Bristol and Willow Palin.....imposters? How do we know for sure?


61 posted on 11/18/2010 2:17:29 PM PST by july4thfreedomfoundation ("This is our moment, this is our movement, this is our morning in America!" Sarah Palin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

Why in the hell do they have Facebook accounts? They should delete them. End of story.


62 posted on 11/18/2010 2:18:06 PM PST by mojitojoe (In itÂ’s 1600 years of existence, Islam has 2 main accomplishments, psychotic violence and goat curr)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: indoor girl
this is just one more reason I have very serious doubts.

I have serious doubts about anyone who has been even semi-conscious for the past couple of decades, and still does not recognize the nature and magnitude of this political, cultural, economic war being waged against normal American citizens, day in, day out.

The commie mutant pinhead zombies want you dead. They want your children dead. They want you and your children to suffer mightily until you are all dead.

This is not a simple difference of opinion.

63 posted on 11/18/2010 2:19:11 PM PST by meadsjn (Sarah 2012, or sooner)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: RobRoy
> Y’know, that “teabagger” thing bugs me. It’s pretty apparent that people are using it in some sort of sexual reference, but my imagination is apparently not broad enough to know what it means in that context. And no, I’m not googling it. I don’t want to know.

You're right, don't google it, at least not without "Safe Search" turned on.

Here's something I find curiously ironic. There is both a sexual context, and also a competitive/combat context, and in both of them the teabagger is in the dominant role -- indeed, in the competitive/combat context, the teabagger is demonstrating dominance by humiliating his beaten opponent in a particularly impolite manner.

So those Dems and other leftists who use "teabagger" as a pejorative for members of the Tea Party are actually handing them a compliment (of sorts). They are saying the Tea Party is dominant -- successful at humiliating its foes!

But of course, given the sexual context, and the impolite nature of the competitive/combat context, it's very unlikely that the Tea Party will ever embrace that usage. :)

64 posted on 11/18/2010 2:20:01 PM PST by dayglored (Listen, strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Bringbackthedraft

Yup, definitely a tingle for the leftists with such news. I imagine that the media will go into full meltdown and implode when SP announces her run (if she decides to). ‘Flinging sh!t’ is right.


65 posted on 11/18/2010 2:21:20 PM PST by cweese (Hook 'em Horns!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: ThePatrioticArtist

I tried facebook for 6 months or so...I often found myself wondering aloud why I should give a crap about what my facebook friends were up to every 5 min. That, coupled with the privacy issues I gave it up.


66 posted on 11/18/2010 2:24:25 PM PST by cweese (Hook 'em Horns!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

Ok, I’ve made the rounds of the Leftist enablers — Schlocker, HuffPuff, the DUmmies, Daily POS — and there’s only one useful, new takeaway ... Nov. 2 finally woke these PDSr’s up to the better-than-50% likelihood of Palin winning in 2012 ...


67 posted on 11/18/2010 2:26:07 PM PST by StAnDeliver (/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: meadsjn

Fully awake here. Would it even penetrate if I said I understand and believe with every cell in my body exactly what you’re saying? I’m not a Palin hater, not even a Palin dis-liker, but only the semi-conscious won’t see she’s not perfect. My point was, I don’t respect her parenting because I have seen it in action, on stage, on TV, and crazy me, it bothers me. I didn’t say I wouldn’t vote for her. Man. I get it. I just don’t want another six years of this. And if I’m sick of it, it worries me scores of other voters are sick enough of it, she won’t get elected.


68 posted on 11/18/2010 2:40:29 PM PST by indoor girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

so the left doubles down on stupid and goes after Palin’s children again. what’s next? Using Piper’s essay form 4th grade?

these people need to get a freaking life.


69 posted on 11/18/2010 2:56:33 PM PST by unseen1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: indoor girl

oh stuff it.


70 posted on 11/18/2010 2:58:51 PM PST by unseen1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: dsc

yeah right. Willow was doing nothing but defending her family. Give it a rest. Facebook is a tool to communicate. The fact it is used for shouting matches by 16 year olds is nothing new. this has been going on sinc e time began.


71 posted on 11/18/2010 3:01:25 PM PST by unseen1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

I really don’t see what the big deal is these two libs sound like absolute aholes. They must get a lot of crap from their classmates and that’s sad so I can totally see why they would lash out like that. But, while I think the Palins are just acting like your average American teens they will need to learn that they will be under constant scrutiny. I’m sure Sarah and Todd will explain that to them.


72 posted on 11/18/2010 3:03:38 PM PST by erod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: indoor girl
Palin's parenting is not the issue. I'd say she is doing no worse in most respects than any other parent, and much better in other respects. Her children are just two years ahead of most others.

The real issue here is that the whole Palin family is on the front lines in this war, from the youngest children to the grandparents. Through their experiences, we should be learning the kind of enemy we and all our children will eventually have to face and fight. Martyrdom is for suckers and losers. There is no neutral ground, and every man, woman, and child will have to fight.

The children of millions of other families are already, or soon will be, also engaged in this war. There will be profanity, vicious language, thrown objects, and eventually many, many dead bodies; old, young, and in between; of all sizes, shapes, and colors.

I doubt that parenting skills will be discussed during the intermissions.

73 posted on 11/18/2010 3:08:38 PM PST by meadsjn (Sarah 2012, or sooner)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: july4thfreedomfoundation

Because Bristol and Willow have both publically apologized for this incident.


74 posted on 11/18/2010 3:09:28 PM PST by Responsibility2nd (Yes, as a matter of fact, what you do in your bedroom IS my business.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: indoor girl

What’s worse, the Enquirer is ready to publish an article announcing that Willow is pregnant.....yellow journalism? Maybe, but they’ve been right before.


75 posted on 11/18/2010 3:11:33 PM PST by mdmathis6 (True enlightenment occurs when one discovers just how much like God, one is NOT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Clump
I'll bet there isn't a homo in this country my security detail can't kick the snot out of.

8^D

76 posted on 11/18/2010 3:24:45 PM PST by Gargantua (I prefer a Shitake reduction with butter, sauterne, a pinch of basil and balsamic)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: indoor girl

I agree, and I like Palin. However, this next election 2012 is not right time for her to run, because she has a family that has been harrassed, embarrassed and damaged. There should be family counseling in preparation for a run in 2016 or 2020 depending on cirumstances for her and country.
America needs in 2012 a candidate beyond reproach, and who will be able to focus on issues, and not be as polarizing as Bush or Palin...both of whom I really like. This country cannot afford to have Obama win in 2012. NOT Romney, Gingrich or McCain...PLEASE find someone who can stand the scrutiny, speak well, and have a good voting record, and no family history that is ripe for the left media.

Make the media dig for a story on the Conservative side, and Sarah Palin is a good bulldog on the outside, and can stump well for candidates. It is a much better place for her right now, and she has money to wait it out now. Her family like all families with several teens needs some time to be together, and find out how to act in public arena.


77 posted on 11/18/2010 3:27:33 PM PST by Kackikat (There is no such thing as a free lunch, because someone paid, somewhere.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: indoor girl
"It DOES matter how she parents."

Right. No "good parent" has kids who sneak postings onto the computer when they're giving a speech to 30,000 people in Lexington, or flying to a fundraiser in Tallahassee.

< snickering at you >

Here're two clues you can get:

1) Many homely women will not vote for Palin out of feline jealousy or temporary hormonal imbalance.

2) Like she's going to need your vote? Get a life.

8^D

78 posted on 11/18/2010 3:32:18 PM PST by Gargantua (I prefer a Shitake reduction with butter, sauterne, a pinch of basil and balsamic)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Noamie
“the younger generation has totally different meaning for the term, “faggot” than we do.”

I saw a show recently called “Louie K.C.” or some such. He said it this way (paraphrase)

“I would NEVER call a gay person a ‘faggot’ unless he said something totally gay. I mean he could be s*&$^%#& a c*#$, and I wouldn't call him that, but if he stopped and started saying a bunch of faggy things I would tell him “Stop being a fag and go back to s*$&%^# that c*^%.””.

79 posted on 11/18/2010 3:33:54 PM PST by allmendream (Tea Party did not send the GOP to D.C. to negotiate the terms of our surrender to socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Mountain Mary
Pull the stick out of the crink and whip it at the ape-boy. You'll get no reward in this life, but in the next, people will actually care what you have to say.

Remember, whip the crink-stick at the ape-boy. There's a good girl.

:^O

80 posted on 11/18/2010 3:37:59 PM PST by Gargantua (I prefer a Shitake reduction with butter, sauterne, a pinch of basil and balsamic)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

Here is one of the many screenshots that I got of Bristol’s Facebook page.
http://efreephoto.com/image-16604474294ce433132e382.htm

Calling her brother a ‘re re’, and Sarah a whore. Where are you TMZ? Not present.


81 posted on 11/18/2010 4:08:11 PM PST by ReneeLynn (Socialism is SO yesterday. Fascism, it*s the new black. Mmm Mmm Mmm.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: indoor girl; meadsjn
My point was, I don’t respect her parenting because I have seen it in action, on stage, on TV, and crazy me, it bothers me.

Let me chime in here. I saw the first episode on the TLC repeat last night and I have to agree with indoor girl. The family was being filmed and all knew it. First the boyfriend disobeys her and sneaks up the stairs when he thinks Sarah isn't looking. She calls Willow on her cell phone (from downstairs to upstairs) and tells her to send him back down. The boy comes down and sits on the couch as of nothing happens. She doesn't say a word to him as if it didn't happen. She should have sent him home and then dealt with Willow who also had been told no boys upstairs.

Later in the family RV the girls are fighting and acting up, just being bratty and talking back to her. They are old enough to know better and it doesn't paint a pretty picture of Sarah's parenting skills and certainly doesn't endear the viewer to the family. So I wouldn't be a bit surprised if Willow turns up pregnant.

82 posted on 11/18/2010 4:41:41 PM PST by CedarDave (Tagline being updated...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

Well, in that case, since Willow is underage, and under Sarah’s roof, Sarah and/or Todd should toss Willow’s computer into Lake Lucille.


83 posted on 11/18/2010 6:13:33 PM PST by july4thfreedomfoundation ("This is our moment, this is our movement, this is our morning in America!" Sarah Palin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Kackikat

“and not be as polarizing as Bush or Palin”

Polarizing? You don’t want to be on the opposite pole from Evil?

If a candidate doesn’t drive the leftards into a slavering, convulsing, howling, puking, chewing-their-own-lips-off, full-blown “Exorcist” seizure, that candidate is not morally fit for office.

This is war, pooky. They want you dead. They might let you live as a slave, just so they’d have somebody to torment.

These people are capital “E” Evil. They are not to be “worked with” or appeased. Nothing less than total victory is remotely adequate, and that means that they have absolutely *no* voice in anything.

Polarizing? I am astounded that someone who purports to be a conservative would be reluctant to offend the vile scoundrels that have laid seige to the freedom of the human race.


84 posted on 11/19/2010 12:16:07 AM PST by dsc (Any attempt to move a government to the left is a crime against humanity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: Gargantua

I must say something...well...I will keep it to myself. Not that it isn’t fit to print...but I doubt you would ‘get it’ anyway.


85 posted on 11/19/2010 7:57:42 AM PST by Sistyelder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: dsc

Obviously you don’t understand, and are just like the Anarchists on the other side, buzzhead. Of course we want them acting as you said, but our candidate must not have acted like an idiot, and done things that can be PERCEIVED as unfit for service!

We need stable, and clean candidates, whose mental health or children’s actions we won’t be questioning later! For example the best candidates are people like Pence, Boehner, Cantor or DeMint....or someone focused on the issues WITHOUT THE BAGGAGE.

People who have questionable pasts or behaviors like MA Obamacare by Mitt Romney, or Gingrich, who had affairs, and had to resign as Speaker...that’s okay for Clinton, but not for a conservative candidate for President, although Gingrich has done a great service in his writing, and as a spokesperson on Fox.

I promoted Bush in 2000 and 2004, and I think he was a very good President, until last two years, but he was tired or set up by marxists against capitalism, terrorists, natural disasters , fires in CA, then 2008 Lehman, Paulson, and FDIC act to let Obama Win...and he did not see it coming. I haven’t read the book yet, so I won’t comment on that any further.

I agree that Palin is a great Conservative, but we need to be drawing attention to Obama’s mistakes and lies as President (but I’d rather see him impeached) during 2012 election. It is hard to unseat a current President in second election. Conservatives need to be making a list of his mistakes for ads.

I voted for Palin... not McCain, however her family will suffer greatly, if she runs in 2012, and don’t you care about that? Every single thing they have done since last election has been documented and scrutinized by every leftist journalist out there, just in case she runs.

Palin has a huge voice in the next election, and is untouchable as a private citizen, but if she runs it will be political suicide for her, for the left the gloves come off. It will be all about her and her family, not the issues, policies or things that need to be done. It will give Obama the advantage.
.
Just because you don’t like what I said doesn’t make it any less valid.


86 posted on 11/19/2010 12:11:07 PM PST by Kackikat (There is no such thing as a free lunch, because someone paid, somewhere.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: Kackikat

“buzzhead.”

Bite me.

“our candidate must not have acted like an idiot”

Palin has not acted like an idiot.

“done things that can be PERCEIVED as unfit for service”

Concern with perceptions is being used by the demonrats to intimidate the pubbies into eating their own young. Perceptions are not reality, they are the deception of the feeble-minded.

“We need stable, and clean candidates, whose mental health or children’s actions we won’t be questioning later!”

1. What kind of leftist troll would suggest that anyone would question Governor Palin’s mental health? Get back to DU, commie. As far as children go, the demonrats will invent stuff if they can’t find anything.

2. Show me just one elected demonrat who isn’t a serial felon. Show me just one who doesn’t have enough baggage to sink a battleship. Great googly moogly, Barney Fag was running a sodomite whorehouse out of his basement, and that scoundrel has never even come close to losing. The pubbies will always be losers until they man up and learn to tell the demonrats to kiss their butts.

“For example the best candidates are people like Pence, Boehner, Cantor or DeMint....or someone focused on the issues WITHOUT THE BAGGAGE.”

Every one of those politicians has skeletons in his closet. Bet on it. Further, no candidate who is acceptable to the RINO elite is morally fit to hold office.

“People who have questionable pasts or behaviors”

So, you’re saying that Governor Palin has had affairs, and has advocated socialized medicine? Or are you just hoping that if you fling enough baboon sh*t something will stick?

“I promoted Bush…but he was set up…and he did not see it coming.”

That was apparent two weeks into his first term.

“I agree that Palin is a great Conservative, but we need to be drawing attention to Obama’s mistakes and lies as President (but I’d rather see him impeached) during 2012 election.”

That is a total non sequitur. There is no conflict between the premises that Governor Palin is a great conservative and that we should be speaking the truth about the Bamtard.

“It is hard to unseat a current President in second election. Conservatives need to be making a list of his mistakes for ads.”

Ads aren’t enough. Conservatives need to be pamphleteering, publishing underground newspapers, knocking on doors, confronting demonrats in the street and busting up their rallies and demonstrations, distributing DVDs with watchable conservative content…and whatever else the left did to get where they are today.

“however her family will suffer greatly, if she runs in 2012, and don’t you care about that?”

Once again, bite me. What a cheap, low-life ruse.

Oh, wait, I see your point: Because the leftards are despicable scoundrels who abuse the children of Stupid Party candidates, no Republican should ever run for anything.

Troll.

“Every single thing they have done since last election has been documented and scrutinized by every leftist journalist out there, just in case she runs.”

Right, and the solution is to curl up in the corner and tremble in fear.

Road apples. The demonrats must be made to pay for their contemptible behavior. They must be punished. The solution is not pre-emptive surrender. The solution is to drive them from the field by any means necessary (other than the intrinsically evil).

“if she runs it will be political suicide for her”

Let’s see now, who was it that was in terror of a Palin candidacy and would do anything to stop it? Oh, yeah, the left.

“It will give Obama the advantage.”

Road apples. The other demonrats won’t allow him to run again. I just hope he has enough sense to step down peacefully, so they don’t have to kill him.

“Just because you don’t like what I said doesn’t make it any less valid.”

No, it is invalidated by the fact that it is either (1) leftard propaganda, or (2) deeply stupid.


87 posted on 11/19/2010 3:14:21 PM PST by dsc (Any attempt to move a government to the left is a crime against humanity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: dsc

LOL you sure do think you know everything. Go rant somewhere else.


88 posted on 11/19/2010 5:44:13 PM PST by Kackikat (There is no such thing as a free lunch, because someone paid, somewhere.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: indoor girl

Lord, don’t let dsc read that, I’ve already been blasted for voicing my opinion.


89 posted on 11/19/2010 5:50:17 PM PST by Kackikat (There is no such thing as a free lunch, because someone paid, somewhere.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: dsc

“our candidate must not have acted like an idiot”

“Palin has not acted like an idiot.”

MAYBE you should go back to school, and learn the difference between a general statement, and a specific one. That also goes for the ‘mental health’ statement, because neither one was addressing Palin, it was a general statement about a future candidate.

For someone who claims to know so much, it appears reading comprehension is a problem for you.


90 posted on 11/19/2010 5:53:54 PM PST by Kackikat (There is no such thing as a free lunch, because someone paid, somewhere.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

This is not the first time I’ve received a crass, inappropriate response from Gargantua.
He is not abiding by the rules of the forum and I would appreciate your addressing this issue, for the sake of other Freepers. Thanks, MM.


91 posted on 11/19/2010 6:22:24 PM PST by Mountain Mary ("Excuse me, excuse me, excuse me, young people" ...BO at Conn. rally)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-91 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson