Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rebuilding the House (Tom McClintock)
The Hill, Washington, DC ^ | 2010-11-09 | U.S. Rep. Tom McClintock, R-California, 4th District

Posted on 11/20/2010 3:07:16 PM PST by rabscuttle385

More than a year ago, Pollster Frank Luntz stood before a group of about 40 House Republicans in a cramped conference room. “I need to tell you something,” he said. “I’ve been looking at polling data from Congressional districts across America for the last three months. I’m convinced that you are going to be in the majority next year.” After a long pause, he added, “This time, please don’t screw it up again.”

I don’t think we will.

The message of the last two elections could not be louder or clearer. Great parties are built upon great principles and they are judged by their devotion to those principles. From its inception, the core principles of the Republican party have been individual freedom and constitutionally limited government. The closer it has hewn to these principles, the better it has done. The further it has strayed from them…well, my God!

In the aftermath of the Bush debacle, House Republican leaders resolved to restore traditional Republican principles as the policy and political focus of the party and they achieved something no one at the time thought possible: they united House Republicans as a determined voice of opposition to the Left and rallied the American people. Republicans rediscovered why they were Republicans, and Republican leaders rediscovered Reagan’s advice to paint our positions in bold colors and not hide them in pale pastels.

(Ironically, in Reagan’s home state, Republicans tried to campaign to the left of the Democrats and the result was disastrous. While the rest of the country was celebrating historic Republican gains -- including a shift of at least 61 U.S. House seats, 6 U.S. Senate seats, 680 state legislative seats, 19 state legislatures and six governors -- the statewide Republican ticket in California imploded. Republicans nationally now hold more state legislative seats than in any year since 1928. In California, they hold fewer than at any time since 1978!

House Republicans were unfairly criticized as the party of “No.” When somebody is driving you off a cliff, “no” is a handy word to have in your vocabulary. But it can’t be the only word in the national debate over the future of the country and Republicans know it.

Over the last two years, House Republicans laid out detailed plans to revive the finances of our government and the prosperity of our economy, to return freedom of choice, competition and affordability to health care, to restore the integrity of our borders, and to return to our states their rightful powers and prerogatives.

A Republican House cannot alone enact such laws, but it no longer must labor in the obscurity of minority irrelevance. It now has the opportunity to elevate the national debate by putting forward these plans at a time when Americans are alert to the danger facing the nation and eager for an adult discussion about the fundamental mechanics of freedom – how freedom works and how we can put it back to work.

In 1858, Lincoln warned the nation that two antithetical philosophies, freedom and slavery, competed for the future and reminded us that a house divided against itself cannot stand. “I do not believe the house will fall,” he said, “but I do believe that it will cease to be divided.” Today two incompatible philosophies, freedom and socialism, compete for our future and the stage is set for one of the greatest debates in the history of the American Republic.

Upon the outcome of that debate rests the question of whether the United States of America will fade inexorably into history or whether it will begin its next great era of expansion, prosperity and influence.

Rep. Tom McClintock was first elected to the California 4th Congressional District by a margin of 1,800 votes in 2008 and re-elected by a margin of 70,000 votes in 2010.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Editorial; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: gop; house; mcclintock; realconservatives; rebuilding; republican; republicans; tommcclintock

1 posted on 11/20/2010 3:07:18 PM PST by rabscuttle385
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl

fyi


2 posted on 11/20/2010 3:07:43 PM PST by rabscuttle385 (Live Free or Die)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385; calcowgirl; NormsRevenge; ExTexasRedhead; bamahead; Zanton; Impy; fieldmarshaldj

McClintock is one of the good ones. I also hope that Republicans don’t blow it again, either.


3 posted on 11/20/2010 3:13:42 PM PST by Clintonfatigued (Illegal aliens commit crimes that Americans won't commit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

Before I moved from California I worked on Tom’s campaign and Dan Lungren’s. Dan was an architect of the three strikes you are out policy when he was state DA and is now also a congressman.

These two are rare bright spots in CA politics.


4 posted on 11/20/2010 3:21:14 PM PST by cicero2k
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385
Too bad McClintock is not immediately elevated to a position of partisan leadership in the congress.

In the mean time, locals are sending village idiots (blue dogs) like Dennis Cardoza (CA 18) and Jim Costa (CA 20) to become minority leaders on committees.

5 posted on 11/20/2010 3:24:52 PM PST by Amerigomag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

One of the few politicians who actually seems to understand what average everyday regular people do in the lives. And he tries to keep government off our backs.


6 posted on 11/20/2010 3:26:46 PM PST by Clock King (Ellisworth Toohey was right: My head's gonna explode.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

After a long pause, he added, “This time, please don’t screw it up again.”

The first one that utters the words, Bipartisan, compromise, across the aisle. Is the next to go down. Hatch you are going down anyway. Just because I want to dance on your political grave, singing hallelujah. I think we are great at taking out our own, I suggest we do it every election.


7 posted on 11/20/2010 3:30:33 PM PST by Walkingfeather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385
Great parties are built upon great principles and composed of venal men.
8 posted on 11/20/2010 3:32:52 PM PST by arthurus (Read Hazlitt's "Economics In One Lesson.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

The CAGOP is dead.

After their picking Red Arnold, you’d think it would learn its lesson and re-embrace conservatism. It didn’t.

Even Reagan couldn’t save the party there today.


9 posted on 11/20/2010 3:33:20 PM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Walkingfeather

That will probably be McCain.


10 posted on 11/20/2010 3:34:07 PM PST by arthurus (Read Hazlitt's "Economics In One Lesson.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

calinfornia-RIP


11 posted on 11/20/2010 3:34:53 PM PST by personalaccts (Is George W going to protect the border?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: arthurus

His favorite women, Meg Whitman and Carly Fiorina, whom he endorsed and campaigned for and who ran to the Left of the Democrats - lost. When you nominate RINOs, you always lose.


12 posted on 11/20/2010 3:37:01 PM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued
McClintock is one of the good ones.

My first political donation ever was to Tom McClintock when he was senator in CA in 2001 and I have never lived in CA.

He's a good man!

13 posted on 11/20/2010 3:39:00 PM PST by EGPWS (Trust in God, question everyone else)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

If Tom has his way, there will be no screw ups, and the House will move steadily forward with conservative policy.


14 posted on 11/20/2010 4:24:40 PM PST by Navy Patriot (Sarah and the Conservatives will rock your world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385; All
“This time, please don’t screw it up again.”

The Meaning of the Recent Elections

In the two most recent elections, each political party was soundly, sequentially rejected, but for different reasons. Simply and bluntly:

* The Republicans were tossed out because they did not govern according to their principles.
* The Democrats were tossed out because they did govern according to their principles.
One party lost because it misbehaved; the other because it revealed itself.

-- from THIS article

15 posted on 11/20/2010 4:31:38 PM PST by FreeKeys (Remember the Pilgrims tried communism, failed, tried private farm plots & enjoyed bountiful harvests)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Amerigomag
Jim Costa (CA 20)

He's they guy whose name you see on all the 'we need water to feed the state' banners along I-5 thru the San Joaquin Valley, right?

16 posted on 11/20/2010 4:42:34 PM PST by ErnBatavia (It's not the Obama Administration....it's the "Obama Regime".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385; afnamvet; ALOHA RONNIE; ambrose; antceecee; atomic_dog; AVNevis; B4Ranch; b9; ...

PING!

McClintock Ping List
Freepmail me if you want on or off this list


17 posted on 11/20/2010 5:15:11 PM PST by calcowgirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreeKeys

Good addition to this thread. Thanks for that ping the other day.


18 posted on 11/20/2010 5:22:16 PM PST by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: FreeKeys

That is genius. Succinct and completely spot-on, impossible to misunderstand, impossible to argue against by anyone with any honesty whatsoever. Thanks for the quote and link.


19 posted on 11/20/2010 5:35:44 PM PST by FreedomPoster (No Representation without Taxation!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385; calcowgirl; PGalt; FreeKeys; goldstategop

McClintock’s great........... but is not selling himself well.

How come Tom’s never on various Fox News programs - Hannity Greta etc?

Michele Bachmann, Newt, Palin, others are there just about every day.

McClintock REALLY needs to get on Fox more frequently if he wants to be President someday.

He’s practically HIDING at this point. NOT GOOD FOR HIM!
Comeon Tom, get OUT there~


20 posted on 11/20/2010 6:11:59 PM PST by 4Liberty ( How do you spell "moral hazard"?: $ 19, 0 0 0, 0 0 0, 0 0 0, 0 0 0.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

Now that the House, in January, will have the majority I expect nothing. Absolution nothing.


21 posted on 11/20/2010 6:14:07 PM PST by Logical me
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Amerigomag

Actually, McClintock is making a name for himself by being himself. He doesn’t need a ‘leadership’ post. And, he’s probably better off without one. Being part of the ‘in crowd’ has its own drawbacks.


22 posted on 11/20/2010 6:18:13 PM PST by EDINVA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: 4Liberty
McClintock is great, but he's not telegenic. He has, as they say, a face for radio -- a medium he does quite well on.

The problem with McClintock is his eyes, they look like they're each staring at something different. It's a bit unnerving looking at McClintock on TV.

-PJ

23 posted on 11/20/2010 6:26:21 PM PST by Political Junkie Too ("Comprehensive" reform bills only end up as incomprehensible messes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

Wish he could have been our Gov


24 posted on 11/20/2010 6:26:53 PM PST by Rusty0604
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Political Junkie Too

As a fellow ‘face for radio’, can’t help but agree.


25 posted on 11/20/2010 6:49:22 PM PST by BenKenobi (Don’t worry about being effective. Just concentrate on being faithful to the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Political Junkie Too
"McClintock is great, but he's not telegenic. He has, as they say, a face for radio -- a medium he does quite well on. The problem with McClintock is his eyes, they look like they're each staring at something different. It's a bit unnerving looking at McClintock on TV"

He's a nice looking man, but I do know what you're talking about with his eyes. He does well on TV as long as they have him in a side shot like they did in this video from last year, but face on, he's a little scary. (The first few minutes of the video he talks about H1N1, then he talks about the healthcare bill and Afghanistan.)

26 posted on 11/20/2010 7:18:28 PM PST by Bokababe (Save Christian Kosovo! http://www.savekosovo.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: All

27 posted on 11/20/2010 7:25:54 PM PST by Bokababe (Save Christian Kosovo! http://www.savekosovo.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl

Thank you!


28 posted on 11/20/2010 7:40:48 PM PST by hedgetrimmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Bokababe; calcowgirl; ElkGroveDan; Grampa Dave; tubebender; hedgetrimmer; forester
What? You expect our intellectually honest conservative leaders to ALL be perfect looking publicity hounds on power grabbing missions?

George Herbert Walker Bush used to say it was "that vision thing." I'd sure put Tom's vision up against most anyone's in the GOP, wouldn't you???

His eyes have to be that way for his secret "over the horizon" political vision capability!!!

29 posted on 11/20/2010 7:43:11 PM PST by SierraWasp (I want my next President to be Sarah! She beats the pants offa the dude in there now!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: ErnBatavia
Yup. One in the same. The guy who won't lift a finger to oppose the non-native, minnow preservation wackos.

Costa ranches on the east side of the valley were water comes from pumping the underground. No minnows down there.

30 posted on 11/20/2010 8:41:54 PM PST by Amerigomag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: SierraWasp
LOL!

-PJ

31 posted on 11/20/2010 8:46:27 PM PST by Political Junkie Too ("Comprehensive" reform bills only end up as incomprehensible messes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl

I would like to be ON the McClintock ping list, thank you.


32 posted on 11/20/2010 9:22:18 PM PST by Freedom_Is_Not_Free (TSA apologists deserve neither Liberty nor Safety - Ben Franklin, 2010. END the TSA.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl

I would like to be ON the McClintock ping list, thank you.


33 posted on 11/20/2010 9:22:53 PM PST by Freedom_Is_Not_Free (TSA apologists deserve neither Liberty nor Safety - Ben Franklin, 2010. END the TSA.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: SierraWasp

Hey, get off the crusading horse. I love the guy, he’s my Rep. I’d elect him POTUS if I could because I don’t care about that stuff. But most people do and someone who doesn’t know him would hold it against him. We live in a very superficial age.


34 posted on 11/20/2010 9:31:13 PM PST by Bokababe (Save Christian Kosovo! http://www.savekosovo.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385
Tom McClintock was a “Tea Party” Republican before their was a “Tea Party”
35 posted on 11/20/2010 10:27:43 PM PST by tophat9000 (.............................. BP + BO = BS ...........................Formula for a disaster...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

“His favorite women, Meg Whitman and Carly Fiorina, whom he endorsed and campaigned for and who ran to the Left of the Democrats - lost.”

They did NOT run to the left of their democrat opponents, both of whom were essentially incumbents.

You think DeVore would have done better than Fiorina, when he couldn’t win the (closed) primary?

