Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

It's Official--The FCC Will Vote to Take Over the Internet in December
Big Government ^ | November 23, 2010 | Seton Motley

Posted on 11/24/2010 5:58:44 AM PST by PJ-Comix

Just this past Friday, we warned you that a Federal Communications Commission (FCC) December Internet power grab was probably coming.

Well, we now know that it is – and it may be even worse than we thought.

Details have been sketchy, and successive reports often contradictory, but what follows is what seems to be looming over us in December. (We will know for sure on Wednesday, November 24 – if the FCC maintains its current December 15 meeting date.)

FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski appears to be preparing to dramatically increase the FCC’s regulatory role over the Internet (in TWO ways; more on that later).

He is doing so without the necessary Congressional authority – which he himself acknowledges he doesn’t have. And he is doing so by torturing and twisting the regulatory language he is drafting – so as to keep this extraordinary dictatorial seizure within the current Title I confines.

(Excerpt) Read more at biggovernment.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism
KEYWORDS: fcc; netneutrality
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-73 next last
Notice how the FCC is trying to pull this off during the lame duck session before the new Congress is sworn in?

This VIDEO makes it clear why "Net Neutrality is nothing more than a naked power grab by government to control our information access from the internet.

1 posted on 11/24/2010 5:58:47 AM PST by PJ-Comix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix

Okay so what are we doing about it. THe other side cant be happy either. If we all can agree on something its this????


2 posted on 11/24/2010 5:59:56 AM PST by GoCards (Why me? Why not me?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix

They’ll gag every conservative blogger. You’ve been warned!


3 posted on 11/24/2010 6:00:33 AM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix

This statement was at the end of the article:

“Stay tuned – we will soon tell you how you can be a part of the preventative solution.”

I will DEFINITELY be staying attuned to this....as it is quite serious!


4 posted on 11/24/2010 6:02:16 AM PST by SumProVita (Cogito, ergo...Sum Pro Vita. (Modified Decartes))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix

Is this our molon labe moment?


5 posted on 11/24/2010 6:05:19 AM PST by 668 - Neighbor of the Beast (Just say NO to Janetal patdowns.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix
The FCC Will Vote to Take Over the Internet in December

The Republicans in congress had better do something about it in January or they'll never win another national Presidential election and they'll lose the House in 2012.

6 posted on 11/24/2010 6:05:56 AM PST by Steely Tom (Obama goes on long after the thrill of Obama is gone)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix

as of January not one penny of appropriation for the FCC should pass the House


7 posted on 11/24/2010 6:06:39 AM PST by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix
They will be fighting ugly the next two years.

We need to fight uglier.

8 posted on 11/24/2010 6:08:40 AM PST by AU72
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog

The weird thing here is WHAT is the big “problem” that supposedly exists that has to be rectified by government regulation of our flow of information on the Web? I have posted THOUSANDS of posts without any hindrance for years. Anybody else have such trouble? I think not yet here the FCC steps in to supposedly fix a problem that DOES NOT EXIST.


9 posted on 11/24/2010 6:10:31 AM PST by PJ-Comix (The Coupon Whisperer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: GoCards
Okay so what are we doing about it. THe other side cant be happy either. If we all can agree on something its this????

We'll do what America has been doing since the 1800s about overreaching federal government. Absolutely nothing

10 posted on 11/24/2010 6:10:55 AM PST by wastedyears (It has nothing to do with safety, and everything to do with control.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix

Stupid headline,the fcc does not have a vote........


11 posted on 11/24/2010 6:11:06 AM PST by PeterPrinciple ( Seeking the truth here folks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix

You knew this was coming. They can not stand anything that they can’t control. They hate anything that empowers the individual over the collectivity. They have their vicious fangs out and want to know who visits what site, who posts what, who buys what.
Their goals are statist goals: tax the hell out of it until it dies, then take over; monitor all communications and punish those who violate their rules; burden it with oppressive rules and regulations that will deaden growth.


12 posted on 11/24/2010 6:11:21 AM PST by Leftism is Mentally Deranged (Annoying liberals is my goal. I will not be silenced.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix; rdb3; Calvinist_Dark_Lord; GodGunsandGuts; CyberCowboy777; Salo; Bobsat; JosephW; ...

13 posted on 11/24/2010 6:12:06 AM PST by ShadowAce (Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog

After Jan 3rd there is going to be a new Sheriff in town and things are going to be diffrent.


14 posted on 11/24/2010 6:12:54 AM PST by Georgia Girl 2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix
The weird thing here is WHAT is the big “problem” that supposedly exists that has to be rectified by government regulation of our flow of information on the Web? I have posted THOUSANDS of posts without any hindrance for years. Anybody else have such trouble? I think not yet here the FCC steps in to supposedly fix a problem that DOES NOT EXIST.

It's all about illusion.

15 posted on 11/24/2010 6:16:25 AM PST by wastedyears (It has nothing to do with safety, and everything to do with control.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: GoCards

taxes taxes taxes


16 posted on 11/24/2010 6:19:56 AM PST by dalebert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix
the FCC steps in to supposedly fix a problem that DOES NOT EXIST.

I think that people do not see all the pieces that are in motion.

The FCC maneuvers for control of the internet -- heavy government intrusion in communications. For no reason at all.
The TSA manhandles men, women and children at airports -- heavy government intrusion as people seek to move freely about their country. For no reason at all.
USDA is cracking down on home gardening -- heavy government intrusion in private food production. For no reason at all.

It's coming people. The government is a boa constrictor and it is thoroughly wrapped around us and now the coils are tightening.

17 posted on 11/24/2010 6:23:17 AM PST by ClearCase_guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: wastedyears

So true. Now all we hear is if we actually do something about the tyranny, we are giving Obama what he wants.

I say either way, Obama gets what he wants. Question is, do we?


18 posted on 11/24/2010 6:25:01 AM PST by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: dalebert
taxes taxes taxes

Bingo!

19 posted on 11/24/2010 6:25:59 AM PST by bgill (K Parliament- how could a young man born in Kenya who is not even a native American become the POTUS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: PeterPrinciple
You know, there's always a chance that we have a blogger who is stretching things just a little in order to generate hits.

Rule making at federal agencies is governed by the Administrative Procedure Act. If the FCC intended to adopt a new rule at its December meeting, it would have had to issue a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, have gone through the public comment period, and so on. Administrative rules which are adopted without following the governing statutes are void.

20 posted on 11/24/2010 6:28:18 AM PST by Mr. Lucky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-73 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson