Posted on 11/24/2010 7:03:44 AM PST by Natural Born 54
The terminology contained within the reported memo is indeed troubling. It labels any person who interferes with TSA airport security screening procedure protocol and operations by actively objecting to the established screening process, including but not limited to the anticipated national opt-out day as a domestic extremist. The label is then broadened to include any person, group or alternative media source that actively objects to, causes others to object to, supports and/or elicits support for anyone who engages in such travel disruptions at U.S. airports in response to the enhanced security procedures.
(Excerpt) Read more at canadafreepress.com ...
(a) DOMESTIC TERRORISM DEFINED- Section 2331 of title 18, United States Code, is amended (5) the term `domestic terrorism means activities that (B) appear to be intended (i) to intimidate or coerce a civilian population; (ii) to influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion
This is an accurate description of what the TSA is doing.
That scares me so bad I can’t even think of anything funny to say...
I proudly label myself as exactly what this memo labels others.
I bet it will hit the fan today when they start crotch grabbing. What a bunch of Perverts.
Sounds like SEIU to me.
I just got off the phone with my congressman’s D.C. office and made them aware of this abuse of our civil liberties. Thanks for posting.
BO’s Regime has been making Enemies Lists and arrested innocent citizens who speak out against the regimes since 2009.
For information on Crimes committed by the BHO regime:
http://citizenwells.wordpress.com/category/nashville
Anyone assaulted by BO’s TSA Thug Perverts should contact their County Sheriff, DA, Grand Jury Foreman and Police Chief and demand that BO’s TSA Thug Perverts be prosecuted.
For information on forming a Secret Grand Jury to investigate crimes go here:
http://thesteadydrip.blogspot.com/2009/06/how-to-start-and-lead-citizens-grand.html
No one takes pictures of my genitalia unless I am paid for it and I get to choose the other “actors”. /s
So by labeling them “Domestic Extremist”. Is that the same as labeling them a “terrorist” that would allow the patriot act to apply to them and allow them to be held without rights?
Related thread:
DHS and TSA taking names of critics
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2632265/posts
DHS and TSA taking names of critics
The more this (TSA protester="domestic extremist") is disseminated, the better.
New training video for Transportation Security Administration.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sYcARF1-JDg&feature=related
We’re watching you too, BS, and the criminal imposter that you work for.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9sL3uMWujmw&feature=player_embedded
For information on forming a Secret Grand Jury to investigate crimes go here:
http://thesteadydrip.blogspot.com/2009/06/how-to-start-and-lead-citizens-grand.html
So by labeling them Domestic Extremist. Is that the same as labeling them a terrorist that would allow the patriot act to apply to them and allow them to be held without rights?
12 posted on Wednesday, November 24, 2010 9:36:11 AM by DannyTN
The BO Regime has been falsely arresting and imprisoning Patriots who speak out against the BO Regime since 2009.
For information on Crimes committed by the BHO regime:
http://citizenwells.wordpress.com/category/nashville
You’re welcome. Had a business call so I couldn’t say that sooner.
“I was contacted by a source ... who is troubled by ... an internal memo reportedly issued yesterday at the hand of DHS Secretary Janet Napolitano. ... The dissemination of the document itself is restricted by virtue of its classification, which prohibits any manner of public release. ... the document cannot be posted or published ... The memo ... appears to be the product of undated but recent high level meetings ...”
Give me a break. I’m supposed to believe this, why? As far as I’m concerned, this whole “memo” thing is total fiction and without credibility unless they publish a scanned image of the memo. Short of that, there’s no reason whatsoever to believe that this isn’t just being made up.
It may be true. Or it may not be true. I’m sure a lot of people here will believe this because the want to.
Of course you are right that this information is not verified. However, the author does explain why he cannot post the memo:
“The dissemination of the document itself is restricted by virtue of its classification, which prohibits any manner of public release. While the document cannot be posted or published, the more salient points are revealed here.”
Do you know anything about this?
http://www.republicoftheunitedstates.org/
20 posted on Wednesday, November 24, 2010 10:27:23 AM by Natural Born 54
For information on forming a Secret Grand Jury to investigate crimes go here:
http://thesteadydrip.blogspot.com/2009/06/how-to-start-and-lead-citizens-grand.html
I have a hard time getting behind the idea that anybody should be able to convene their own citizen's grand jury and perform a citizen's arrest of the POTUS. Because if he could do that, then democrats wouldn't have hesitated to do the same to Bush.
If you didn't have other checks and balances, it would be different. But you do, the fact that those other checks and balances have failed in a spectacular fashion this election is still not a reason to support the citizen arrest of the President.
You have had a spineless Congress who failed to investigate. You've had a spineless supreme court that has "evaded the question". You had republican VP Cheney failing to ask the electoral college for objections. You've had corrupt lower judges that have bended to pressure. You've had state attorney Generals unwilling to look into the issue. You've had state election officials unwilling to demand credentials. You've had a failure of both congress and all 50 state legislatures to actually put a credential check process into law. You've had Hawaii evading their responsibility to come totally clean on the President's credentials.
The checks and balances are there except for a codified credential check. I don't see the justification to resurrect a colonial grand jury system and allow citizen arrests of public officials.
I have a hard time getting behind the idea that anybody should be able to convene their own citizen's grand jury and perform a citizen's arrest of the POTUS. Because if he could do that, then democrats wouldn't have hesitated to do the same to Bush.
If you didn't have other checks and balances, it would be different. But you do, the fact that those other checks and balances have failed in a spectacular fashion this election is still not a reason to support the citizen arrest of the President.
You have had a spineless Congress who failed to investigate. You've had a spineless supreme court that has "evaded the question". You had republican VP Cheney failing to ask the electoral college for objections. You've had corrupt lower judges that have bended to pressure. You've had state attorney Generals unwilling to look into the issue. You've had state election officials unwilling to demand credentials. You've had a failure of both congress and all 50 state legislatures to actually put a credential check process into law. You've had Hawaii evading their responsibility to come totally clean on the President's credentials.
The checks and balances are there except for a codified credential check. I don't see the justification to resurrect a colonial grand jury system and allow citizen arrests of public officials.
Get your fact straight, DannyTN.
Leo Haffey was NOT involved with any “citizens arrests” and NEVER advocated that anyone make ill-advised “citizens arrests.”
http://standupamericaus.com/our-privilege-our-right-and-our-duty-civilian-grand-jury:33320
In case they are reading this:
Obama, you are skinny little jug-eared idiot.
Janet, you are a big fat hideous bull dyke.
John Pistole, you are a dweeb who looks like he wants to stick his hands down the pants of strangers.
Domestic extremist checking in...
PING!
Welcome to the club.
BItter clinger here!
Ok, I guess he was just supporting someone who tried to make a citizen arrest off of a private grand jury.
But the man has two neighbors claiming he swerved vehicles in their direction. And apparently his wife got a restraining order against him. Could they be trumped up charges? Sure. But it’s beyond my ability to sort out.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.