Palin was right supporting Fiorina. She had the best chance, in an uphill situation.


36 posted on 11/20/2010 11:29:33 PM PST by truth_seeker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl

BTTT


37 posted on 11/21/2010 3:15:33 AM PST by E.G.C.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Bokababe; SierraWasp
We live in a very superficial age.

It almost makes you long for the days of Nixon. What a looker he was! LOL

38 posted on 11/21/2010 12:19:33 PM PST by calcowgirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Freedom_Is_Not_Free

You’ve been added to the list.
(It’s a rather infrequent ping list - but worth it.)


39 posted on 11/21/2010 12:20:27 PM PST by calcowgirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

When I met him in person, I thought him a rather handsome man and a fiery orator. He will stand up for rural people, against over-regulation of the natural resource industries and for responsible use of our public lands. Look forward to his contributions to the House Natural Resources Committee Republicans http://republicans.resourcescommittee.house.gov/ We are lucky to have him.


40 posted on 11/21/2010 12:30:17 PM PST by marsh2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl
It almost makes you long for the days of Nixon. What a looker he was! LOL

LOL! Yeah, a real beaut!

But Nixon lost in 1960, not long after a TV debate where he had refused make-up and started to sweat when verbally sparring with a cool, collected and handsome JFK.

41 posted on 11/21/2010 1:51:35 PM PST by Bokababe (Save Christian Kosovo! http://www.savekosovo.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: truth_seeker; goldstategop

Cornyn & Co. went out and recruited Carly and put all the energy and money behind her. Ditto with the CA GOP “leadership.” It is hardly an “open primary”, i.e. a choice of the voters, when the party stacks the deck in favor of one candidate over another.

As to Fiorina, she was on the wrong side of all of today’s issues. Extension of unemployment benefits, DREAM Act, START Treaty, repealing Don’t Ask Don’t Tell, and on and on. She may as well have run as a Democrat.


42 posted on 11/21/2010 1:58:19 PM PST by calcowgirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Bokababe
... a cool, collected and handsome JFK

On looks, I'd vote for Tom over JFK anyday.

  

Something about those Kennedy mouths. Eeeek.

Reminds me of Little Red Riding Hood and the wolf... "My, what big teeth you have..."

43 posted on 11/21/2010 2:12:19 PM PST by calcowgirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl
My Father was a JFK Clone, his teeth were supplied by The University Of Utah football team.
44 posted on 11/21/2010 2:16:41 PM PST by Little Bill (Harry Browne is a Poofter.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl
On looks, I'd vote for Tom over JFK anyday.

I agree. I never thought JFK was handsome for precisely the reason you mentioned, but everyone else seemed to. (Same with Clinton.)

I like Tom better than JFK in EVERY way, including looks. But I wasn't the one who brought up "the eye thing". It was, however something that I had noticed, too. People like you to look them in the eye and it makes them feel uncomfortable when you don't -- or can't.

45 posted on 11/21/2010 2:20:39 PM PST by Bokababe (Save Christian Kosovo! http://www.savekosovo.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Little Bill
My Father was a JFK Clone

I'm so sorry! ;-)

just kidding - I hope you meant in looks, only. :-)

46 posted on 11/21/2010 2:34:34 PM PST by calcowgirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl

A movement to draft McClintock for VP in 2012 is needed.


47 posted on 11/21/2010 2:47:48 PM PST by rabscuttle385 (Live Free or Die)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl

He was four years older and according friends, a Viking god. My mother, a Black Irish woman, she said, “He Is Mine!” And so, If you don’t Understand Black Irish, a race apart, ain’t religion, he was hers.


48 posted on 11/21/2010 2:54:55 PM PST by Little Bill (Harry Browne is a Poofter.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl

Thanks for the Ping!


49 posted on 11/21/2010 6:34:02 PM PST by Seadog Bytes ("Smart Growth"... isn't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl

Thats good. Tom’s thoughts wouldn’t be worth as much if he wrote a daily blog. I appreciate when he has something to say and he says it. He is right on to me quite often. I voted for him for Governor in 2003, even knowing Arnold would likely win due to his name recognition and Hollywood image. The CA electorate collectively is quite stupid and shallow. Maybe naive is a better word. For whatever reasons, they are politically clueless.


50 posted on 11/22/2010 8:32:22 AM PST by Freedom_Is_Not_Free (TSA apologists deserve neither Liberty nor Safety. END the TSA.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson