Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rasmussen: Many Say Government Now Operating Outside the Constitution [YA THINK???]
Rasmussen Reports ^ | November 23, 2010

Posted on 11/23/2010 9:40:20 AM PST by Constitutionalist Conservative

Voters are clearly dubious about the size and scope of today’s federal government.

A new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey finds that just 39% of Likely U.S. Voters believe the federal government currently operates within the limits established by the Constitution of the United States.

Forty-four percent (44%) disagree and say it is not functioning within those limits, while another 17% aren’t sure. (To see survey question wording, click here.)

Earlier surveys have shown that just one-in-five voters believe that the government today has the consent of the governed. Forty-eight percent (48%) see the government as a threat to individual rights. According to the Declaration of Independence, governments are formed to protect certain inalienable rights.

Most Americans think the Constitution is just fine the way it is and should be left alone. But 39% say the governing document doesn’t put enough restrictions on what the government can do.

As is often the case, there’s a wide gap between the perceptions of the Political Class and those of Mainstream voters when it comes to the federal government. Eighty-three percent (83%) of Political Class voters say the government now operates within constitutional limits, but 62% of those in the Mainstream don’t share that view.

One aspect of the Constitution that is frequently challenged is its protection for freedom of speech. But 85% of voters say, generally speaking, that the constitutional protection of speech is a good thing for the United States. Only six percent (6%) disagree. The survey of 1,000 Likely Voters was conducted on November 21-22, 2010 by Rasmussen Reports. The margin of sampling error is +/- 3 percentage points with a 95% level of confidence. Field work for all Rasmussen Reports surveys is conducted by Pulse Opinion Research, LLC. See methodology.

Nearly two-out-of-three voters (65%) are at least somewhat angry at the current policies of the federal government, including 40% who are Very Angry.

Sixty-one percent (61%) of Democrats say the federal government currently is operating within the limits established by the Constitution. Holding the opposite view, 65% of Republicans and 52% of voters not affiliated with either of the major parties do not believe the government is functioning within constitutional bounds.

But all three groups agree overwhelmingly that the constitutional protection of freedom of speech is a good thing.

Sixty-six percent (66%) of political conservatives say today’s federal government is out-of-bounds constitutionally, but 66% of liberals disagree. By a narrow 43% to 37% margin, moderates think the government is within constitutional guidelines.

In surveys for several years, voters have defended the Constitution and questioned how it is being applied.

Sixty percent (60%) of voters, for example, say the U.S. Supreme Court should make its decisions based on the Constitution and legal precedents rather than being guided by a sense of fairness and justice. But only 38% think the high court is actually guided by the Constitution when it makes its rulings.

Despite continuing gun control efforts by federal, state and local governments, Americans overwhelmingly believe the Constitution guarantees the right of the average citizen to own a gun.

At the same time, most voters (65%) say they prefer a smaller government with lower taxes rather than one with more services and higher taxes.

Most Americans say the government already has too much influence over the economy and is involved in too many things that would be better left to the private sector.

Seventy percent (70%) of voters think big government and big business generally work together against the interests of investors and consumers.

While protective of their freedom of speech rights, most Americans have agreed over the years that they are willing to sacrifice some of that freedom to protect children from indecency.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; Government
KEYWORDS: 2010polls; anticonstitution; constitution; donttreadonme; fascism; liberalfascism; obama
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 next last
To: Constitutionalist Conservative

21 posted on 11/23/2010 11:08:43 AM PST by BenLurkin (This post is not a statement of fact. It is merely a personal opinion -- or humor -- or both)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: johnthebaptistmoore

Probably since, at least, the Jackson administration.


22 posted on 11/23/2010 11:08:43 AM PST by Chuckster (Just trying to figure things out)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: maine-iac7

So here’s what I’m going to do.

I’m going to have a special t-shirt made. It’ll simply have the words of the Fourth Amendment printed on it.

“The right of the people to be secure in their persons... against unreasonable searches and seizures shall not be violated...”

And I’ll just stand there and let them do their groping.

If anyone would like to steal this idea and turn it into a commercial enterprise, feel free. I’m too busy and live too far away from a city to do this myself. I’d buy the shirt, though.


23 posted on 11/23/2010 11:12:13 AM PST by redpoll
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Wow! I really want one of those.

With the t-shirt in a heap at the foot of the bed.


24 posted on 11/23/2010 11:13:46 AM PST by redpoll
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: ExTexasRedhead

That’s why we have the word TREASON!


25 posted on 11/23/2010 11:21:08 AM PST by Bitsy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: HKMk23

Scott’s a little slow, but eventually he ‘get’s it’, usually after the fact. He’s a Monday morning quarterback as far as I’m concerned, referencing candidates and election predictions.


26 posted on 11/23/2010 11:22:11 AM PST by SlightOfTongue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: arista

That was my first thought -

most leftists DESPISE any fixed set of rules because those rules preclude the “discretion” of the “ultra-smart” ruling class.


27 posted on 11/23/2010 11:24:44 AM PST by MrB (The difference between a (de)humanist and a Satanist is that the latter knows who he's working for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ExTexasRedhead

Unfortunately, most Germans and Austrians thought Chancellor Hitler was their savior, the best thing since sliced bread w/butter. Just like the Obots.


28 posted on 11/23/2010 11:24:58 AM PST by 2ndDivisionVet (Every decent man is ashamed of the government he lives under. ~Mencken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Those that could “see” evil growing and taking over bailed out of Germany at the first opportunity. That was why they survived the Holocaust.

We have useful idiots right now that cannot see evil. When they’re dragged before an Obama Death Panel and denied health care and shipped to an Obama Hospice Center to die, they will realize that they made the same mistake as many in Germany did. Just my opinion!


29 posted on 11/23/2010 11:32:22 AM PST by ExTexasRedhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: redpoll
Here ya go $23.95/ea
30 posted on 11/23/2010 11:49:44 AM PST by mc5cents
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: johnthebaptistmoore

“For, exactly, how long has the U.S. government exceeded its constitutional boundaries? That’s the question I want answered.”

Great question. And the answers you’d get would be the most telling.


31 posted on 11/23/2010 12:02:58 PM PST by MichaelCorleone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: MichaelCorleone

Marbury vs Madison anyone?


32 posted on 11/23/2010 12:04:45 PM PST by MrB (The difference between a (de)humanist and a Satanist is that the latter knows who he's working for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: ExTexasRedhead
Yes we are being ruled and run into the ground by an intellectual egomaniac dedicated to Islam and Marxism
33 posted on 11/23/2010 12:27:23 PM PST by Armaggedon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: mc5cents

Many thanks! Be well and God bless.


34 posted on 11/23/2010 1:26:44 PM PST by redpoll
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: ExTexasRedhead

No wonder der ‘bamafuhrer wants to build new rail lines!


35 posted on 11/23/2010 1:35:39 PM PST by sheik yerbouty ( Make America and the world a jihad free zone!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Constitutionalist Conservative
The nation's largest organised crime family has been operating outside the Constitution for a very long time. Since when did these people catch on?
36 posted on 11/23/2010 1:39:17 PM PST by BluesDuke (Another brief interlude from the small apartment halfway up in the middle of nowhere in particular)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maine-iac7

So, shut up, keep quiet and just turn on the showers after depositing your clothing in this pile.


37 posted on 11/23/2010 1:58:32 PM PST by Mouton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Constitutionalist Conservative

Drooling idiots who watch TV support Obama when they switch the propaganda tube on. Fools.


38 posted on 11/23/2010 2:27:02 PM PST by Frantzie (Imam Ob*m* & Democrats support the VICTORY MOSQUE & TV supports Imam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid!; AdmSmith; Arthur Wildfire! March; Berosus; bigheadfred; ColdOne; ...

Thanks Constitutionalist Conservative.


39 posted on 11/23/2010 6:49:47 PM PST by SunkenCiv (The 2nd Amendment follows right behind the 1st because some people are hard of hearing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: johnthebaptistmoore
For, exactly, how long has the U.S. government exceeded its constitutional boundaries? That’s the question I want answered.

The answer is, "obviously for too long, and by both Parties."

There is NOTHING "constitutional" about the "Patriot Act," Affirmative Action," federally institutionalized socialism, undeclared wars, "wealth redistribution," and the eligibility of scoff-law Presidents who aren't proven American citizens. But that's just me.

40 posted on 11/23/2010 7:12:45 PM PST by Conservative Tsunami
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson